Abstract
This essay is an attempt to sketch out two contrasting notions of freedom in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi. I argue that to understand the classical Chinese formulations of freedom we should look at the concept of hua 化 (transformation or to transform). It is a kind of freedom that highlights the moral and/or spiritual transformation of the self and its entailments on the connection between the self and various domains of relationality. The Zhuangzian hua is the transformation of the self in such a way that the self becomes supremely attuned to the complexity of the world and can thus navigate various domains of relationality with extraordinary grace, ease, and efficacy. The Xunzian hua is the transformation of the self so that the self can extend its relationality to include the entire world and transform it from a raw and uncouth world to a civilized one through ritual practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger & David Hall. 2001. Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
An, Yanming. 2005. The Idea of Cheng (Sincerity/Reality) in the History of Chinese Philosophy. New York: Global Scholarly Publications.
Brindley, Erica. 2010. Individualism in Early China: Human Agency and the Self in Thought and Politics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1969. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cook, Scott. 1997. “Zhuang Zi and His Carving of the Confucian Ox.” Philosophy East and West 47: 521–553.
Fingarette, Herbert. 1998. Confucius: The Secular As Sacred. Waveland Press.
Fu, Fen’ge 付粉鸽. 2009. Nature and Freedom: A Study of the Philosophy of Life in the Laozi and the Zhuangzi 自然与自由:老庄生命哲学研究. Beijing北京: Remin Chubanshe 人民出版社.
Goldin, Paul. 1999. Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago: Open Court.
Graham, A.C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago: Open Court.
Graham, A.C. trans. 2001. Chuang Tzu: The Inner Chapters. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Hall, David & Roger Ames. 2001. Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Hansen, Chad. 1972. “Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Confucian Ethics.” Philosophy East and West 22: 169–186.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2000. “Human Nature and Moral Understanding in the Xunzi.” In Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Edited by T.C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Knoblock, John. 1988. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Volume I, Books 1–6” Stanford: Stanford University Press.
_____. 1990. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Volume II, Books 7-16. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
_____. 1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Volume III, Books 17-32. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mair, Victor, trans. 1997. Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of C huang Tzu. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Sato, Masayuki. 2003. The Confucian Quest for Order: The Origin and Formation of the Political Thought of Xun Zi. Leiden: Brill.
Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-wei As Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, Aaron. 2006. Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine. Washington, DC.: Georgetown University Press.
Van Norden, Bryant. 2000. “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency.” In Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Edited by T.C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Wang, Guoxuan 王國軒, ed. 2006. The Great Learning and the Doctrine of Mean 大學 · 中庸. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Watson, Burton, trans. 1963. Hsün Tzu: Basic Writings. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
_____. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wong, David. 2000. “Xunzi on Moral Motivation.” In Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Edited by T.C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Wu, Genyou. 2006. “On the Idea of Freedom and Its Rejection in Chinese Thought and Institutions.” Asian Philosophy 16: 219–235.
Xu, Keqian 徐克谦. 2005. New Exploration of Zhuangzi’s Philosophy: Dao, Language, Freedom and Beauty 庄子哲学新探:道,言,自由与美. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中华书局.
Yang, Guorong 杨国荣. 2011. On the Dao 道论. Beijing北京: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe 北京大學出版社.
Yearley, Lee. 1983. “The Perfected Person in the Radical Chuang-tzu.” In Experimental Essays on Chuang-tzu. Edited by Victor H. Mair. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Ziporyn, Brook. 2009. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tao, J. Two Notions of Freedom in Classical Chinese Thought: The Concept of Hua 化 in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi . Dao 10, 463–486 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-011-9245-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-011-9245-y