Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 July 2014
The problem of evil for theists was how to reconcile suffering with a benevolent God. Hume solved the problem of evil by claiming that the divine was amoral but not by denying God's existence which he needed in order to advocate his favoured notion of a general providence. Indeed, Hume's treatment of the problem of evil showed that his quarrel in the Natural History of Religion1and the Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding,2Section XI, was with a particular providence rather than the possibility of a divine orderer. The fundamental problem of evil for Hume, was evil's potential to drive people to the notion of a particular providence with its attendant damaging passions. In considering his alternative of the general providence Hume is shown to be closer to theism than has often been thought.
1 Hume, D., Principal Writings on Religion including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and The Natural History of Religion (ed.) Gaskin, J.C.A., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993/1757, 1779)Google Scholar, abbreviated NHR in the text.
2 Hume, D., Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning The Principles of Morals (ed.) Selby-Bigge, L.A., rev. P.H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975/1777)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, abbreviated EHU in the text.
3 I am grateful to Mr T. Miles for comments on an earlier version of this paper.
4 Ha, L. Tai, ‘Was Hume an Atheist? A Reconsideration’ Filozofia, 66 (2011), 240–257, 248Google Scholar.
5 Hume, D., Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (ed.) Smith, N.K., (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1947/1779)Google Scholar, abbreviated DNR in the text.
6 Ibid., 199.
7 Ibid., 220.
8 Ibid., 201.
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid., 202.
11 Hereafter AFD.
12 Hume, EHU, op. cit. 142.
13 Hume, DNR, op. cit. 143.
14 Hume, EHU, op. cit. 140–141.
15 Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, Book One (ed.) Macnabb, D. (Glasgow: Fontana/Collins, 1962/1739), 162–163Google Scholar.
16 Hume, D., ‘Of the Immortality of the Soul’, in (ed.) Miller, E.F., Essays Moral, Political and Literary (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1987), 592Google Scholar.
17 Ibid.
18 Hume, EHU, op. cit. 141.
19 Ibid.
20 Hume, EHU, op. cit. 135.
21 Ibid., 140.
22 Hume, NHR, op. cit. 153. [My italics].
23 Ibid., 139.
24 Ibid., 176.
25 Hume, EHU, op. cit. 142.
26 Hume, DNR, op. cit. Intro. 23.
27 Hume, NHR, op. cit. 154.
28 Hume, ‘Of Superstition and Enthusiasm’, in (ed.) E.F. Miller, op. cit. 77.
29 Hume, DNR, op. cit. 220.
30 Hume, DNR, op. cit. 222.
31 Ibid., 154.
32 Hume, NHR, op. cit. 138.
33 Ibid., 150.
34 Hume, DNR, op. cit., 201–202.
35 Hume, Treatise, op. cit. 212.
36 Hume, EHU, op. cit. 19.
37 Ibid., 165.
38 Ibid.,144.
39 Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, Books Two and Three (ed.) Ardal, P., (London: Fontana/Collins, 1972/1740), 57Google Scholar.
40 Hume, NHR, op. cit. 154.
41 Hume, ‘Of the Standard of Taste’, in (ed.) E.F. Miller, op. cit. 242.
42 Hume, NHR, op. cit. 153.
43 Hume, D., A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh (eds) Mossner, E.C. and Price, J.V. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1967/1745)Google Scholar.
44 Ibid., 25
45 Hume, NHR, op. cit. 184.
46 Ibid., 178.
47 Ibid., 153.
48 Ibid., 160.
49 Ibid., 159.
50 Ibid., 154.
51 Hume, EHU, op. cit. 294.
52 Hume, DNR, op. cit. 215.
53 Hume, NHR, op. cit. 182.
