Abstract
The paper justifies the concept of “thematic structure” or “order of knowledge” over the traditional “classification of sciences” due to the uncertainty of many classification criteria. The thematic structure of science has, of course, various levels and various dimensions. Arguments against any forms of separating the humanities from sciences in the traditional sense of the term are presented and discussed. Equally unacceptable are attempts at sharp separation of technical disciplines and humanities. The thematic structure of humanities is not created by some material aspects but rather through the interest — or problem-oriented aspects. In addition to the natural sciences and the humanities there exists an important sphere of sciences on artefacts or, using the term by H. Simon, the sciences of the artificial. For the contemporary research activities is typical what could be denoted as “interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary complex.” The paper traces a set of epistemological criteria for the justification of the relative independence of a scientific discipline.
Similar content being viewed by others
LITERATURE
Apostel, Leo et al.: 1972, Interdisciplinarity. Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris.
Bunge, Mario: 1974, ‘Technology as Applied Science’. In: F. Rapp, Contributions to the Philosophy of Technology. D. Reidel Publ., Dordrecht, Boston.
Holton, Gerald: 1974, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Kotarbinski, Tadeusz: 1955, Traktat o dobrej robocie. Zaklad im. Ossolinskich, Lódz.
Parsons, Talcott: 1937, The Structure of Social Action. McGraw-Hill Publ. Comp., London.
Posner, Ronald: 1988, ‘What is an Academic Discipline?’. In: R. Claussen, R. Dauber-Schaekat, Hrsg., Gedankenzeichen. Stauffenbergverlag. pp. 165–1983.
Reichenbach, Hans: 1954, Nomological Statements and Admissible Operations. North Holland, Amsterdam.
Simon, Herbert, A: 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Spinner, Helmut, F.: 1994, DieWissensordnung. Ein Leitkonzept für die dritte Grundordnung des Informationszeitalters. Leske, Budrich, Opladen.
Stegmüller, Wolfgang: 1969, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Tondl, Ladislav: 1992, Sociální hodnocení techniky (Technology Assessment). Ediční středisko Západočeské univerzity, Plzeň (in Czech).
Tondl, Ladislav: 1994, Veda, technika a společnost (Science, Technology and Society). Soudobá tendence a transformace vzájemných vazeb (Contemporary Trend and Transformation of Interlinks). Filosifia, Prague (in Czech).
Weber, Max: 1922, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen.
Weber, Max: 1925, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tondl, L. What is the Thematic Structure of Science?. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 29, 245–264 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008267223985
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008267223985