Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Temporal reference in Paraguayan Guaraní, a tenseless language

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contributes data from Paraguayan Guaraní (Tupí-Guaraní) to the discussion of how temporal reference is determined in tenseless languages. The empirical focus of this study is on finite clauses headed by verbs inflected only for person/number information, which are compatible only with non-future temporal reference in most matrix clause contexts. The paper first explores the possibility of accounting for the temporal reference of such clauses with a phonologically empty non-future tense morpheme, along the lines of Matthewson’s (Linguist Philos 29:673–713, 2006) analysis of a similar phenomenon in St’át’imcets (Salish). This analysis is then contrasted with one according to which temporal reference is not constrained by tense in Paraguayan Guaraní, but only by context and temporal adverbials. A comparison of the two analyses, both of which are couched in a dynamic semantic framework, suggests empirical and theoretical advantages of the tenseless analysis over the tensed one. The paper concludes with a discussion of cross-linguistic variation of temporal reference in tensed and tenseless languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abusch D. (1997) Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(1): 1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abusch D. (1998) Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. In: Rothstein S. (eds) Events and grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 13–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aloni, M. (2000). Quantification under conceptual covers. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

  • Bar-el, L. (2005). Aspectual distinctions in Skwxwú7mesh. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia.

  • Bar-el, L., Davis, H., & Matthewson, L. (2005). On non-culminating accomplishments. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (Vol. 35). University of assachusetts, Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Beaver D. (2001) Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner M. (2005) Future discourse in a tenseless language. Journal of Semantics 22: 339–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner M. (2008) Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora. In: Rothstein S. (eds) Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M. (to appear). Tense, mood, and centering. In R. Musan & M. Rathert (Eds.), Tense across languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Bohnemeyer J. (2002) The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Lincom, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnemeyer J. (2009) Temporal anaphora in a tenseless language. In: Klein W., Li P. (eds) The expression of time in language. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 83–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee J. L., Pagliuca W. (1987) The evolution of future meaning. In: Ramat A.G., Carruba O., Bernini G. (eds) Papers from the VIIth international conference on historical linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung S., Timberlake A. (1985) Tense, aspect and mood. In: Shoepen T. (eds) Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 202–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1985) Tense. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1989) On identifying future tense. In: Abraham W., Janssen T. (eds) Tempus, Aspekt, Modus: die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen, Niemeyer, pp 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Condoravdi C. (2002) Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In: Beaver D., Martínez L.C., Clark B., Kaufmann S. (eds) The construction of meaning. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 59–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Copley, B. L. (2002). The semantics of the future. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

  • Dahl Ö. (1985) Tense and aspect systems. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. (1993). Transsentential meditations. Ups and downs in dynamic semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Deo A. (2009) Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics & Philosophy 32: 475–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty D. (1979) Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty D. (1986) The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics?. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 37–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç M. (1996) Tense and modality. In: Lappin S. (eds) The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Blackwell, London, pp 345–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennari S. (2003) Tense meaning and temporal interpretation. Journal of Semantics 20: 35–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregores E., Suárez J.A. (1967) A description of colloquial Guaraní. Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk J. (2007). The logic of interrogation. In Aloni M., Butler A., Dekker P. (eds) Questions in dynamic semantics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 43-62

  • Hamblin C. (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Hinrichs E. (1986) Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Jóhannsdóttir, K. M., & Matthewson, L. (2007). Zero-marked tense: The case of Gitxsan. In Proceedings of NELS (Vol. 37). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

  • Kamp H., Reyle U. (1993) From discourse to logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann S. (2005) Conditional truth and future reference. Journal of Semantics 22(3): 231–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (2005). The Vedic injunctive: Historical and synchronic implications. In R. Singh & T. Bhattacharya (Eds.), The yearbook of south Asian languages and linguistics (pp. 219–235). Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Kissine M. (2008) Why will is not a modal. Natural Language Semantics 16: 129–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein W. (1994) Time in language. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In D. Strolovitch & A. Lawson (Eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) (Vol. VIII, pp. 92–110). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Krivoshein de Canese, N., Gamba, C. M., & Alcaraz, F. A. (Eds.). (2005). Tetãgua Remimombéu: Cuentos Populares Paraguayos. Asunción, Paraguay: Servilibro.

