Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:43:22.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Anne Marie Tassé
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Until the mid-20th century, biomedical research centered on the study of specific diseases, concerned with short periods of time and small groups of living research participants. However, the growth of longitudinal population studies and long-term biobanking now forces the research community to examine the possibility of the death of their research participants.

The death of a research participant raises numerous ethical and legal issues, including the return of deceased individuals’ research results to related family members. As with the return of individual research results for living research participants, the question of the obligation to return a deceased person’s research results to family members has yet to be settled. This question is particularly acute in the context of genetic research since the research results from one individual may have health implications for all biological relatives.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , Winter 2011 , pp. 621 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canadian Legal Information Institute, CanLII, available at <http://www.canlii.org/en/> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
U.S. Government, USA.Gov, available at <http://www.usa.gov/Topics/Reference_Shelf/Laws.shtml> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
French Secrétariat général du gouvernement, LegiFrance, available at <http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/> (last visited August 17, 2011).+(last+visited+August+17,+2011).>Google Scholar
Centre of Genomics and Policy, HumGen International, available at <http://www.humgen.org/int/> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Council of Europe Treaties, available at <http://conventions.coe.int/> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health, Pubmed, available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed (last visited August 19, 2011).Google Scholar
Google, Google Scholar, available at <http://scholar.google.com> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
On this topic, see Lévesque, E. Joly, Y. Simard, J., “Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives”; and Knoppers, B. M. Lévesque, E., “Introduction: Return of Research Results: How Should Research Results Be Handled?” in this symposium.Google Scholar
World Medical Association, WMA Declaration on Ethical Considerations Regarding Health Databases, Washington, D.C., 2002, available at <http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/d1/index.html> (last visited August 19, 2011); World Health Organization, Genetic Databases Assessing the Benefits and the Impact on Human & Patient Rights, Geneva, 2003, available at <www.codex.vr.se/texts/whofinalreport.rtf> (last visited August 19, 2011); World Medical Association, WMA International Code of Medical Ethics, South Africa, 2006, available at <http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/c8/index.html> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011);+World+Health+Organization,+Genetic+Databases+Assessing+the+Benefits+and+the+Impact+on+Human+&+Patient+Rights,+Geneva,+2003,+available+at++(last+visited+August+19,+2011);+World+Medical+Association,+WMA+International+Code+of+Medical+Ethics,+South+Africa,+2006,+available+at++(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences in collaboration with the World Health Organization, International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Geneva, 2002, at Guidelines 5 and 18, available at <http://www.fhi.org/training/fr/retc/pdf_files/cioms.pdf> (last visited August 19, 2011); Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and the World Health Organization, International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies, Geneva, 2008, at Guidelines 5(15) and 18, available at <http://www.fhi.org/training/fr/retc/pdf_files/cioms.pdf> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011);+Council+for+International+Organizations+of+Medical+Sciences+and+the+World+Health+Organization,+International+Ethical+Guidelines+for+Epidemiological+Studies,+Geneva,+2008,+at+Guidelines+5(15)+and+18,+available+at++(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
Id. (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 2002), at Guideline 5(7); Id. (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 2008), at Guideline 5(7).Google Scholar
See World Medical Association (2002), supra note 9; Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (2008), supra note 10, at Guidelines 18 and 24.Google Scholar
UNESCO, International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, Res, G.A. 22 at 39; U.N. GAOR, 32nd Sess. (October 17, 2003), at s. 14(b); UNESCO, Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, G.A. Res 36, at 74, U.N. GAOR, 33rd Sess. (October 19, 2005), at s. 9; Human Genome Organization Ethics Committee, Statement on DNA Sampling: Control and Access, London, 1998, available at <http://www.hugo-international.org/img/dna_1998.pdf> (last visited August 19, 2011); Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Guidelines on Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases, Paris, 2009, at s. 7.F, available at <http://www.oecd.org/document/12/0,3343,en_2649_34537_40302092_1_1_1_1,00.html> (last visited August 19, 2011).Google Scholar
See World Medical Association (2002), supra note 9, at s. 19.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See UNESCO (2005), supra note 13, at s. 16.Google Scholar
UNESCO, Draft Report on the Collection, Treatment, Storage and Use of Genetic Data, Paris, 2002, at s. 31.Google Scholar
See World Health Organization (2003), supra note 9 at 23.Google Scholar
Id., at Rec. 13.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at 16.Google Scholar
Privacy Act, R.S.C. c. P-21.Google Scholar
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, S.C., c. 5 (2000).Google Scholar
See Privacy Act, supra note 22, at s. 3; see Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, supra note 23, at s. 2.Google Scholar
See Privacy Act, supra note 22.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 3 (m).Google Scholar
See Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, supra note 23.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 7 (3) (h) (ii).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 7 (3) (e).Google Scholar
