Skip to main content
Log in

Concepts and conceptual change

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that questions concerning the nature of concepts that are central in cognitive psychology are also important to epistemology and that there is more to conceptual change than mere belief revision. Understanding of epistemic change requires appreciation of the complex ways in which concepts are structured and organized and of how this organization can affect belief revision. Following a brief summary of the psychological functions of concepts and a discussion of some recent accounts of what concepts are, I propose a view of concepts as complex computational structures. This account suggests that conceptual change can come in varying degrees, with the most extreme consisting of fundamental conceptual reorganizations. These degrees of conceptual change are illustrated by the development of the concept of an acid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, S., L. Gleitman and H. Gleitman: 1983, ‘What Some Concepts Might Not Be’, Cognition 13, 263–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S.: 1985, Conceptual Change in Childhood, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.: 1986, Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1975, Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1986, Change in View: Principles of Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1987, ‘(Nonsolopsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics’, in E. LePore (ed.), Semantics of Natural Language, Academic Press, New York, 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., K. Holyoak, R. Nisbett and P. Thagard: 1986, Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. and P. Thagard: 1989, ‘Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction’, Cognitive Science 13, 295–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1970, Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (first published 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1988, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., C. Fellbaum, J. Kegl and K. Miller: 1988, ‘WORDNET: An Electronic Lexical Reference System Based on Theories of Lexical Memory’, Revue Québécoise Linguistique 17, 181–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. and P. Johnson-Laird: 1976, Language and Perception, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M.: 1975, ‘A Framework for Representing Knowledge’, in P. H. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 211–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L. and D. L. Medin: 1985, ‘The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence’, Psychological Review 92, 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, M. and P. Thagard: 1988, ‘Explanatory Coherence and Belief Revision in Naive Physics’, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 426–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., P. Smolensky, G. Hinton and J. McClelland: 1986, ‘Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models’, in J. McClelland and D. Rumelhart (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition Vol. 2, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 7–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambursky, S.: 1956, The Physical World of the Greeks, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.: (1989), ‘Concepts and Inductions’, in M. Posner (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1984a, ‘Conceptual Combination and Scientific Discovery’, in P. Asquith and P. Kitcher (eds.), PSA 1984, Vol. 1. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1984b, ‘Frames, Knowledge, and Inference’, Synthese 61, 233–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1988, Computational Philosophy of Science, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Coherence’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, 435–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: (in press), ‘The Conceptual Structure of the Chemical Revolution’, Philosophy of Science.

  • Thagard, P., K. Holyoak, G. Nelson and D. Gochfeld: 1990, ‘Analogical Retrieval by Constraint Satisfaction’, Artificial Intelligence in press.

  • Walden, P.: 1929, Salts, Acids and Bases, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, M. and S. Carey: 1983, ‘When Heat and Temperature Were One’, in D. Gentner and A. Stevens (eds.), Mental Models, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 267–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to Michael Ranney and Gilbert Harman for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thagard, P. Concepts and conceptual change. Synthese 82, 255–274 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413664

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413664

Keywords

Navigation