Skip to main content
Log in

Twilight Of The Perfect Model Model

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, P. W.: 1972, ‘More is Different’, Science 177, 393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyang, S.: 1999, Foundations of Complex-System Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, John: 1980, ‘Optimal Design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology’, Philosophy of Science pp. 532–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, John: 1981, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?’, in P. D Asquith and R. G Giere (eds), PSA 1980: Proceedings of the 1980 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol.2, (East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association), pp. 397–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, John: 1991, Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, John: 1994, ‘Theories of Everything’, in Jan Hilgevoord (ed.), Physics and Our View of the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1994, ‘Fundamentalism vs The Patchwork of Laws’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, pp. 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1995, ‘The Metaphysics of the Disunified World’, in D. Hull and M. Forbes (eds), PSA 1994, vol. II: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 357–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1997, ‘Models: The Blueprints for Laws’, Philosophy of Science, pp. S292–S303.

  • Cartwright, N., T. Shomar and M. Suarez: 1995, ‘The Tool Box of Science’, in W. Herfel et al. (eds), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavelin, M.: 1974, The Natural Philosophy of Galileo, translated by A. J. Pomeran, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine J. and Peter Galison: 1992, ‘The Image of Objectivity,’ Representations, pp. 81–128.

  • Daves, Paul: 1988, The Cosmic Blueprint, Touchstone, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Paul (ed.): 1989, The New Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, translated by P. Wiener, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1986, The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R., R. Leighton and M. Sands: 1963, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R.: 1965, The Character of Physical Law, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, Murray: 1994, The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex, Little, Brown and Company, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R: 1979, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, Second edition, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R: 1985, ‘Constructive Realism’, in P. Churchland and C. Hooker (eds), Images of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1988a, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R: 1988b, ‘Laws, Theories, and Generalizations’, in A. Grunbaum and W. C. Salmon (eds), The Limits of Deductivisim, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1995, ‘The Skeptical Perspective: Science without Laws of Nature’, in F. Weinert (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 120–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.: to appear, ‘Models and Idealized Systems’.

  • Koertge, N.: 1977, ‘Galileo and the Problem of Accidents’, Journal of the History of Ideas, pp. 389–408.

  • Kant, I.: 1783, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that will be Able to Present Itself as a Science, Riga, Hartknoch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, S.: 1814, Essai Philosophique Sur Les Probabilities, Courcier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David: 1974, ‘Popper's Qualitative Theory of Verisimilitude’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, pp. 166–77.

  • McMullin, E: 1985, ‘Galilean Idealization’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, pp. 247–273.

  • Niiniluoto, Ilkka: 1999, ‘Verisimilitude: The Third Period’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, pp. 1–29.

  • Popper, Sir Karl: 1972, Conjectures and Refutations, 4th Edition, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnan, H.: 1975, ‘Philosophy and Our Mental Life’, in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, Michael: 1980, ‘Models in Physics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, pp. 145–163.

  • Redhead, Michael: 1989, ‘Physics for Pedestrians: An Inaugural Lecture’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, Michael: 1995, From Physics to Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, Michael: 1999, ‘Quantum Field Theory and the Philosopher’, in Tian Yu Cao (ed.), Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1984, The Limits of Science, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.: 1986a, ‘Models and Scientific Idealizations’, in P. Weingartner and G. Dorn (eds), Sonderdruck aus Foundations of Biology, A selection of Papers Contributed to the Biology Section of the 7th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Verlag Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.: 1986, ‘Models and Scientific Explanations’, Philosophica, pp. 59–72.

  • Savage, W.: to appear, ‘The 'semantic’ conception of theories'.

  • Scrivin, M.: 1961, ‘The Key Property of Physical Laws - Inaccuracy’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, Holt, Rinehart andWinston, New York, pp. 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D: 1969, ‘Notes Toward a Post-Positivistic Interpretation of Science’, in P. Achinstein and S. Barker (eds), The Legacy of Logical Positivism, pp. 115–60.

  • Suppe, F: 1989, The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, Abner: 1993, Search for a Naturalistic World View, vol. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Peter: 1998, ‘Approximate Truth and Dynamical Theories’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, pp. 253–277.

  • Suppes, P.: 1961, ‘A Comparison of the Meaning and Use of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences’, in The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 163–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1962, ‘Models of Data’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds), Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 252–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P: 1967, ‘What is a Scientific Theory?’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today, Basic Books, ondon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1995, An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1985, ‘Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science’, in P. Churchland and C. Hooker (eds), Images of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1987, ‘The Semantic Approach to Scientific Theories’, in N. J. Nersessian (ed.), The Process of Science, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1991, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Steven: 1993, Dreams of a Final Theory, Hutchinson Radius, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.: 1985, ‘What Can Theory Tell Us about Observation?’, in P. M. Churchland and C. A. Hooker (eds), Images of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 222–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teller, P. Twilight Of The Perfect Model Model. Erkenntnis 55, 393–415 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013349314515

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013349314515

Keywords

Navigation