See Privacy Act, supra note 22.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 8 (2) (m) (i).Google Scholar
Act respecting health services and social services, R.S.Q., ch. S-4.2.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 23.Google Scholar
Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, R.S.Q., ch. P-39.1.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 31.Google Scholar
See Act respecting health services and social services, supra note 33, at s. 23; see Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, supra note 35, at s. 31.Google Scholar
Réseau de Médecine Génétique Appliquée (RMGA), Statement of Principles: Human Genome Research, Quebec, 2000, available at <http://www.rmga.qc.ca/files/attachments/0000/0055/%C3%A9nonc%C3%A9_de_principes_recherche_en_g%C3%A9nomique_humaine_en.pdf> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
Id., at s. III (3).Google Scholar
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, Ottawa, 2010, available at <http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
Id., at s. 13.3 (b).Google Scholar
Id., at s. 13.3.Google Scholar
Liss c. Watters, 2010 QCCS 3309 (leave of appeal granted, CA #500-09-020-928-107).Google Scholar
Id., at par. 123.Google Scholar
Id., at par. 122.Google Scholar
Id., at par. 123.Google Scholar
Id., at par. 124.Google Scholar
Public Welfare, 45 C.F.R. 46 (2005).Google Scholar
Id., at s. 46.116 -117.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 46.107 -115 and 46.501–505.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 46.102 f).Google Scholar
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 (P.L.104–191).Google Scholar
See Public Welfare, supra note 48, at s. 160 and 164.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 164.306 (a) (1) and (3).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at s. 164.514 (a).Google Scholar
Id., at s. 164.502 (f).Google Scholar
Id., at s. 164.502 (g) (4).Google Scholar
American Medical Association, Opinion 5.051 - Confidentiality of Medical Information Postmortem, Chicago, 2000, available at <http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion5051.shtml> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Pate v. Threlkel, 661 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1995).Google Scholar
Id., at par. 29.Google Scholar
Id., at par. 30.Google Scholar
Safer v. Pack, 677 A.2d 1188 (NJ 1996).Google Scholar
Id., at par. 32.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Loi no 2004–800 du 6 août 2004 relative à la bioéthique [Bioethics Law], Journal Officiel de la République Française [Official Journal of French Republic] Gazette of France (July 29, 2004): at 14040.Google Scholar
Id., at s. L.1131.1.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Code de la santé publique [Public Health Code], Consolidated Version (Novembre 8, 2010).Google Scholar
Id., at s. L.1111–7.Google Scholar
Id., at s. L.1110–4.Google Scholar
Code civil [Civil Code], Consolidated Version (October 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Code de la recherche [Research Code], Consolidated Version (May 8, 2010).Google Scholar
Cour Administrative d'Appel de Paris, 3ème chambre [Administrative Appeal Court of Paris, 3rd Chamber] (February 2, 2008).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See UNESCO (2003), supra note 13, at s. 14(b); see UNESCO (2005), supra note 13, s.9; see Human Genome Organization Ethics Committee (1998), supra note 13; see Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009), supra note 13, at s. 7.F; see World Medical Association (2002), supra note 9, at s. 19.Google Scholar
See World Health Organization (2003), supra note 9, at rec. 13.Google Scholar
Binet, J.-R. Mazen, N.-J., “Éthique et droit du vivant” [Ethics and Rights of the Living], Revue générale de droit médical 37 (2010): 361–376, at 367.Google Scholar
Deleury, É. Goubau, D., Le droit des personnes physiques, 4e édition (Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2008): at 899.Google Scholar
As illustrated by the latin maxim, “Infans conceptus pro nato habetus, quoties de commodis ejus agitur,” which means that the conceived child is considered to be born wherever it is in his or her interest.Google Scholar
See Deleury, Gaoubau, , supra note 82.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B., Life Before Birth: The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992): At 24 and s.; Berg, J., “Grave Secrets: Legal and Ethical Analysis of Postmortem Confdentiality,” Connecticut Law Review 34 (2001): 81–122, at 91.Google Scholar
Id. (Berg), at 95.Google Scholar
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Belmont Report, Bethesda, 1979, available at <http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html> (last visited August 19, 2011).+(last+visited+August+19,+2011).>Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L. Childress, J. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Häyry, M. Chadwick, R., The Ethics and Governance of Human Genetic Databases: European Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, J. C., “On Harming the Dead,” Ethics 97, no. 2 (1987): 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Hooker, B., “Consequentialism,” in Skorupski, J., ed., The Routledge Companion to Ethics (New York: Routledge, 2010): at 444.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Rawls, , supra note 95.Google Scholar
Durand, G., Introduction générale à la bioéthique: Histoire, concepts et outils [General Introduction to Bioethics: History, Concepts and Tools] (Montreal: Éditions Fides, 1999): At 299.Google Scholar
See Berg, , supra note 86, at 94.Google Scholar
Id., at 108.Google Scholar
See Callahan, , supra note 93.Google Scholar
See UNESCO (2003), supra note 13, at s. 14(b); see UNESCO (2005), supra note 13, at s. 9; see Human Genome Organization Ethics Committee (1998), supra note 13; see Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009), supra note 13, at s. 7.F.Google Scholar
See World Medical Association (2002), supra note 9, at s. 19.Google Scholar
See World Health Organization (2003), supra note 9, at rec. 13.Google Scholar
James, D. S. Leadbeatter, S., “Confidentiality, Death and the Doctor,” Journal of Clinical Pathology 49, no. 1 (1996): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Callahan, , supra note 93.Google Scholar
See World Health Organization (2003), supra note 9.Google Scholar