Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T05:10:34.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consonnes et voyelles: les fonctions de l'Être et de l'Autre dans le Sophiste de Platon (251a–259e)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Fulcran Teisserenc
Fulcran Teisserenc
Affiliation:
Université Paris I Panthéon—Sorbonn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims at understanding the functions of the forms of Being and the Other in Plato's Sophist. In contrast with a linguistic interpretation purporting to draw a distinction between uses of the verb “to be,” I shed light on the ontological role ascribed to “the great genus” in the interweaving of forms. Focusing on the vowel analogy, I argue that the roles of Being and the Other respectively are that of a connector and a separator actualizing the participations and the differences between the forms. The outcome of this analysis is to offer an explanation of the dialectical methods described in that dialogue in a rather obscure, abstract way; the much-debated question of self-predication can be settled without recourse to selfparticipation.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , Spring 2007 , pp. 231 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Réferences bibliographique

Ackrill, John 1955 «ΣΥΜΠΛΟΚΗ ΕΙΔΩΝ», Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, vol. 2, p. 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackrill, John 1957 «Plato and the Copula: Sophist 251–59», Journal of Hellenic Studies, vol. 77, p. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluck, Richard 1957 «False Statements in the Sophist», Journal of Hellenic Studies, vol. 77, p. 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondeson, William 1976 «Some Problems about Being and Predication in Plato's Sophist 242–249», Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 14, p. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostock, David 1984 «Plato on “Is Not”», Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 2, p. 89–119.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc 1994 Platon, Le Parménide, traduction inédite, introduction et notes, Paris, Flammarion.Google Scholar
Brown, Leslie 1999 «Being in the Sophist: A Syntactical Enquiry», dans G. Fine, dir., Plato 1, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 475–478.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques 1985 «Le problème de la “Self-participation” chez Platon», dans A. Cazenave et J.-F. Lyotard, dir., L'Art des confins, Mélanges offerts à Maurice de Gandillac, Paris, Presses Universitaires du France, p. 121–135.Google Scholar
Cherniss, Harold 1957 «The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato's Later Dialogues», American Journal of Philology, vol. 78, p. 225–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordero, Nestor 2000 «La participation comme être de la Forme dans le Sophiste de Platon», dans N. Cordero, dir., Ontologie et Dialogue, Hommage à Pierre Aubenque, Paris, Vrin, p. 33–46.Google Scholar
Cornford, Francis M. 1935 Plato's Theory of Knowledge, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Crombie, Ian MacHattie 1971 «Duff-Forbes on Republic X», Mind, vol. 80, p. 286–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixsaut, Monique 2001 Métamorphoses de la dialectique dans les Dialogues de Platon, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Duff-Forbes, D. R. 1968 «The Regress Argument in Plato's Republic», Mind, vol. 77, p. 406–410.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, Francisco 1995 «L'être et la participation de l'autre. Une nouvelle ontologie dans le Sophiste», Les Études philosophiques, no 3, p. 311–353.Google Scholar
Gomez-Lobo, Alonso 1977 «Plato's Description of Dialectic in the Sophist253 d 1-e 2», Phronesis, vol. 22, p. 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Lobo, Alonso 1980 «Dialectic in the Sophist: A Reply to Waletzki», Phronesis, vol. 26, p. 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinaman, Robert 1981 «Self-Predication in the Sophist», Phronesis, vol. 26, p. 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinaman, Robert 1983 «Being in the Sophist», Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 65, no 1, p. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketchum, Richard J. 1978 «Participation and Predication in the Sophist», Phronesis, vol. 23, p. 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostman, James 1989 «The Ambiguity of “Partaking” in Plato's Sophist», Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 27, p. 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Frank A. 1975 «Did Plato Discover the estin of Identity?», California Studies in Classical Antiquity, vol. 8, p. 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, John 1967 «Plato's Analysis of τ ν and τ μ ν in the Sophist», Phronesis, vol. 12, p. 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, John 1985 «Vlastos on Pauline Predication», Phronesis, vol. 30, p. 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, K. W. 1973 «Crombie on Rep. 597c», Mind, vol. 82, p. 602–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, John 1960 «ΣΥΜΠΛΟΚΗ ΕΙΔΩΝ and the Genesis of ΛΟΓΟΣ», Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 42, p. 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, John 1962 «Being and Meaning in the Sophist», Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 14, p. 23–78.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander 1982–1983 «Participation and Predication in Plato's Later Thought», Review of Metaphysics, vol. 36, p. 343–376.Google Scholar
Nerlich, C. C. 1960 «Regress Arguments in Plato», Mind, vol. 69, p. 88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Gwil E. L. 1970 «Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms», dans Owen, G. E. L., dir., Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics, Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Owen, Gwil E. L. 1971 «Plato on Not-Being», dans Vlastos, G., dir., Plato, A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. 1, New York, Doubleday Anchor, p. 223–267.Google Scholar
Ross, David 1951 Plato's Theory of Ideas, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, Walter 1962 Plato's Later Epistemology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Julius 1940 Plato's Method of Dialectic, English translation by Allan, D. J., Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trevaskis, J. R. 1966 «The μέγιστα γένη and the Vowel Analogy of Plato, Sophist 253», Phronesis, vol. 11, p. 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevaskis, J. R. 1967 «Division and Its Relation to Dialectic and Ontology in Plato», Phronesis, vol. 12, p. 118–129.Google Scholar
Van Eck, J. 2000 «Plato's Logical Insights: On Sophist 254 d-257 a», Ancient Philosophy, vol. 20, no 1, p. 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory 1954 «The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides», The Philosophical Review, vol. 63, p. 319–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory 1981a «An Ambiguity in the Sophist», dans Platonic Studies, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1981, p. 270–322.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory 1981b «The “Two Level Paradoxes” in Aristotle», dans Platonic Studies, p. 323–334.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory 1981c «Self-Predication and Self-Participation in Plato's Later Period», dans Platonic Studies, p. 335–341.Google Scholar