Skip to main content
Log in

Descriptions and Uniqueness

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Asher, N. (1993): Reference to Abstract Objects, Dordrecht: Kluewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (1987): Thought and Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J. and Cooper J. (1981): 'Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J. and J. Perry (1983): Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chastain, C. (1975): 'Reference and Context', in K. Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7. Language, Mind, and Knowledge, pp. 194-269, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1975): 'Questions of Form and Interpretation', Linguistic Analysis 1, 75-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K. (1966): 'Reference and Definite Descriptions', Philosophical Review 75, 281-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982): The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.D. and Sag, I. (1982): 'Referential and Quantificational Indefinites', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1982): The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Garland Publishing Inc., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1983): 'File-Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness', in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 164-190, Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1990): 'E-type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1991): 'Artikel und Definitheit', in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch der zeigenössischen Forschung, pp. 487-535, Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, N. (1987): On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification. PhD. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Garland Publishing Inc., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. (1981): 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation', in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Natural Language, pp. 277-322, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993): From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. (1987): 'A Semantic Definition of “Indefinite NP”', in E.J. Reuland and A.G.B. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, pp. 286-317, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E. and Westerstahl, D. (1997): 'Generalized Quantifiers in Linguistics and Logic', in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 837-894, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1977): 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2, 255-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (1994): 'Conditionals, Events, and Unbound Pronouns', Lingua e Stile 29, 165-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. and Neale, S. (1991): 'Indefinite Descriptions: In Defense of Russell', Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 171-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J. (1979): 'Presupposition and Discourse Structure', in D. Dinneen and C. Oh (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 11, pp. 371-388, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, G. (1977): 'Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities in the Existential Construction in English', Linguistic Analysis 3, 1-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. (1990): Descriptions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (1993): Direct Reference, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, M. (1998a): 'The Wettstein/Salmon Debate: Critique and Resolution', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79, 130-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, M. (1998b) 'Donnellan's Distinction/Kripke's Test', Analysis 58, 89-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, M. (1990): Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, N. (1991): 'The Pragmatic Fallacy', Philosophical Studies 63, 83-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley J. and Williamson, T. (1995): 'Quantifiers and Context-Dependence', Analysis 55(4), 291-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. (1950): 'On Referring', reprinted in: Logico-Linguistic Papers, pp. 1-27, London: Methuen, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. (1959): Individuals, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eijck, J. and Kamp, H. (1997): 'Representing Discourse in Context', in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 179-238, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, H. (1981): 'Demonstrative Reference and Definite Descriptions', Philosophical Studies 40, 241-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, H. (1983): 'The Semantic Significance of the Referential-Attributive Distinction', reprinted in Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake? pp. 50-58, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szabó, Z.G. Descriptions and Uniqueness. Philosophical Studies 101, 29–57 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026437211756

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026437211756

Navigation