Skip to main content
Log in

The Collaborative Enterprise

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instead of the currently prevailing competitive model, a more collaborative strategy is needed to address the concerns related to the unsustainability of today’s business. This article aims to explore collaborative approaches where enterprises seek to build long-term, mutually beneficial relationships with all stakeholders and want to produce sustainable values for their whole business ecosystem. Cases here analyzed demonstrate that alternative ways of doing business are possible. These enterprises share more democratic ownership structures, more balanced and broader governance systems, and a more comprehensive view of organizational goals and performance – which goes beyond the narrow concept of financial bottom line and into a stronger and systematic care of the needs and requirements of the different stakeholder groups. Thanks to this evidence and different theoretical and empirical contributions, we suggest that the strength and sustainability of enterprises come from their ability to fit into the environmental, social, and cultural context in which they operate. By creating values for all stakeholders, enterprises can involve them and gain deep support based on their commitment. This may lead to superior performance from a multiple-bottom-line perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANCC-COOP (National Association of Consumer Cooperatives): 2005, Rapporto Sociale 2004 del Sistema Coop Nazionale, http://www.e-coop.it

  • ANCC-COOP (National Association of Consumer Cooperatives): 2006, Rapporto Sociale 2005 del Sistema Coop Nazionale, http://www.e-coop.it

  • ANCC-COOP (National Association of Consumer Cooperatives): 2007, Terzo Rapporto Sociale Nazionale 2006 della Cooperazione di Consumatori, http://www.e-coop.it

  • Birkinshaw J., G. Piramal (eds.) 2005, Sumantra Ghoshal on Management: A Force for Good (Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, L.: 2002, ‹Humanity in Business’, Paper Presented at the European Ethics Summit, Brussels, Belgium, August 29–30

  • Bowie, N. E.: 2006, ‹Stakeholder Dialogues as a Governance Mechanism’, Paper Presented at the Fourth TransAtlantic Business Ethics Conference, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PA, October 6–7

  • Brugmann J., C. K. Prahalad 2007, Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact, Harvard Business Review 85(2), 80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson M. B. E. 1995 A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen B., M. Warwick 2006, Values-Driven Business: How to Change the World, Make Money, and Have Fun (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumatori: 2006, ‹Coop, Ecco il Rapporto Sociale 2005’, Consumatori 6, 11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumatori: 2007, ‹Prodotti Pieni di Valori e Convenienza’, Consumatori 6, 22–25

  • Coop Adriatica: 2004, 03 Bilancio di Sostenibilità (Coop Adriatica, Villanova di Castenaso, Bologna, Italy)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coop Adriatica: 2007, Bilancio di Sostenibilità ‹06 (Coop Adriatica, Villanova di Castenaso, Bologna, Italy)

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., L. E. Preston: 1995, The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer J. H., H. Singh: 1998, The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4), 660–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández P.: 2002, Valuation Methods and Shareholder Value Creation (Academic Press, San Diego, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank R. H.: 2004, What Price the Moral High Ground? Ethical Dilemmas in Competitive Environments (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Oxford, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E., K. Martin, B. Pramar: 2007, Stakeholder Capitalism, Journal of Business Ethics 74(4), 303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, reprinted in Hartman, L. P. (ed.): 2005, Perspectives in Business Ethics, 3rd Edition (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY), pp. 280–285

  • Garriga E., D. Melé: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, Journal of Business Ethics 53(1–2), 51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S.: 2005, Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices, Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1), 75–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. C., W. H. Meckling: 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay J.: 2004, Everlasting Light Bulbs: How Economics Illuminates the World (The Erasmus Press, London, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J., A. Silberston: 1995, Corporate Governance, National Institute Economic Review 153(1), 84–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern I., S. Sachs, E. Rühli: 2007, Stakeholder Relations and Maintaining the Licence to Operate: A Comparative Case Study of the Swiss Telecommunications Industry, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 7(4), 446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letza S., X. Sun, J. Kirkbride: 2004, Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: A Critical Review of Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance: An International Review 12(3), 242–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak T.: 2007, Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital, Journal of Business Ethics 74(4), 329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meglioli R.: 2001, Reti sociali e valori aziendali (Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills R. W., B. Weinstein: 2000, Beyond Shareholder Value – Reconciling the Shareholder and Stakeholder Perspectives, Journal of General Management 25(3), 79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F., A. Tencati: 2006, Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: The Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems, Business Strategy and the Environment 15(5), 296–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E., M. R. Kramer: 2002, The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy, Harvard Business Review 80(12), 56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E., M. R. Kramer: 2006, Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review 84(12), 78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J. E., L. E. Preston, S. Sachs: 2002a, Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review 45(1), 6–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J. E., L. E. Preston, S. Sachs: 2002b, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport A.: 1986, Creating Shareholder Value: The New Standard for Business Performance (The Free Press, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport A.: 1998, Creating Shareholder Value: A Guide for Managers and Investors (The Free Press, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigling Gallagher D., J. W. Gallagher: 2007, Stakeholder Relationship Management: A Strategic Resource for Sustainability, Finanza Marketing e Produzione 3, 28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S. A.: 1973, The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem, American Economic Review 63, 134–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Slow Food: 2007, http://www.slowfood.com/

  • Social Accountability International (SAI): 2007, http://www.sa-intl.org/

  • Stiglitz J. E.: 2003, The Roaring Nineties (W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tencati A., F. Perrini: 2006, The Sustainability Perspective: A New Governance Model, in A. Kakabadse, M. Morsing (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Reconciling Aspiration with Application (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, UK, New York, NY), pp. 94–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek S., J. Sabapathy, H. Døssing, T. Swift: 2003, Responsible Competitiveness: Corporate Responsibility Clusters in Action (The Copenhagen Centre & AccountAbility, Copenhagen, Denmark, London, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsolnai L.: 2003, The Paradox of Business Ethics, European Business Forum 13, 90–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsolnai, L.: 2006, ‹Nature, Society and Future Generations’, Paper Presented at the Globalization and the Common Good International Workshop, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France, September 17–18

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Tencati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tencati, A., Zsolnai, L. The Collaborative Enterprise. J Bus Ethics 85, 367–376 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9775-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9775-3

Keywords

Navigation