Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:28:46.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Climate Change and Non-Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2021

Lukas Tank Open the ORCID record for Lukas Tank [Opens in a new window]
Lukas Tank*
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
*
Email: tanklukx@hu-berlin.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What is the practical relevance of the Non-Identity Problem (NIP) for our climate change-related duties? Climate change and the NIP are often discussed together, but there is surprisingly little work on the practical relevance of the NIP for the ethics of climate change. The central claim of this article is that the NIP makes a relatively minor difference to our climate change-related duties even if we pursue what has become known as the ‘bite the bullet’ strategy: endorse a person-affecting view threatened by the NIP and not modify it in such a way as to evade the NIP. In particular I will argue that a harm-based view can justify the big-picture call for action emerging from the field of climate ethics. The key to reaching this conclusion is pointing out the consequences of our climate change-related decisions for people whose existence does not depend on these very decisions.

Type
Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 84 - 96
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcalde, Juan, Flude, Stephanie, Wilkinson, Mark, Johnson, Gareth, Edlmann, Katriona, Bond, Clare E., Scott, Vivian, Gilfillan, Stuart M. V., Ogaya, Xènia and Stuart Haszeldine, R. (2018). Estimating Geological CO2 Storage Security to Deliver on Climate Mitigation. Nature Communications 9, Article 2201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrhenius, Gustaf (2000). An Impossibility Theorem for Welfarist Axiologies. Economics and Philosophy 16(2), 247–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, Gustaf, Ryberg, Jesper and Tännsjö, Torbjörn (2017). The Repugnant Conclusion. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 edn.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/repugnant-conclusion/ (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar
Berkey, Brian (2017). Human Rights, Harm, and Climate Change Mitigation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47(2–3), 416–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bontly, Thomas D. (2019). Climate Change, Intergenerational Justice, and the Non-Identity Effect. Intergenerational Justice Review 5(2), 56–62.Google Scholar
Boonin, David (2014). The Non-Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookings (2020). Living into the 22nd Century (by Wolfgang Fengler). Brookings Website. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2020/01/14/living-into-the-22nd-century/ (accessed 14 January 2021).Google Scholar
Broome, John (2012). Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon (2020). Climate Justice. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 edn.). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020 /entries/justice-climate (accessed 12 January 2021).Google Scholar
Cripps, Elizabeth (2013). Climate Change and the Moral Agent: Individual Duties in an Interdependent World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Ramon (2014). Has Industrialization Benefited No One? Climate Change and the Non-Identity Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17(4), 747–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Marc D. (2008). Wrongful Harm to Future Generations: The Case of Climate Change, Environmental Values 17(4), 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Development Assistance Research Associates (2012). Climate Vulnerability Monitor. 2nd edn. Madrid: DARA.Google Scholar
Fragnière, Augustin (2018). How Demanding is Our Climate Duty? An Application of the No-Harm Principle to Individual Emissions. Environmental Values 27, 645–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Humanitarian Forum (2009). Human Impact Report Climate Change: The Anatomy of a Silent Crisis. Geneva: Global Humanitarian Forum.Google Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth (2004). Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating? Philosophical Perspectives 18, 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth (2009). Harming as Causing Harm. In Roberts, M. A. and Wasserman, D. T. (eds.), Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Dordrecht: Springer, 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, David (1992). Genethics. Moral Issues in the Creation of People. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, David (2009). The Intractability of the Non-Identity Problem. In Roberts, M. A. and Wasserman, D. T. (eds.), Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Dordrecht: Springer, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Brad (2009). The Demandingness Objection. In Chappell, T. (ed.), The Problem of Moral Demandingness. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 148–52.Google Scholar
IEEP (2020). More than half of CO2 Emissions since 1751 Emitted in the Past 30 Years, IEEP Website. URL: https://ieep.eu/news/more-than-half-of-all-co2-emissions-since-1751-emitted-in-the-last-30-years (accessed 12 January 2021).Google Scholar
IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff (2021). Climate Change, War, and the Non-Identity Problem. Journal of Moral Philosophy 18, 211–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElwee, Brian (2017). Demandingness Objections in Ethics. Philosophical Quarterly 67, 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Kirsten (2018). Was schulden wir künftigen Generationen? Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, Darrel (2014). The Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change. Values, Poverty, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, Darrel (2015). Climate Change Justice. Philosophy Compass 10(3), 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Liam B. (2000). Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nedevska, Jasmina (2019). The Non-Identity Problem in Climate Ethics: A Restatement. Intergenerational Justice Review 5(2), 63–68.Google Scholar
Nolt, John (2018). Cumulative Harm as a Function of Carbon Emissions. In Murphy, C., Gardoni, P. and McKim, R. (eds.), Climate Change and Its Impacts. Risk and Inequalities. Cham: Springer Nature, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Our World in Data (2019a). How Many People Die and How Many People are Born Each Year? Our World in Data Website. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/births-and-deaths (accessed 13 January 2021).Google Scholar
Our World in Data (2019b). Age Structure. Our World in Data Website. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/age-structure (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar
Page, Edward (1999). Global Warming and the Non-Identity Problem. In Kim, T-Chang and Gene Frankland, E. (eds.), Self and Future Generations. Cambridge: White Horse Press, 107–30.Google Scholar
Page, Edward (2006). Climate Change, Justice, and Future Generations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (2017). Future People, the Non-Identity Problem, and Person-Affecting Principles. Philosophy and Public Affairs 45(2), 118–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rentmeester, Casey (2014). Do No Harm: A Cross-Disciplinary, Cross-Cultural Climate Ethics. De Ethica 1, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricke, Katharine L. and Caldeira, Ken (2014). Maximum Warming Occurs about One Decade after a Carbon Dioxide Emission. Environmental Research Letters 9, 124002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Melinda A. (2020). The Nonidentity Problem. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 edn.). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/nonidentity-problem (accessed 14 January 2021).Google Scholar
Roser, Dominic and Seidel, Christian (2017). Climate Justice. An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel (2018). Why Worry About Future Generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana V. (1999). Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm. Legal Theory 5(2), 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry (2015). Historical Responsibility, Harm Prohibition, and Preservation Requirement: Core Practical Convergence on Climate Change. Moral Philosophy and Politics 2(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, David (2007). The Impotence of the Demandingness Objection. Philosophers’ Imprint 7, 1–17.Google Scholar
Springman, Marco et al. (2016). Global and Regional Health Effects of Future Food Production under Climate Change: a Modelling Study. The Lancet 387(10031), 1937–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderheiden, Steve (2008). Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2018). Factsheet Climate Change and Health. WHO Website. URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health (accessed 5 January 2021).Google Scholar
Woollard, Fiona (2012). Have We Solved the Non-Identity Problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5), 677–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar