Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Struggling Between Strength and Vulnerability, a Patients’ Counter Story

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, patients are expected to take control over their health and their life and act as independent users and consumers. Simultaneously, health care policy demands patients are expected to self manage their disease. This article critically questions whether this is a realistic expectation. The paper presents the auto-ethnographic narrative of the first author, which spans a period of 27 years, from 1985 to 2012. In total nine episodes were extracted from various notes, conversations and discussions in an iterative process. Each of these episodes was condensed around a ‘critical moment’ as perceived by the “self”. The critical moments in the illness process vary between newly encountered problems with basic needs and mourning, to renewed strength and the desire to grow, embracing new situations. Being confronted with and living with a chronic illness involves periods of anxiety and self centredness alternating with strength and advocating the interests of peer-patients. These episodes of emotion, confusion and refinding a balance have a cyclic pattern. The narrative illustrates the vulnerability and dependency of a patient with a chronic disease. The discussion relates this to mainstream dominant views on patients ‘in control of their own life’. The narrative illustrates, that the vulnerability and dependency of the patient are key factors to take into account in health care policy. The narrative provides a counter story, challenging current thinking in terms of strength, selfmanagement, patients’ own control and independent role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alakeson, V. (2011). Active patient. The case for self-direction in healthcare. Policy paper 05.01.2011. University of Birmingham.

  2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Badcott, D. (2005). The expert patient: Valid recognition or false hope? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8(2), 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes, M., & Cotterell, P. (2012). Critical perspectives on user involvement. Bristol: The Policy Press, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barry, C. A., Bradley, C. P., Britten, N., Stevenson, F. A., & Barber, N. (2000). Patients’ unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 320(7244), 1246–1250.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, P. H. (1993). Common pitfalls in published grounded theory research. Qualitative Health Research, 3(2), 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boivin, A., Green, J., van der Meulen, J., Légaré, F., & Nolte, E. (2009). Why consider patients’preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guidance developers. Medical Care, 2009(47), 908–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caron-Flinterman, J. F. (2005). A new voice in science: Patient participation in decision making on biomedical research (thesis). Amsterdam: VU-Free University.

  9. Charon, R. (2001). Narrative medicine. A model for empathy, reflection, profession and trust. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(15), 1897–1902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox, K., Stevenson, F., Britten, N., & Dundar, Y. (2003). A systematic review of communication between patients and healthcare professionals about medicine taking and prescribing. London: GKT Concordance Unit, King’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Klerk, M. (2000). Rapportage gehandicapten 2000. Arbeidsmarktpositie en financiële situatie van mensen met beperkingen en/of chronische ziekten. Den Haag: SCP.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elberse, J. E., Caron-Flinterman, J. F., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2011). Patient-expert partnerships in research: How to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives. Health Expectations, 14(3), 225–239. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00647.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2003). An introduction to the arts and narrative research: Art as inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 506–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Article 10.

  15. European Committee (EC). (2012). Eurobarometer qualitative study patient involvement.

  16. Goldsmith, D. J., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2006). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 234–263. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00757.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gouyet, J.-F. (1996). Physics and fractal structures. Paris, New York: Masson Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-94153-0.

    Google Scholar 

  18. GR/RVZ Gezondheidsraad/Raad voor volksgezondheid en zorg. (2012). Toekomstverkenning Ethiek en Gezondheid. Signalering Ethiek en Gezondheid, 2.

  19. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

  20. Hoeymans, N., Schellevis, F. C., & Wolters, I. (2008). Hoeveel mensen hebben één of meer chronische ziekten? In Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM. http://www.nationaalkompas.nl.

  21. Kapitein, P. (2011). Ik Heb Kanker … En Ik Leef Een Goed, Gelukkig En Gezond Leven! Uithoorn: Karakter Uitgevers. ISBN 10 906112929X.

  22. Kübler-Ross, E. (1970). On death and dying. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lindhout, P., Swuste, P., Teunissen, G. J., & Ale, B. J. M. (2012). The multilingual shop floor and safe work. A deprived area in European Union policy making. European Journal for Language Policy, 4(2), 137–169. doi:10.3828/ejlp.2012.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation.

  25. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality.

  26. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meulenkamp, T., Van der Hoek, L., & Cardol, M. (2011). Deelname aan de samenleving van mensen met een beperking en ouderen. Rapportage participatiemonitor 2011. Utrecht: NIVEL.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Newman, S., Steed, L., & Mulligan, K. (2004). Self-management interventions for chronic illness. The Lancet, 2004(364), 1523–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Polletta, F. (1998). Contending stories: Narrative in social movements. Qualitative Sociology, 21(4), 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Say, R., & Thompson, R. (2003). The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—Challenges for doctors. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 542–545.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sperry, D. E., & Sperry, L. L. (2011). Listening to all of the words: Reassessing the verbal environments of young, low income children. In Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal (March 31–April 2).

  33. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stoll, C., Kapfhammer, H. P., Haller, H., Briegel, J., Krauseneck, T., Durst, K., et al. (1999). Sensitivity and specificity of a screening test to document traumatic experiences and to diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder in patients after intensive care treatment. Intensive Care Medicine, 25, 697–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Svenaeus, F. (2000). The body uncanny—Further steps towards a phenomenology of illness. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 3(2), 125–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Teunissen, G. J., & Abma, T. A. (2010). Derde partij: tussen droom en daad. Een verkennend onderzoek naar de patienten partij en -criteria voor onderzoek, beleid en kwaliteit bij overheden en zorginstellingen. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Gezondheidszorg, 4, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Toombs, S. K. (1990). The meaning of illness: A phenomenological approach to the patient physician relationship. Doctor thesis. TX: Rice University.

  40. Trappenburg, M. (2008). Genoeg is genoeg. Over gezondheidszorg en democratie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.

  41. Trimbos instituut. (2011). Trendrapport GGZ. Het bieden van psychosociale zorg bij lichamelijk chronische zieken. Utrecht: Trimbos.

  42. Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Boston: First Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-00414-0.

    Google Scholar 

  43. van de Bovenkamp, H. M. (2010). The limits of patients power. Examining active citizenship in Dutch health care. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

    Google Scholar 

  44. van den Brink-Muinen, A., & Rijken, M., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Heijmans, M. W. J. M. (2009). Kerngegevens Maatschappelijke Situatie 2008. Nationaal Panel Chronisch zieken en Gehandicapten. Utrecht: NIVEL (in Dutch).

  45. Walker, L. S., Smith, C. A., Garber, J., & Claar, R. L. (2007). Appraisal and coping with daily stressors by pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(2), 206–216. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsj124.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. WHO. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO/NMH/11.01.

  47. Williamson, C. (2010). Towards the emancipation of patients. Patients’ experiences and the patient movement (p. 23). Bristol: The Policy Press. ISBN 9781847427441.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Humanities EMGO+, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    G. J. Teunissen, M. A. Visse & T. A. Abma

  2. Lung Fund Netherlands, Amersfoort, The Netherlands

    G. J. Teunissen

Authors
  1. G. J. Teunissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Visse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. A. Abma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. J. Teunissen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teunissen, G.J., Visse, M.A. & Abma, T.A. Struggling Between Strength and Vulnerability, a Patients’ Counter Story. Health Care Anal 23, 288–305 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-013-0254-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-013-0254-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation