Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bad Apples, Bad Barrels, and Broken Followers? An Empirical Examination of Contextual Influences on Follower Perceptions and Reactions to Aversive Leadership

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on destructive leadership has largely focused on leader characteristics thought to be responsible for harmful organizational outcomes. Recent findings, however, demonstrate the need to examine important contextual factors underlying such processes. Thus, the present study sought to determine the effects of an organization’s climate and financial performance, as well as the leader’s gender, on subordinate perceptions of and reactions (i.e., whistle-blowing intentions) to aversive leadership, a form of destructive leadership based on coercive power. 302 undergraduate participants read through a series of vignettes describing a fictional organization, its employees, and an aversive leader in charge of the company’s sales department. They were then asked to envision themselves as subordinates of the leader and respond to several quantitative measures and open-ended questions. Consistent with Padilla and colleagues' (2007) toxic triangle theory, results suggest that both perceptions and reactions to aversive leadership depend on the three aforementioned factors. Specifically, aversive leaders were perceived more aversively and elicited greater whistle-blowing intentions in financially unstable organizations possessing climates intolerant of negative leader behavior. Moreover, female aversive leaders were perceived more aversively than their male counterparts under such conditions. Theoretical and practical implications as well as future research directions are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 4, 755-778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balthazard, P.A., Cooke, R.A., & Potter, R.E. (2006). Dysfunctional culture, dysfunctional organization: Capturing the behavioral norms that form organizational culture and drive performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 8, 709-732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self- efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 199-207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedell-Avers, K. E., S. T. Hunter and M. D. Mumford: in press, ‘Leader Errors: An Examination of the Implication’, The Leadership Quarterly.

  • Bernardez, T. (1983). Women in authority: Psychodynamic and interactional aspects. Social Work with Groups, 6, 43-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, M.C., Kohles, J.C., Pearce, C.L., Justin, J.E., & Stovall, J.F. (2007). When the romance is over: Follower perspectives of aversive leadership. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 528-557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boldry, J., Wood, W., & Kashy, D.A. (2001). Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 689-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotheridge, C.M., & Lee, R.T. (2006). Examining the relationship between the perceived work environment and workplace bullying. Canadian Journal Community Mental Health, 25, 31-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P.J., Stets, J.E., & Cerven, C. (2007). Gender, legitimation, and identity verification in groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 27-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P.G., & Fleishman, J.A. (1987). Linking intentions and behavior: Australian students’ college plans and college attendance. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 79-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998) Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity and Compliance. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Gardner L (eds) The Handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, pp. 151–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M.B. (1983). Corporate ethics and crime: The role of middle management. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J.A. (1998). The Dark Side of Leadership. In G.R. Hickman (Eds.), Leading Organizations: Perspectives for a New Era. (pp. 250-260). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rivera, J., Kurrien, R., & Olsen, N. (2007). The emotional climate of nations and their culture of pace. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 255-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, R.E., Roe, R.A., & Taillieu, T.C.B. (1998). Need for supervision: Its impact on leadership effectiveness. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34, 486-501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M. W., Resick, C. J., & Hanges, P. J. (2006). When organizational climate is unambiguous, it is also strong. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 351-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M.K., Ganster, D., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social Undermining in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331-351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex Differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H. (2003). The rise of female leaders. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 123- 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H., & Carli, L.L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., & van Engen, M.L. (2003). Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H. & Karau, S.J. (2002). Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G.R., Zinko, R., Brouer, R.L., Buckley, M.R, & Harvey, M.G. (2007). Strategic bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 195-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P.J. (2004). Handling toxic emotions: New challenges for leaders and their organization. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 111-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandossy, R., & Sonnenfeldt, J.A. (2004). Leadership and governance from the inside out. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 491- 512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomb, T.M., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (2006). High toxicity leadership: Borderline personality disorder and the dysfunctional organization. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 733-746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, L.J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative. Work & Stress, 21, 220-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M.E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657- 674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J., & Martell, R.F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10, 237-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J., Martell, R.F., & Simon, M.C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935-942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., Raskin, R., Fazzini, D. (1990). The dark side of charisma. In K.E. Clark, & M.B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of Leadership (pp. 343-354). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J. & Howell, J.M. (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 3, 81-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S.T., Bedell-Avers, K.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2007). The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 435-446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennifer, D., H. Cowie and K. Ananiadou: 2003, `Perceptions and Experience of Workplace Bullying in Five Different Working Populations', Aggressive Behavior 29, 489–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J.L., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627-647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J.P. (2002). Whistleblowing: A study of managerial differences. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 14, 17-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S.C. (2005). Evaluative affect display toward male and female leaders of task- oriented groups. Small Group Research, 36, 678-703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F.J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personnel decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 379-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengnick-Hall, M.L. (1995). Sexual harassment research: A methodological critique. Personnel Psychology, 48, 841-864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (2008). Following toxic leaders: In search of posthumous praise. In R.E. Riggio, I. Chaleff, & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art of followership: How great followers create leaders and organizations (pp. 181-194). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., Peterson, S.J., & Ibrayeva, E. (1998). The potential for the “dark side” of leadership in post-communist countries. Journal of World Business, 33, 185-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S.B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: Role stress and individual differences. Violence and Victims, 22, 735-753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, P. (1996). When the mask slips: Inappropriate coercion in organisations undergoing restructuring. In P. McCarthy, M. Sheehan, & D. Wilkie (Eds.), Bullying: From backyard to boardroom. Alexandria, VA: Millenium Books, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C.: 1975, Power: The Inner Experience (New York, Irvington)

