Skip to main content
Log in

Natural Signs and the Origin of Language

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers natural signs and their role in the origin of language. Natural signs, sometimes called primary signs, are connected with their signified by causal relationships, concomitance, or likeliness. And their acquisition is directed by both objective reality and past experience (memory). The discovery and use of natural signs is a required prerequisite of existence for any living systems because they are indispensable to movement, the search for food, regulation, communication, and many other information-related activities. It is argued that the birth of conventional signs, sometimes called secondary signs, was determined by a connotative use of natural signs and that, regulated and maintained by them, human language developed. At the same time, the origin and development of human language presupposes a ‘rational turn’ from the given and external reality of natural signs to the rationally constructed reality of artificial signs and rules that are internally maintained by the subjects’ deliberate activities, and actual and inherited social tradition (social memory). In view of this, language is defined as a dynamic system that must both be natural and artificial, empirical and a priori, inductive and deductive. This bilateral origin and regulation of language is the dual-inference of language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. New York: Noonday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corballis, M. C. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1997). How to do other things with words. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 42, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. (2006). Ignorance of language. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, F. C. (1987). Memory and sun compensation by honey bees. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 160, 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, F. C. (2002). The biology of the dance language. Annual Review of Entomology, 47(1), 917–949.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faye, J. (2009). Interpretation in the natural sciences. In M. Dorato, M. Rédei, & M. Suárez (Eds.), EPSA epistemology and methodology of science: Launch of the European philosophy of sciences association. Springer Verlag.

  • Fisher, S. (2006). Sexual selection in language, music and birdsong–common themes and issues. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2050.

  • Fredborg, K. M., Nielsen, L., & Pinborg, J. (1978). An unedited part of Roger Bacon’s. “Opus Maius: De Signis”. Traditio, 34, 75–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Cooperation and the evolution of symbolic communication. In K. Oller & U. Griebel (Eds.), The evolution of communication systems (pp 237–256). MIT Press.

  • Glinwood, R., Ninkovic, V., & Pettersson, J. (2011). Chemical interaction between undamaged plants—effects on herbivores and natural enemies. Phytochemistry doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.010

  • Heil, M., Ulrich, L., & Wilhelm, B. (2008). Defence-inducing volatiles: in search for the active motif. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 34(5), 601–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermerén, G. (1992). Expression, meaning, and nonvebal communication. In J. Emt & G. Hermerén (Eds.), Understanding the arts (pp. 129–146). Lund: Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban, R., & Shiojiri, K. (2009). Self-recognition affects plant communication and defense. Ecology Letters, 12, 502–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K. (2000). An introduction to phytosemiotics: semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 326–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T. (2005). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/reidinqu.pdf

  • Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N., & Speed, M. P. (2004). Avoiding attack: The evolutionary ecology of Crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press.

  • Schiestl, F. P. (2010). The evolution of floral scent and insect chemical communication. Ecological Letters, 13(5), 643–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilmiller, A. L., & Howe, G. A. (2005). Systemic signaling in the wound response. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8(4), 369–377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, M. (2005). Language from a biological perspective. Journal of Biosciences, 30(1), 119–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (2006). Why we still need knowledge of language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 6(18), 431–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhoverkhov, A. (2010). Memory, sign systems, and self-reproductive processes. Biological Theory, 5(2), 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C., & Sigman, J. (1993). Interpretation in science and the arts. In G. Levine (Ed.), Realism and representation: Essays on the problem of realism in relation to science, literature and culture (pp. 73–99). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, A. M. (2002). The elusive honey bee dance “Language” hypothesis. Journal of Insect Behaviour, 15(6), 859–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Sukhoverkhov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sukhoverkhov, A. Natural Signs and the Origin of Language. Biosemiotics 5, 153–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9123-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9123-3

Keywords

Navigation