Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:23:20.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are we all implicit puritans? New evidence that work and sex are intuitively moralized in both traditional and non-traditional cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Warren Tierney
Affiliation:
Organisational Behaviour Area/Marketing Area, INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore warren.tierney@insead.edu wilson-cyrus.lai@insead.edu eric.luis.uhlmann@gmail.com
Wilson Cyrus-Lai
Affiliation:
Organisational Behaviour Area/Marketing Area, INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore warren.tierney@insead.edu wilson-cyrus.lai@insead.edu eric.luis.uhlmann@gmail.com
Eric Luis Uhlmann
Affiliation:
Organisational Behaviour Area/Marketing Area, INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore warren.tierney@insead.edu wilson-cyrus.lai@insead.edu eric.luis.uhlmann@gmail.com

Abstract

Contradicting our earlier claims of American moral exceptionalism, recent self-replication evidence from our laboratory indicates that implicit puritanism characterizes the judgments of people across cultures. Implicit cultural evolution may lag behind explicit change, such that differences between traditional and non-traditional cultures are greater at a deliberative than an intuitive level. Not too deep down, perhaps we are all implicit puritans.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, W. (2005). America's crisis of values. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition, Vol. 10. The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 161). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Celniker, J. B., Gregory, A., Koo, H. J., Piff, P. K., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. F. (2023). The moralization of effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 6079. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, T. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2022). Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotypes III: Long-term change in gender stereotypes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, T. E., Yang, V., Mann, T. C., Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2021). Gender stereotypes in natural language: Word embeddings show robust consistency across child and adult language corpora of more than 65 million words. Psychological Science, 32(2), 218240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Tocqueville, A. (1840/1990). Democracy in America. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., & Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 328339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Chapter 2: Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55130). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(61–83), 111135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landes, D. S. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. Norton.Google Scholar
Landy, J. F., Jia, M., Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., Dreber, A., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 451479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipset, S. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double edged sword. Norton.Google Scholar
Nelson, L., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology's renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 511534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poehlman, T. A. (2007). Ideological inheritance: Implicit puritanism in American moral cognition. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 13591366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H. III, Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E., … Uhlmann, E. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H. III, Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L. (2012). American psychological isolationism. Review of General Psychology, 16, 381390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Implicit theism. In Sorrentino, R. & Yamaguchi, S. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 7194). Elsevier/Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). American moral exceptionalism. In Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 2752). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Implicit puritanism in American moral cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 312320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar