Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution

  • Published:
Brain and Mind

Abstract

The neural basis of binocular rivalry has beenthe subject of vigorous debate. Do discrepantmonocular patterns rival for awareness becauseof neural competition among patternrepresentations or monocular channels? In thisarticle, I briefly review psychophysical andneurophysiological evidence pertaining to boththeories and discuss important new neuroimagingdata which reveal that rivalry is fullyresolved in monocular visual cortex. These newfindings strongly suggest that interocularcompetition mediates binocular rivalry and thatV1 plays an important role in the selection ofconscious visual information. They furthersuggest that rivalry is not a unitaryphenomenon. Interocular competition may fullyaccount for binocular rivalry whereas aseparate mechanism involving patterncompetition likely accounts for monocular andstimulus rivalry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, T.J. andPurves, D., 1997: Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(18), 9905-9908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.,Campbell, F.W.,Fiorentini, A. andMaffei, L., 1973: The dependence of monocular rivalry on spatial frequency. Perception 2(2), 127-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzopardi, P. andCowey, A., 1997: Is blindsight like normal, near-threshold vision? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(25), 14190-14194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbur, J.L.,Watson, J.D.,Frackowiak, R.S. andZeki, S., 1993: Conscious visual perception without V1. Brain 116(Pt 6), 1293-1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., 1989: A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 96(1), 145-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. andBoothroyd, K., 1985: The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry. Perception and Psychophysics 37(2), 114-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. andFox, R.: 1974, Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature 249(456), 488-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R.,O'shea, R.P. andMueller, T.J., 1992: Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Vis Neurosci 8(5), 469-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. andOverton, R., 1979, The site of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception 8(2), 143-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R.,Westendorf, D.H. andOverton, R., 1980: What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception 9(2), 223-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsellino, A.A.,De Marco, A. andAllazetta, A., 1972: Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 10, 139-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, G.M.,Demb, J.B.,Glover, G.H. andHeeger, D.J., 1999: Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination. Vision Res 39(2), 257-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese, B.B., 1899: On inhibition. Psychological Monographs 3(1), 1-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.J. andNorcia, A.M., 1997: A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP. Vision Res 37(17), 2401-2408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, W.A.,Morton, H.B. andEttlinger, G., 1967: Cerebral potential evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry. Nature 216, 1123-1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. andKoch, C., 1995: Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature 375(6527), 121-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayan, P., 1998: A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Comput 10(5), 1119-1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Caneja, E., 1928: Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Annales d'Oculistique 165, 721-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuTour, E.-F., 1760: Discussion d'une question d'optique, l'Académie des Sciences. Mémoire de mathémathique et de physique présentés par Divers Savants 3, 514-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S.A.,Rumelhart, D.E.,Wandell, B. A.,Lee, A.T.,Glover, G.H.,Chichilnisky, E.J. andShadlen, M.N., 1994: fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature 369(6481), 525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahle, M., 1987: Naso-temporal asymmetry of binocular inhibition. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28(6), 1016-1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. andCheck, R., 1972: Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. J Exp Psychol 93(2), 283-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. andHerrmann, J., 1967: Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception and Psychophysics 2, 432-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halgren, E.,Dale, A.M.,Sereno, M.I.,Tootell, R.B.,Marinkovic, K. andRosen, B.R., 1999: Location of human face-selective cortex with respect to retinotopic areas. Human Brain Mapping 7(1), 29-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D.L.,Patterson, R. andBlake, R., 1987: Are stereoacuity and binocular rivalry related? Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64(1), 41-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeger, D.J.,Huk, A.C.,Geisler, W.S. andAlbrecht, D.G., 2000: Spikes versus BOLD: what does neuroimaging tell us about neuronal activity? Nat Neurosci 3(7), 631-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. v., 1924: Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics (J.P.C. Southall, Trans.), Rochester, New York: The Optical Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hering, E., 1977: The Theory of Binocular Vision (B. Bridgeman, Trans.), New York: Plenum (original work published 1868).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J.C.,Dagi, L.R.,McCrane, E.P. andde Monasterio, F.M., 1990: Arrangement of ocular dominance columns in human visual cortex. Arch Ophthalmol 108(7), 1025-1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H. andWiesel, T.N., 1962: Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160, 106-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H. andWiesel, T.N., 1968: Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 195(1), 215-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, I.,Papathomas, T.V.,Yang, M. andFeher, A., 1996: When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(26), 15508-15511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwong, K.K.,Belliveau, J.W.,Chesler, D.A.,Goldberg, I.E.,Weisskoff, R.M.,Poncelet, B.P.,Kennedy, D.N.,Hoppel, B.E.,Cohen, M.S. andTurner, R., 1992: Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(12), 5675-5679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, L.C., 1970: Effects of knowledge of results and spacing of practice trials in training of control of binocular rivalry. Percept Mot Skills 31(3), 827-830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, L.C., 1978: Selective Attention and the Control of Binocular Rivalry, The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, R.W., 1964: Electroencephalographic correlates of binocular rivalry in man. Science 146, 1325-1327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.H. andBlake, R., 1999: Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res 39(8), 1447-1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehky, S.R., 1988: An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception 17(2), 215-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehky, S.R. andBlake, R., 1991: Organization of binocular pathways: Modeling and data related to rivalry. Neural Computation 3(1), 44-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhle, S.W. andFox, R., 1975: Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect. Vision Res 15(7), 855-859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D.A., 1997: Brain Mechanisms of Visual Awareness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D.A. andLogothetis, N.K., 1996: Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379(6565), 549-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D.A. andLogothetis, N.K., 1999: Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(7), 254-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVay, S.,Connolly, M.,Houde, J. andVan Essen, D.C., 1985: The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 5(2), 486-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M., 1965: On Binocular Rivalry, Assen, The Netherlands: Royal VanGorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. andGao, J., 2000: An investigation of the impulse functions for the nonlinear BOLD response in functional MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 18(8), 931-938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L.,Tyler, C.W. andSchor, C.M., 1992: Failure of rivalry at low contrast: Evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process. Vision Res 32(8), 1471-1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logothetis, N.K., 1998: Single units and conscious vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353(1377), 1801-1818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logothetis, N.K.,Leopold, D.A. andSheinberg, D.L., 1996: What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380(6575), 621-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logothetis, N.K. andSchall, J.D., 1989: Neural correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245, 761-763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumer, E.D.,Friston, K.J. andRees, G., 1998: Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280(5371), 1930-1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makous, W. andSanders, R.K., 1978: Suppressive interactions between fused patterns. In J.C. Armington,J. Krauskopf andB.R. Wooten (eds), Visual Psychophysics and Physiology, New York: Academic Press, pp. 167-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, K., 1984: The dynamic model of binocular rivalry. Biol Cybern 49(3), 201-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R.S. andGoodyear, B.G., 1999: Submillimeter functional localization in human striate cortex using BOLD contrast at 4 Tesla: implications for the vascular point-spread function. Magn Reson Med 41(2), 230-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R.S.,Luknowsky, D.C. andGati, J.S., 1998: Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(18), 10902-10907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R.S.,Ogawa, S.,Strupp, J.P. andUgurbil, K., 1997: Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurophysiol 77(5), 2780-2787.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'shea, R.P., 1999: Translation of Dutour (1760) [On-line]. Available: http://psy.otago.ac.nz:800/ r_oshea/dutour60.html.

