Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health Promotion or Disease Prevention: A Real Difference for Public Health Practice?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It appears that there are two distinct practices within public health, namely health promotion and disease prevention, leading to different goals. But does the distinction hold? Can we promote health without preventing disease, and vice versa? The aim of the paper is to answer these questions. First, the central concepts are defined and the logical relations between them are spelt out. A preliminary conclusion is that there is a logical difference between health and disease, which makes health promotion and disease prevention two distinct endeavours. However, since disease is defined in relation to health, as those kinds of internal processes and states that typically lead to ill health, the difference is smaller than it might appear. Second, in order to answer the practical question whether it is possible to promote health without preventing disease, and vice versa, several kinds of public health interventions are discussed. The conclusion is that while health promotion and disease prevention can be distinguished conceptually, they can hardly be distinguished in practice. Most general measures do both at the same time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. State, here, typically refers to a lesion, i.e. a permanent damage of some internal structure, for example, the neural damage caused by a stroke [32].

  2. Talking about defect prevention would not make much sense since most defects are inborn. However, if we have the option of genetic manipulation we might include this type of intervention in prevention.

  3. Immunizing could, of course, equally well be described as disease prevention. However, the distinction between direct and indirect manipulation of disease can hardly be made within prevention, since, apart from the examples given (and perhaps some kinds of genetic manipulations), such manipulations would be equivalent to treatment.

  4. This assumes, as the definition requires, that the cause of the well-being is an internal state, which can be argued for. As soon as the alcohol has been absorbed by the body and is released into the bloodstream we can say that the state is internal.

  5. Note also that we might not see any good reason to reduce moderate drinking in order to maintain manifest health, since, on the whole, the quality-of-life increases that people gain from drinking (moderately) might trump the negative (manifest) health effects of alcohol.

  6. One dilemma in population-based strategies, pertinent here, is that there might be a U-shaped curve relating units of alcohol consumed and longevity, at least for men over 60. If this is true, it means that if we succeed in moving the whole population distribution of alcohol down, we might end up with some people being negatively affected by this, assuming that the hypothesis that a small amount of alcohol (or red wine) is beneficial for health is correct (see [30]).

  7. Screening is sometimes categorized as secondary prevention (e.g. [28]).

  8. Note, however, that we should only promote those health changes which, directly or indirectly, contribute to quality of life [33].

References

  1. About.com:Sports Medicine. (2008) http://sportsmedicine.about.com/od/injuryprevention/a/Ex_Immunity.htm 2008-11-07.

  2. Abrahamson, L., Andersson, A., Becker, W., & Nilsson, G. (Eds.). (2006). Näringslära: För högkolan [Nutrition: For the University]. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beaglehole, R., & Bonita, R. (2004). Public health at the crossroads: Achievements and prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brülde, B., & Tengland, P.-A. (2003). Hälsa och Sjukdom: En begreppslig utredning [Health and illness: A conceptual investigation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bryan, J., Calvaresi, E., & Hughes, D. (2001). Foods for thinking and memory. Food Australia, 53, 477–479.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchanan, D. (2000). An ethic for health promotion: Rethinking the sources of human well-being. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cleveland Clinic. (2008). http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/Chronic_Fatigue_Syndrome/hic_Diet_Exercise_Stress_and_the_Immune_System.aspx 2008-11-07.

  8. Culver, C. M., & Gert, B. (1982). Philosophy in medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, M., & Macdowall, W. (2006). Health promotion theory. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Earle, S., Lloyd, C. E., Sidell, M., & Spurr, S. (2007). Theory and research in promoting public health. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis, J. M., & Reddy, P. (2002). Effects of Panax ginseng on quality of life. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 36, 375–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garfinkel, D., Laudon, M., Nof, D., & Zisapel, N. (1995). Improvement of sleep quality in elderly people by controlled-release melatonin. Lancet, 346, 541–544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland, S. (2007). Public health ethics. Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hummel, T., & Nordin, S. (2008). Quality of life in olfactory dysfunction. http://www.senseofsmell.org/feature/whitepaper/whitepaper_print.html 2008-11-08.

  15. Korp, P. (2004). Hälsopromotion [Health promotion]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lalonde, M. (1974). A new perspective on the health of Canadians. Ottawa: Information Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laverack, G. (2004). Health promotion practice. Power and empowerment. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lindstrand, A., Bergström, S., Rosling, H., Rubenson, B., Stenson, B., & Tylleskär, T. (2006). Global health: An introductory textbook. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald, T. (1998). Rethinking health promotion: A global approach. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. MayoClinic. (2008). http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/exercise/HQ01676 2008-11-07.

  21. McKeown, T. (1979). The role of medicine. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. NCI (National Cancer Institute). (2008). http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/overview 2008-11-09.

  23. NNII (National Network for Immunization Information). (2008). http://www.immunizationinfo.org/immunization_issues_detail.cfv?id=140 2008-11-09.

  24. Nordenfelt, L. (1991). Towards a theory of health promotion: A logical analysis. Linköping: Linköping University Press.

  25. Nordenfelt, L. (1995). On the nature of health: An action-theoretic approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Second revised edition.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nordenfelt, N. (1998). On medicine and other kinds of health enhancement. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 1, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nutbeam, D (1998). Health Promotion Glossary. WHO/HPR/HEP/98/1. (See also: http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/hp_glossary_en.pdf) (on behalf of the WHO).

  28. Pellmer, K., & Wramner, B. (2002). Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap [Basic public health]. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raeburn, J., & Rootman, I. (1998). People-centered health promotion. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rose, G. (2008). Rose’s strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Seedhouse, D. (1997). Health promotion: Philosophy, prejudice and practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Svanström, L. (2003). Sjukdomslära [Pathology]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tengland, P.-A. (2006). The goals of health work: Quality of life, health and welfare. Philosophy, Medicine and Health Care: A European Journal, 9(2), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tengland, P.-A. (2007). A two-dimensional theory of health. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 28(4), 257–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tengland, P.-A. (2008). Empowerment: A conceptual discussion. Health Care Analysis, 16(2), 77–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tengland, P-A. (2009). Health promotion and disease prevention: Logically different conceptions? Health Care Analysis. doi:10.1007/s10728-009-0125-0.

  37. Tones, K., & Green, J. (2004). Health promotion: Planning and strategies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  38. WHO. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  39. WHO. (1990). Some options for improving nutrition in the 1990s. http://www.unsystem.org/scn/archives/scnnews07supplement/begin.htm#Contents 2008-11-09.

  40. Willemse, B. W., Postma, D. S., Timens, W., & ten Hacken, N. H. (2004). The impact of smoking cessation on respiratory symptoms, lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation. The European Respiratory Journal, 23, 464–476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Lennart Nordenfelt, Bengt Brülde, Glenn Laverack, Karin Dahlbäck, the anonymous reviewer, and the participants of “the higher seminar” at IHS, Linköping university, Sweden, for valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per-Anders Tengland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tengland, PA. Health Promotion or Disease Prevention: A Real Difference for Public Health Practice?. Health Care Anal 18, 203–221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-009-0124-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-009-0124-1

Keywords

Navigation