Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:02:39.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Haptic perception is a dynamic system of cutaneous, proprioceptive, and motor components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2007

David Travieso ,
M. Pilar Aivar  and
Antoni Gomila
David Travieso
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain. david.travieso@uam.eshttp://www.uam.es/david.traviesomariapilar.aivar@uam.eshttp://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/psicologia/maivar/toni.
M. Pilar Aivar
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain. david.travieso@uam.eshttp://www.uam.es/david.traviesomariapilar.aivar@uam.eshttp://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/psicologia/maivar/toni.
Antoni Gomila
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. gomila@uib.eshttp://www.uib.es/facultat/psicologia/professorat/agomila.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general shortcoming of the localist, decompositional, approach to neuroscientific explanation that the target article exemplifies, is that it is incomplete unless supplemented with an account of how the hypothesized subsystems integrate in the normal case. Besides, a number of studies that show that object recognition is proprioception dependent and that cutaneous information affects motor performance make the existence of the proposed subsystems doubtful.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 222 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amazeen, E. L. & Turvey, M. T. (1996) Weight perception and the haptic size–weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22:213–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Blanco, F. & Travieso, D. (2003) Haptic exploration and mental estimation of distances in a fictitious island: From mind's eye to mind's hand. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 97:298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. F., Refshauge, K. M., Todd, G. & Gandevia, S. C. (2005) Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. Journal of Neurophysiology 94:1699–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franz, V. H. (2001) Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1(5):457–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, V. H. (2003) Manual size estimation: A neuropsychological measure of perception? Experimental Brain Research 151:471–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franz, V. H., Fahle, M., Bulthoff, H. H. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2001) Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27:1124–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Gomila, A. & Calvo, F. J. (forthcoming) Dynamicism and psychology: An introduction. New Ideas in Psychology.Google Scholar
Goodale, M. A. & Milner, A. D. (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 15:20–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, L. A. & Lederman, S. J. (2006) Human Hand Function. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederman, S. J. & Klatzky, R. L. (1990) Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration. Cognitive Psychology 22(4):421–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moberg, E. (1983) The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia, and motor function of the hand. Brain 106:1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moberg, E. (1991) The unsolved problem: How to test the functional value of the hand sensibility. Journal of Hand Therapy 4:105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, C. C., Carello, C. & Turvey, M. T. (1996) Extero- and exproprio-perception by dynamic touch are different functions of the inertia tensor. Perception and Psychophysics 58:1191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, C. & Turvey, M. T. (1998) Eigenvectors of the inertia tensor and perceiving the orientations of limbs and objects. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 14:331–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paillard, J. (1999) Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Motor control, today and tomorrow, ed. Gantchev, G. N., Mori, S. & Massion, J., pp. 197–214. Academic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Travieso, D., Blanco, F. & Rosa, A. (2001) Functional disturbances of touch in late blind diabetic adults. In: Studies in perception and action VI, ed. Burton, G. A. & Schmidt, R. C., pp. 219–22. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Travieso, D. & Lederman, S. J. (under revision) Assessing tactual deficits in the hand function of late-blind diabetics. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.Google Scholar
Turvey, M. (1996) Dynamic touch. American Psychologist 51(11):1134–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westling, G. & Johansson, R. S. (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Experimental Brain Research 53:277–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed