Skip to main content
Log in

Rereading sophistical arguments: A political intervention

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay argues that Aristotle's categories of oratory are not as useful in judging the methods of Sophistical rhetoric as his presentation of time. The Sophistical argumentative method of “making the weaker the stronger case” is re-evaluated as a political practice. After showing this argument's relation to power and ideology, Aristotle's philosophy, which privileges a procedure of argument consistent with the politics of a polis-ideal rhetoric, is offered as reason for objecting to Sophistical rhetoric. The essay concludes that Sophistical rhetoric prefers the concept of possibility over Aristotelian actuality, and offers a need for an ideological space of radical, generative possibility in rhetorical theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahl, F.: 1984, ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology, 105 174–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1952, Metaphysics, Richard Hope (trans.), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1954, Rhetoric and Poetics, W.R. Roberts (trans.), The Modern Library Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1962a, Nichomachean Ethics, Martin Ostwald (trans.), The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1962b, Politics, Ernest Barker (trans.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1984, Physics J. Barnes (trans.), in B. Jowett (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 315–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M.J.: 1971, Motion and Motion's God, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnyeat, M.F.: 1976, ‘Protagoras and Self-Refutation’, Philosophical Review 85, 44–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, C.J.: 1981, ‘Aristotle's Picture of the Sophists’, in G.B. Kerferd (ed.), The Sophists and Their Legacy, Franz Steiner Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, E.M.: 1857, ‘On the Sophistical Rhetoric’, Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology 3, 34–80, 128–167, 253–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, E.M.: 1854, ‘The Sophists’, Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology 1, 145–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edel, Abraham: 1982, Aristotle and His Philosophy, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engberg-Pedersen, Troels: 1983, Aristotle's Theory of Moral Insight, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enos, Richard L.: 1980, ‘Emerging Notions of Argument and Advocacy in Hellenic Litigation: Antiphon's On the Murder of Herodes’, The Journal of the American Forensic Association 27, 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farenga, Vincent: 1979, ‘Periphrasis on the Origin of Rhetoric’, Modern Language Notes 94, 1033–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.A.: 1968, The Letters of Demosthenes, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W.K.C.: 1971, The Sophists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, N.G.L.: 1967, A History of Greece to 322 B.C., Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin: 1962, Being and Time, John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (trans.), Harper and Row Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, D.A.G.: 1940, ‘Tisia and Corax and the Invention of Rhetoric’, Classical Quarterly 34, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Williams, H.: 1951, ‘Political Speeches in Athens’, Classical Quarterly 65, 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, Edward: 1972, The Pre-Socratics, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, Donald: 1986, Consequences of Phenomenology, State University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, Werner: 1970, Paideia: The Ideals of a Greek Culture, 3 vols., G. Highet (trans.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, John: 1962, On Aristotle and Greek Tragedy, Chatto and Windus, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, R.: 1980, ‘Heidegger and the Possible’, Philosophical Studies 27, 176–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, George: 1959, ‘The Earliest Rhetorical Handbooks’, American Journal of Philology 80, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, George: 1963, The Art of Persuasion in Greece, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, George: 1980, Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerferd, G.B.: 1981, The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François: 1978, ‘On the Strength of the Weak’, Semiotext 3, 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François: 1988, The Differend: Phrases in Dispute, George Van Den Abbeele (trans.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François, and Jean-Loup Thebaud: 1985, Just Gaming, Wlad Godzich (trans.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, Richard: 1942–1973, Rhetoric: Essays in Invention and Discovery, Mark Backman (ed.), 1987, Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge, CT.

  • McKeon, Richard: 1981, ‘The Interpretation of Political Theory and Practice in Ancient Athens’, Journal of the History of Ideas 42, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Roger: 1982, ‘The Case for Sophistry’, in Brian Vickers (ed.), Rhetoric Revalued, Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, Binghamtom, N.Y., pp. 207–224.

  • Plato: 1921, Sophist, H.N. Fowler (trans.), William Heinemann Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, 1952, Gorgias, W.C. Helmbold (trans.), The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: 1966a, ‘Greater Hippias’, B. Jowett (trans.), Edith Hamilton and Hunnington Cairns (eds.), The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Bollingen Foundation, New York, pp. 1534–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: 1966b, ‘Republic’, Paul Shorey (trans.), Edith Hamilton and Hunnington Cairns (eds.), The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Bollingen Foundation, New York, pp. 575–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: 1973, Phaedrus, Walter Hamilton (trans.), Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulakos, John: 1983a, ‘Aristotle's indebtedness to the Sophists’, in D. Zarefsky, M.O. Sillars, and J. Rhodes (eds.), Argument in Transition: Proceedings of the Third Summer Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Annandale, VA, pp. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulakos, John: 1983b, ‘Gorgias' Encomium to Helen and the Defense of Rhetoric’, Rhetorica 1, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulakos, John: 1983c, ‘Towards a Sophistic Definition of Rhetoric’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 16, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulakos, John: 1984, ‘Rhetoric, the Sophists, and the Possible’, Communication Monographs 51, 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, John Herman: 1960, Aristotle, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul: 1977, The Rule of Metaphor, Robert Czerny and Kathleen McLaughlin, and John Costello, SJ (trans.), University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sesonske, Alexander: 1979, ‘To Make the Weaker Argument Defeat the Stronger’, in Keith V. Erickson (ed.), Plato: True and Sophistic Rhetoric, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solmsen, Friedrich: 1941, ‘The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology 62, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, Rosamond Kent: 1972, The Older Sophists, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struever, Nancy S.: 1970, The Language of History in the Renaissance, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides: 1960, The Peloponnesian War, Benjamin Jowett (trans.), Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Eric Charles: 1987, Kaironomia: The Will to Invent, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Stanley: 1942, ‘The Scope of Early Rhetorical Instruction’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 53, 121–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Stanley: 1943, ‘Corax and The Prolegomena’, American Journal of Philology 64, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutton, J. Rereading sophistical arguments: A political intervention. Argumentation 5, 141–157 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054002

Key words

Navigation