Abstract
Bryan Norton’s 2005 book Sustainability describes a pragmatic approach to environmental philosophy that stresses philosophy’s role as one of mediating between scientific and ordinary language. But on two topics, Norton’s approach is not pragmatic enough. In the case of his discussion of risk, he accedes to a scientific notion that fails to acknowledge the way that ordinary usage of the word risk involves pragmatic links to human action and moral responsibility. With respect to the word sustainability, his analysis fails to acknowledge important scientific work that characterizes the functional integrity of system cycling, opting instead for usage grounded either in economic accounting or in an even less substantive sense of a broad social movement for environmental improvement. On each of these topics, adherence to the pragmatic orientation of Norton’s philosophy results in a different analysis of the concepts in question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen P. Sachs C. (1992) The Poverty of Sustainability: An Analysis of Current Positions. Agriculture and Human Values 94:29–35
Bawden R. (2004) Angst, Agoras, and Academe: Reflections on an Experience in Conscious Evolution. World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution 60:53–66
Douglass G. K. (1984) Agricultural Sustainability in a Changing World. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
Norton B. (2005) Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
NRC (National Research Council) (1986) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
NRC (National Research Council) (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Slovic P. (1999) Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis 19:689–701
Thompson P. B. (1991) Risk: Ethical Issues and Values. In: J. F. MacDonald (ed.), Agricultural Biotechnology, Food Safety and Nutritional Quality for the Consumer, National Agricultural Biotechnology Council (NABC) Report 2. NABC, Ithaca NY, pp 204–217
Thompson P. B. (1995) The Spirit of the Soil: Agriculture and Environmental Ethics. Routledge Publishing Co, New York and London
Thompson P. B. (1997) Sustainability as a Norm. Techné: Technology in Culture and Concept 2(2):75–94
Thompson P. B. (1998) Agricultural Ethics: Research, Teaching and Public Policy. Iowa State University Press, Ames IA
Thompson P. B. (1999) The Ethics of Truth-Telling and the Problem of Risk. Science and Engineering Ethics 5(4):489–511
Thompson P. B. (2003) Value Judgments and Risk Comparisons: The Case of Genetically Engineered Crops. Plant Physiology 132:10–16
Thompson P. B., Dean W. E. (1996) Competing Conceptions of Risk. Risk: Health, Safety and Environment 7(4):361–384
Thompson P. B., Nardone A. (1999), Sustainable Livestock Production: Methodological and Ethical Challenges. Livestock Production Science 61:111–119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, P.B. Norton’s Sustainability: Some Comments on Risk and Sustainability. J Agric Environ Ethics 20, 375–386 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9041-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9041-1