Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to Use Historical Approach to Teach Nature of Science in Chemistry Education?

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful implementation of historical approach to teach nature of science (NOS) requires suitable curriculum material. Several research and development projects have produced lesson plans for science teachers. 25 lesson plans from four different projects involved in creating curriculum material utilizing historical approach in chemistry education were analyzed to describe NOS content included as well as the historical experiments and narratives used. Based on the results of descriptive content analysis of existing curriculum materials, several suggestions on the successful design of lesson plans utilizing historical approach are made. To increase the coherence and clarity of learning objectives and instruction, each lesson plan should focus on the limited amount of specific NOS issues instead of several overtly general NOS aspects. To support explicit classroom discussion on the selected NOS issues, historical narratives used in the lesson plans should illustrate these issues. The lesson plans should also include instructions on how to facilitate classroom discussion, such as questions for students to discuss and reflect. Recommendations are also made concerning the appropriate use of historical experiments and narrative elements such as viewpoint characters and conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Similar structure was also suggested by Rudge and Howe (2009), who used research on sickle cell anemia as a context for eight lessons, each lesson discussing different case in the history of said research.

  2. Ducheyne (2012) describes a case study where the Cavendish experiment is discussed with students without conducting the experiment. Niaz (2010) uses descriptions of historical experiments when teaching with controversies.

  3. http://www1.umn.edu/ships/.

  4. http://hipstwiki.wetpaint.com/.

  5. http://www.storybehindthescience.org/.

  6. http://www.luma.fi/materiaalit (in Finnish).

  7. In Finnish school system chemistry is taught as a separate subject. Because of this, there is need for curriculum material that is intended especially for chemistry education.

  8. Affective learning objectives (e.g. increasing students' interest in science) were outside of the scope of this study and were not analyzed.

  9. See http://www1.umn.edu/ships/initiate.htm for MCSC and http://www.storybehindthescience.org/support.html for SBS. HIPST offered a link to MCSC guidelines. Review of FTC project is outside the scope of this study.

  10. Comprehensive narrative is similar to the idea of history as unifying context in case study, suggested by Stinner et al. (2003). Also approaches used in MCSC and HIPST are described as case studies (Allchin 2011b; Höttecke and Riess 2009) and aim at comprehensive use of narratives.

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2.

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Ledermann, N. G. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 1057–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Ledermann, N. G. (2000b). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (1999). History of science-with labs. Science & Education, 8(6), 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011a). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011b). The Minnesota case study collection: New historical inquiry case studies for nature of science education. Science & Education, 21(9), 1263–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2011). How historical experiments can improve scientific knowledge and science education: The cases of boiling water and electrochemistry. Science & Education, 20(3–4), 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2007). Teaching the nature of science to secondary and post-secondary students: Questions rather than tenets. The Pantaneto Forum, 25. Retrieved from http://www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue25/front25.htm.

  • Clough, M. P. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mello Forato, T. C., de Andrade Martins, R., & Pietrocola, M. (2012). History and nature of science in high school: Building up parameters to guide educational materials and strategies. Science & Education, 21(5), 657–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducheyne, S. (2012). The cavendish experiment as a tool for historical understanding of science. Science & Education, 21(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garritz, A. (2013). Teaching the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry through controversies. Science & Education, 22(7), 1787–1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henke, A., Höttecke, D., & Riess, F. (2009). Case studies for teaching and learning with history and philosophy of science. Paper presented at the tenth international history, philosophy, and science teaching conference, South Bend, USA 2009, June 24–28, 2009. http://www3.nd.edu/~ihpst09/papers/Henke_MS.pdf. Accessed 24 April, 2013.

  • Hildebrand, G. (2007). Diversity, values and the science curriculum. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 45–60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teacher’s guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science (pp. 149–172). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D. (2000). How and what can we learn from replicating historical experiments? A case study. Science & Education, 9(4), 342–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2012). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: Strategies, methods, results and experiences from the European HIPST project. Science & Education, 21(9), 1233–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höttecke, D. & Riess, F. (2009). Developing and implementing case studies for teaching science with the help of history and philosophy, Paper presented at the tenth international history, philosophy, and science teaching conference, South Bend, USA 2009, June 24–28, 2009. http://www3.nd.edu/~ihpst09/papers/Hoettecke_Paper_IHPST09.pdf. Accessed 24 April, 2013.

  • Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: An analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20(3–4), 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, S. (2009). The construction and analysis of a science story: A proposed methodology. Science & Education, 18(3–4), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubli, F. (2001). Can the theory of narratives help science teachers be better storytellers? Science & Education, 10(6), 595–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Byoung, S. K., & Eun, K. K. (2012). Teaching and learning of nature of science and scientific inquiry: Building capacity through systematic research-based professional development. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 125–152). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-S., & Chen, C.-C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-Y., Cheng, J.-H., & Chang, W.-H. (2010). Making science vivid: Using a historical episodes map. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2521–2531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, D. & Stinner, A. (2006). A role for historical experiments: Capturing the spirit of the itinerant lecturers of the 18th century. Science & Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9016-z.

  • Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2009). Progressive transitions in chemistry teachers’ understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies. Science & Education, 18(1), 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2010). Science curriculum and teacher education: The role of presuppositions, contradictions, controversies and speculations vs. Kuhn’s ‘normal science’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 891–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2001). Do we have to introduce history and philosophy of science or is it already ‘inside’chemistry? Chemical Education Research and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18(5), 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinner, A., McMillan, B. A., Metz, D., Jilek, J. M., & Klassen, S. (2003). The renewal of case studies in science education. Science & Education, 12(7), 617–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, V.-M., & Aksela, M. (2009). A novel course of chemistry as a scientific discipline: How do prospective teachers perceive nature of chemistry through visits to research groups? Chemical Education Research and Practice, 10(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, V.-M. & Aksela, M. (2013). Design of chemistry teacher education course on nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2193–2225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, V.-M., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2013). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1839–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, V.-M., Manassero-Mas, M. A. & Vázques-Alonso, Á. (in press). History and philosophy of science and science, technology and society traditions in science education: Their continuities and discontinuities. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

  • Wandersee, J. H. (1990). On the value and use of the history of science in teaching today’s science: Constructing historical vignettes. In D. E. Herget (Ed.), More history and philosophy of science in science teaching (pp. 278–283). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H., & Baudoin Griffard, P. (2002). The history of chemistry: Potential and actual contributions to chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 29–46). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simo Tolvanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tolvanen, S., Jansson, J., Vesterinen, VM. et al. How to Use Historical Approach to Teach Nature of Science in Chemistry Education?. Sci & Educ 23, 1605–1636 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9646-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9646-x

Keywords

Navigation