Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T08:06:47.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical Ethics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Linares Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

David C. Thomasma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When the Linares case broke in Chicago, the media immediately began contacting ethicists and hospital lawyers in the area. Eventually, and somewhat wistfully as one paper reported, they were unable to find a single ethicist who did not think that the decision should have been made to withdraw treatment from Samuel far earlier in his treatment. Furthermore, ethicists argued that the family and physician should have made that decision. There was no need to consult with lawyers and especially not with courts.

On the other hand, most lawyers contacted felt it was necessary to go to court to obtain permission to withdraw the respirator, since the legal status of such decisions in Illinois (as in most other states) was terribly unclear. Lack of “clarity” was a catchword in these interviews.

This dichotomy between the instinctive reactions of ethicists and lawyers is natural. It should be so. The ethicists consulted, philosophers, theologians, and physicians, are all skilled in clinical ethics.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , Winter 1989 , pp. 335 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flaherty, Roger and Lehmann, Daniel J., “Ending Life Support for Hopeless Cases Called Morally Right,” Chicago Sun-Times, Thursday, April 27, 1989, 5. In this article, William May and Joseph Cardinal Bernadin are cited as arguing that withdrawal of care is not active euthanasia, but removing burdensome treatment.Google Scholar
Cranford, Ronald, Letter in Medical News.Google Scholar
Phillips, Donald, “Care of the Dying: The Linares Case,” Hospital Ethics 5, no. 4 (July/month, 1989), 11.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Dan and Flaherty, Roger, “Linares Case Puts Heat on Assembly,” Chicago Sun-Times, May 1 , 1989, 5, 49.Google Scholar
Phillips, Donald, “The Care of the Dying: The Linares Case,” Hospital Ethics 5, no. 4 (July/August, 1989),11.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, 3rd edition), pp. 67–306.Google Scholar
See: Graber, G. and Thomasma, D.C., Theory and Practice in Medical Ethics (New York: Continuum, 1989), pp. 173–208.Google Scholar
Howard Wolinsky, “Doctor's Story: Linares Baby Defied Odds, He Says; Don't Punish Dad,” Chicago Sun-Times, April 28, 1989,1,4.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kevin and Wright, Hugh, “Father Disconnects Life Support, Son Dies,” USA Today, Thursday, April 27 , 1989, 3A.Google Scholar
Phillips, loc. cit.Google Scholar
Phillips, loc. cit.Google Scholar
As noted by Phillips, loc. cit.Google Scholar
Raffin, Thomas Shurkin, Joel and Sinkler, Wharton III, Intensive Care: Facing the Critical Choices (New York: W.H. Freeman and Co., 1989), pp. 105–172.Google Scholar
The Hastings Center, Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying (Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.: The Hastings Center, 1987); Douglas Walton, Ethics of Withdrawal of Life-Support Systems (Westport, CN.: Greenwood Press, 1983), pp. 68–106, 203–216.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D.C., For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 148–171.Google Scholar
In re Conroy, 190 NJ Super 453, 464 A2d 303 (NJ App 1983) appeal docketed, No. 21, 642 (NJ Sup Ct); 98 N.J. 321, 486 A2d 1209 (1985).Google Scholar
Cruzan v. Director of Missouri Department of Health, U.S. Supreme Court.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. Cohen, E. and Thomasma, D.C., “Making Treatment Decisions for Permanently Unconscious Patients,” in Monagle, J. and Thomasma, D.C. (Eds.), Medical Ethics: A Guide for Health Professionals (Rockville, MD.: Aspen, 1988), pp. 186–204.Google Scholar
Legislative recommendations like this are being considered by the Cook County State's Attorney's Task Force on Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment that was established after the Linares case by the newly appointed State's Attorney, Cecil Partee. The examples I have included here are entirely my own, and are not intended to reflect the thinking of that committee even though I am appointed to the committee and to the subcommittee drafting such legislative proposals.Google Scholar