  • O'shea, R.P. and Crassini, B., 1981: Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry. Vision Res 21(6), 801-804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, S.,Tank, D.W.,Menon, R.,Ellermann, J.M.,Kim, S.G.,Merkle, H. andUgurbil, K., 1992: Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(13), 5951-5955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, A.,Blake, R.,Braun, J. andHeeger, D.J., 2000: Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 3(11), 1153-1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G.,Friston, K. andKoch, C., 2000: A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nat Neurosci 3(7), 716-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, H.R.,Gross, C.G. andAlbright, T.D., 1989: Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. I. Effects of striate cortex removal. J Neurosci 9(6), 2033-2050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengpiel, F.,Baddeley, R.J.,Freeman, T.C.,Harrad, R. andBlakemore, C., 1998: Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17. Vision Res 38(14), 2067-2080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sereno, M.I.,Dale, A.M.,Reppas, J.B.,Kwong, K.K.,Belliveau, J.W.,Brady, T.J.,Rosen, B.R. andTootell, R. B., 1995: Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268(5212), 889-893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheinberg, D.L. andLogothetis, N.K., 1997: The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(7), 3408-3413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoerig, P. andCowey, A., 1997: Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain 120(Pt 3), 535-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoerig, P.,Kleinschmidt, A. andFrahm, J., 1998: No visual responses in denervated V1: Highresolution functional magnetic resonance imaging of a blindsight patient. Neuroreport 9(1), 21-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugie, N., 1982: Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry in binocular vision. Biol Cybern 43(1), 13-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, F. andEngel, S.A., 2001: Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411, 195-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, F.,Nakayama, K.,Vaughan, J.T. andKanwisher, N., 1998: Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21(4), 753-759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tononi, G.,Srinivasan, R.,Russell, D.P. andEdelman, G.M., 1998: Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(6), 3198-3203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tootell, R.B.H.,Hadjikhani, N.K.,Vanduffel, W.,Liu, A.K.,Mendola, J.D.,Sereno, M.I. andDale, A.M., 1998: Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 811-817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N.J., 1975: Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours. Perception 4(1), 85-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N.J. andWenderoth, P., 1978: The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect. Vision Res 18(7), 827-835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wales, R. andFox, R., 1970: Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics 8(2), 90-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, G.L., 1954: The filling in process. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 31, 329-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatstone, C., 1838: Contributions to the physiology of vision-Part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128, 371-394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Green Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544

    Frank Tong

Authors
  1. Frank Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tong, F. Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution. Brain and Mind 2, 55–83 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017942718744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017942718744

Search

Navigation