Abstract
Humanism – in the sense that humans alonehave moral standing, or else a surpassing degree of it– has traditionally dominated all of ethicaldiscourse. However, its past formulations havesuccumbed to the temptation merely to stipulate sucha criterion, such as rationality, which nonhumans areoften deemed (without sufficient argument) to failwithout exception. Animal liberationistarguments do exist in counterpoint to traditionalhumanism, but one current difficulty seems to be asimple clash of basic assumptions, with an indecisiveresult. Although the author of this paper is anonanthropocentrist, he attempts to further the moraltheoretical debate by constructing a more powerfulversion of humanism, based in a pursuit of the good,per se. The theory is premised upon viewing humans asgenerally having and leading lives of greater value,in some relevant sense. This essay prefigures theauthor's refutation of humanism, more generally, inthe understanding that such a world view cannot trulybe refuted unless its best version is answered.Whatever the status of this paper's offering of``Obligatory'' Anthropocentrism, the theory can be seento have a great deal more success than itspredecessors in parrying, and apparently outdoing,contemporary animal liberationist philosophies.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aquinas, T., “Differences between Rational and Other Creatures,” in T. Regan and P. Singer (eds), Animal Rights and Human Obligations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989), pp. 6-9.
Aristotle, The Nichomachean Ethics (Penguin Book Ltd., Harmondsworth, 1976).
Carruthers, P., The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
Cebik, L. B., “Can Animals Have Rights? No and Yes,” The Philosophical Forum 12 (1981), 251-268.
Cigman, R., “Death, Misfortune, and Species Inequality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (Winter 1981), 47-64.
Cohen, C., “The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research,” The New England Journal of Medicine 315 (October 1986), 865-870.
DeGrazia, D., Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996).
Fox, M. A., “Animal Experimentation: Avoiding Unnecessary Suffering,” in National Symposium on Imperatives in Research Animal Use: Scientific Needs and Animal Welfare (National Institutes of Health, Washington, 1984), pp. 111-116.
Frey, R. G., “Animal Parts, Human Wholes,” in J. M. Humber and R. F. Almeder (eds), Biomedical Ethics Reviews-1987 (Humana Press, Clifton, NJ, 1987), pp. 89-107.
Hegel, G. W. F., Reason in History: A General Introduction to the Philosophy of History, translated by R. S. Hartman (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1953).
Holland, A., “On Behalf of a Moderate Speciesism,” The Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1984), 281-291.
Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, translated by L. W. Beck (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1949).
Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, translated by H. J. Paton (Harper and Row Publishers, Incorporated, New York, 1964).
Leahy, M. P. T., Against Liberation: Putting animals in perspective (Routledge, New York, 1991).
Melden, A. I., Rights in Moral Lives: A Historical-Philosophical Essay (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1988).
Miller, P., “Do Animals Have Interests Worthy of our Moral Interest?” Environmental Ethics 5 (Winter 1983), 319-334.
Miller, P., “Value as Richness: Toward a Value Theory for the Expanded Naturalism in Environmental Ethics,” Ethics 4 (Summer 1982), 101-114.
Pluhar, E., Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals (Duke University Press, Durham, 1995).
Regan, T., The Case for Animal Rights (University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1983).
Regan, T., “An Examination and Defense of One Argument Concerning Animal Rights,” in T. Regan (ed.), All That Dwell Therein: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982), pp. 113-147.
Regan, T., The Struggle for Animal Rights (International Society for Animal Rights, Inc., Clarks Summit, PA, 1987).
Rollin, B., Animal Rights and Human Morality: Revised Edition (Prometheus Books, Buffalo, 1992).
Sapontzis, S. F. Morals, Reason, and Animals (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1987).
Singer, P., Animal Liberation (Avon Books, New York, 1990).
Steinbock, B., “Speciesism and the Idea of Equality,” Philosophy 53 (April 1978), 247-256.
Watson, R. A., “Self-Consciousness and the Rights of Nonhuman Animals and Nature,” Environmental Ethics 1 (Summer 1979), 99-129.
Williams,M., “Rights, Interests, andMoral Equality,” Environmental Ethics 2 (1980), 149-161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sztybel, D. Taking Humanism Seriously: ``Obligatory'' Anthropocentrism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13, 181–203 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009507315999
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009507315999