Skip to main content
Log in

What is the Thematic Structure of Science?

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper justifies the concept of “thematic structure” or “order of knowledge” over the traditional “classification of sciences” due to the uncertainty of many classification criteria. The thematic structure of science has, of course, various levels and various dimensions. Arguments against any forms of separating the humanities from sciences in the traditional sense of the term are presented and discussed. Equally unacceptable are attempts at sharp separation of technical disciplines and humanities. The thematic structure of humanities is not created by some material aspects but rather through the interest — or problem-oriented aspects. In addition to the natural sciences and the humanities there exists an important sphere of sciences on artefacts or, using the term by H. Simon, the sciences of the artificial. For the contemporary research activities is typical what could be denoted as “interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary complex.” The paper traces a set of epistemological criteria for the justification of the relative independence of a scientific discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

LITERATURE

  1. Apostel, Leo et al.: 1972, Interdisciplinarity. Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bunge, Mario: 1974, ‘Technology as Applied Science’. In: F. Rapp, Contributions to the Philosophy of Technology. D. Reidel Publ., Dordrecht, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holton, Gerald: 1974, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge University Press.

  4. Kotarbinski, Tadeusz: 1955, Traktat o dobrej robocie. Zaklad im. Ossolinskich, Lódz.

  5. Parsons, Talcott: 1937, The Structure of Social Action. McGraw-Hill Publ. Comp., London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Posner, Ronald: 1988, ‘What is an Academic Discipline?’. In: R. Claussen, R. Dauber-Schaekat, Hrsg., Gedankenzeichen. Stauffenbergverlag. pp. 165–1983.

  7. Reichenbach, Hans: 1954, Nomological Statements and Admissible Operations. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, Herbert, A: 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spinner, Helmut, F.: 1994, DieWissensordnung. Ein Leitkonzept für die dritte Grundordnung des Informationszeitalters. Leske, Budrich, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stegmüller, Wolfgang: 1969, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tondl, Ladislav: 1992, Sociální hodnocení techniky (Technology Assessment). Ediční středisko Západočeské univerzity, Plzeň (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tondl, Ladislav: 1994, Veda, technika a společnost (Science, Technology and Society). Soudobá tendence a transformace vzájemných vazeb (Contemporary Trend and Transformation of Interlinks). Filosifia, Prague (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weber, Max: 1922, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weber, Max: 1925, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tondl, L. What is the Thematic Structure of Science?. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 29, 245–264 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008267223985

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008267223985

Navigation