Skip to content
Open Access Published by De Gruyter March 18, 2010

Intimacy, Admirability, and Virtue: An Examination of Michael Slote's View

  • Munir Talukder
From the journal Human Affairs

Intimacy, Admirability, and Virtue: An Examination of Michael Slote's View

Virtues, according to Michael Slote, are our inner traits or dispositions. Slote defends "balanced caring" as an admirable character trait. He believes that caring more for intimates than others is admirable. A virtuous person attains balanced caring between intimates and others. This account of virtue conceived "balanced caring" as "fundamentally admirable" and it is the basic virtue. All other virtues, such as honesty, kindness, generosity, truthfulness, and so forth, are "derivatively admirable". This paper examines Slote's view and argues that Slote should explore the opposite situation because his idea of "balanced caring" and "admirability" is so vague and misleading. In contrast to his ideas, a reverse formulation that is caring for others more than for intimates seems plausible.

References

Aristotle. FromThe Nicomachean Ethics. In S. Darwall (Ed.). Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 7-50, 2003.10.1093/oseo/instance.00262114Search in Google Scholar

Arnett, R. C., Arneson, P.Dialogic Civility in a Cynical Age: Community, Hope, and Interpersonal Relationships. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Baron, M. W., Pettit, P., Slote, M.Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Blum, L. A. Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for Moral Theory. In M. J. Larrabee (Ed.). An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 49-68, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Copp, D., Sobel, D. Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics. Ethics 114, 514-554, 2004.10.1086/382058Search in Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. Moral Orientation and Moral Development. In M. Timmons (Ed.). Conduct and Character: Readings in Moral Theory. Ontario: Thomson Wadsworth, 228-237, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Hursthouse, R.On Virtue Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Kawall, J. Virtue Theory, Ideal Observers, and The Supererogatory. Philosophical Studies 146, 179-196, 2009.10.1007/s11098-008-9250-0Search in Google Scholar

Noddings, N. An Ethic of Caring. In M. Timmons (Ed.). Conduct and Character: Readings in Moral Theory. Ontario: Thomson Wadsworth, 244-255, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Slote, M.From Morality to Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Slote, M.Morals from Motives. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.10.1093/0195138376.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Slote, M. Agent-Based Virtue Ethics. In S. Darwall (Ed.).Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 203-226, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Slote, M. Autonomy and Empathy.Social Philosophy and Policy 21, 293-309, 2004.10.1017/S0265052504211128Search in Google Scholar

Slote, M.The Ethics of Care and Empathy. New York: Routledge, 2007.10.4324/9780203945735Search in Google Scholar

Tong, R.Feminine and Feminist Ethics. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2010-3-18
Published in Print: 2010-3-1

This content is open access.

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/v10023-010-0005-0/html
Scroll to top button