On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i3.7501Keywords:
informal logic, intuition, kisceral argumentation, multi-modal argumentation, mysticismAbstract
Of the different modes that characterize Michael Gilbert’s multi-modal theory of argumentation, the kisceral is in many ways the most challenging to understand and employ. It appears to bypass the processes of reason that have dominated accounts in the Western tradition, diverting us toward the private worlds of hunches and gut reactions. This paper explores the nature of kisceral arguments, comparing them to the way intuition operates in William James’ examination of mystical experience. Having provided an account of kisceral arguments and their operation, the discussion turns to the even more challenging issue of how such arguments should be evaluated.
References
Albert, Elisa and Jennifer Block. 2020. Who’s afraid of Gwyneth Paltrow and Goop? The New York Times. URL: <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/03/opinion/goop-gwyneth-paltrow-netflix.html?auth=link-dismiss-google1tap>.
Bataille, George. 2014. Inner experience. Trans. S. Kendall. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Brockriede, Wayne. 2006. What is argument. In Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede. Eds. Robert Trapp and Janice Schuetz. New York: International Debate Educa-tion Association.
Foot, Philippa. 1967. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review 5: 1-5.
Gilbert, Michael A. 1994. Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 24(2): 159-77.
Gilbert, Michael A. .1997. Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilbert, Michael A. .2011. The kisceral: Reason and intuition in argumentation. Argumentation 25: 163-170.
Gilbert, Michael A. .2015. Arguing with people. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
Groarke, Leo and Christopher W. Tindale. 2013. Good reasoning matters: A constructive approach to critical thinking. 5th edition. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.
James, William. 1897/1956. The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
James, William. 1902. The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature; Gifford lectures delivered at Edinburg in 1901-1902. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.
Johnson, Ralph H. and J. Anthony Blair. 1993. Logical self-defense. 3rd edition. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Luria, Alexander F. 1976. Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Trans. M. Lopez-Morillas and L. Solotaroff. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Perelman, Chaïm. 1982. The realm of rhetoric. Trans. William Kluback. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Perelman, Chaïm and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rheto-ric: A treatise on argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Pur-cell Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Plato. 1966 Plato in twelve volumes, vol. 1. Trans. Harold North Fowler.. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, Wil-liam Heinemann Ltd.
Plato. 2012. Crito. Trans. Cathal Woods and Ryan Pack. URL: <https://www.pitt.edu/~mthompso/readings/crito.pdf>
Rawls, John. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA. Belknap Press.
Thagard, Paul. 2006. Hot thought: Mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1985. The trolley problem. Yale Law Re-view94(6): 1395-1415.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2020. Argumentation schemes and audienc-es: What rhetoric can bring to scheme theory. In Rigour and rea-son: Essays in honour of Hans Vilhelm Hansen, eds. J.A. Blair and C.W. Tindale. WSIA: 252-76.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2021. The anthropology of argument: Cul-tural foundations of rhetoric and reason. New York: Routledge.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argu-mentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Trans. D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Zaehner, Richard C. 1957. Mysticism sacred and profane: An inquiry into some varieties of praeternatural experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