  • Meindl, J.R. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 329-341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J.R., & Ehrlich, S.B. (1987). The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 91-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J.R., Ehrlich, S.B., & Dukerich, J.M. (1985). The Romance of Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P., Rehg, M., Near, J.P., & Ryan, K.C. (1999). Can laws protect whistle- blowers? Results of a naturally occurring field experiment. Work and Occupations, 26, 129-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M.D., Espejo, J., Hunter, S.T., Bedell-Avers, K.E., Eubanks, D.L., & Connelly, S. (2007). The sources of leader violence: A comparison of ideological and non-ideological leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 217-235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., T. E. Gessner, M. S. Connelly, J. A. O’Connor and T. C. Clifton: 1993, ‘Leadership and Destructive Acts: Individual and Situational Influences’, The Leadership Quarterly, 4, 115-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.R., Herr, B.M., Lockhart, M.C., & Maguire, E. (1986). Evaluating the performance of paper people. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 654-661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Mumford, Clifton, Gessner, & Connelly (1995). Charismatic Leaders and Destructiveness: An histriometric study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 529-555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C.A., & Chatman, J.A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In B.M. Staw, & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 157-200). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R.B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C.L., & Sims, H.P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamcs: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M. and W. D. Todor: 1985, `Relationships Between Leader Reward and Punishment Behavior and Group Processes and Productivity', Journal of Management 11, 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., M. L. Barman, W. D. Todor and R. A. Grover: 1982, `Relationships Between Leader Reward and Punishment Behaviors, Role Ambiguity and Hospital Pharmacists' Satisfaction', in K. H. Chung (ed.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, pp. 42–46

  • Ridgeway, C.L. (2001). Gender, Status, and Leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C.L. & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as Status. In A.H. Eagly, A.E. Beall & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Psychology of Gender (pp. 217-241). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.L., & O’Leary-Kelly (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S.A., & Pittinsky, T.L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617-633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G.R., & Baldwin, N.J. (2006). Ethical climate theory, whistle-blowing, and the code of silence in police agencies in the State of Georgia. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 341-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G.R., & Baldwin, N.J. (2007). Whistle-blowing and the code of silence in police agencies: Policy and structural predictors. Crime & Deliquency, 53, 605-632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G.R. & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56, 1213-1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28, 447– 479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1983). Work climates: An interactionist perspective. In N. W. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 106 – 128). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19 –39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, M. (1996). Case studies in organisational restructuring. In P. McCarthy, M. Sheehan, & D. Wilkie (Eds.), Bullying: From backyard to boardroom. Alexandria, VA: Millenium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P.E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fleet, D.D. & Griffin, R.W. (2006). Dysfunctional organization culture; The role of leadership in motivating dysfunctional work behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L.S. (1974). Assumptions about human nature: A social-psychological analysis. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 506 Keller Building, University Park, PA, 16802, U.S.A.

    Christian N. Thoroughgood & Katina B. Sawyer

  2. Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 506E Keller Building, University Park, PA, 16802, U.S.A.

    Samuel T. Hunter

Authors
  1. Christian N. Thoroughgood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samuel T. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katina B. Sawyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian N. Thoroughgood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thoroughgood, C.N., Hunter, S.T. & Sawyer, K.B. Bad Apples, Bad Barrels, and Broken Followers? An Empirical Examination of Contextual Influences on Follower Perceptions and Reactions to Aversive Leadership. J Bus Ethics 100, 647–672 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0702-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0702-z

Key words

Search

Navigation