  • Lakoff, G. (1971). Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics (pp. 329–340). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lee J., Tonhauser J. (2010) Temporal interpretation without tense: Coordination constructions in Korean and Japanese. Journal of Semantics 27: 307–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J.-W. (2003) Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12: 259–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J.-W. (2005) Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23: 1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, L. (2002). Tense in St’át’imcets and in universal grammar. In C. Gillon, N. Sawai, & R. Wojdak (Eds.), Papers for the 37th international conference on Salish and neighbouring languages (Vol. 9). Vancouver: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Matthewson, L. (2004a). On the absence of telic accomplishments in St’át’imcets. In Proceedings of the workshop on structure and constituency in languages of the Americas (Vol. 4). UBC: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Matthewson L. (2004b) On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70(4): 369–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson L. (2006) Temporal semantics in a supposedly tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 673–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Educación y Cultura. (2004). La educación bilingüe en la reforma educativa Paraguaya. Accessed September 30, 2008, from http://www.escuelaviva-mec.edu.py/investigaciones/60.pdf

  • Nordlinger R., Sadler L. (2008). When is a temporal marker not a tense? Reply to Tonhauser (2007). Language, 84(2), 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogihara, T. (1994). Adverbs of quantification and Sequence-of-Tense phenomena. In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (Vol. IV, pp. 251–267). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

  • Ogihara T. (1996) Tense, attitude, and scope. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee B.H. (1984) Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portner P. (1998) The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74: 760–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach H. (1947) Elements of symbolic logic. UC Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, E., & Wiltschko, M. (2005). Anchoring events to utterances without tense. In J. Alderete, C. Han, & A. Kochetov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th west coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL) (pp. 343–351). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Roberts C. (2004) Context in dynamic interpretation. In: Horn L., Ward G. (eds) Handbook of contemporary pragmatic theory. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 197–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Exupéry, A. D. (1946). The little prince. Paris: Editions Gallimard.

  • Saint-Exupéry, A. D. (2005). Mitãmi (The little prince). Asunción, Paraguay: Espectrograf, Artes. Gráficas. Guaraní translation of Saint-Exupéry (1946) by De Las Nieves Domínguez and Enrique Chamorro.

  • Sarkar, A. (1998). The conflict between future tense and modality: The case of will in English (Vol. 5.2, pp. 91–117). University of Pennsylvania: Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Sohn S.-O. (1999) Tense and aspect in Korean. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonhauser, J. (2006). The temporal semantics of noun phrases: Evidence from Guaraní. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.

  • Tonhauser J. (2007) Nominal tense? The meaning of Guaraní nominal temporal markers. Language 83(4): 831–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonhauser, J. (2008). Defining cross-linguistic categories: The case of nominal tense. Reply to Nordlinger and Sadler (2008). Language, 84(2), 332–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonhauser, J. (2009). Counterfactuality and future time reference: The case of Paraguayan Guaranímo’ã. In A. Riester & T. Solstad (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (Vol., 13 pp. 527–541).

  • Tonhauser, J. (2010). Is Paraguayan Guaraní a tenseless language? In Proceedings of semantics of underrepresented languages of the Americas (SULA) (Vol. 2, pp. 227–242). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

  • Tonhauser, J. (to appear). The future marker –ta of Paraguayan Guaraní: Formal semantics and crosslinguistic comparison. In R. Musan & M. Rathert (Eds.), Tense across languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Velázquez-Castillo, M. (2004). Guaraní (Tupí-Guaraní). In G. E. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, & S. Skopeteas (Eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (Vol. 2, pp. 1421–1432). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Webber B.L. (1988) Tense as a discourse anaphor. Computational Linguistics 14: 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner T. (2006) Future and non-future modal sentences. Natural Language Semantics 14: 235–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Judith Tonhauser

Authors
  1. Judith Tonhauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Tonhauser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tonhauser, J. Temporal reference in Paraguayan Guaraní, a tenseless language. Linguist and Philos 34, 257–303 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9097-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9097-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation