Abstract
In this article, I attempt to set out and discuss the main trajectories of Umberto Eco’s thinking on the media and mass communication, based on a review of the author’s writings on these subjects. What emerges from the study is Eco’s attention to the public and to forms of reception; his attention to the relationship between media communication and reality, which involves investigating the concept of “truth” in an area such as that of mass communication; his cross-media view of information, seen from a pluralistic and polyphonic viewpoint; the ethical tension that is always present in Eco’s work; his unfailing propensity for teaching. What emerges above all is the way in which the theoretical and practical tools used by Eco were developed in the context of reflections on the media and mass communication: an indication that alongside its “philosophical vocation,” Eco’s semiotics was always characterized also by an essential “empirical vocation.”
References
Bankov, Kristian. 2017. Eco and the google search innovations. In Torkild Thellefsen & Bent Sørensen (eds.), Umberto Eco in his own words, 119–126. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501507144-015Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1964. Eléments de sémiologie. Communications 4. 91–135. https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1964.1029.Search in Google Scholar
Cinzia Bianchi & Clare Vassallo (eds.). 2015. Umberto Eco’s interpretative semiotics: Interpretation, encyclopedia, translation. Special issue. Semiotica 206(1/4).10.1515/sem-2015-0017Search in Google Scholar
Bondanella, Peter. 1997. Umberto Eco and the open text: Semiotics, fiction, popular culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581755Search in Google Scholar
Dusi, Nicola. 2015. Intersemiotic translation: Theories, problems, analysis. Semiotica 206(1/4). 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0018.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1962. Opera aperta. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1964. Apocalittici e integrati. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1966. Per una indagine semiologica sul messaggio televisivo. Rivista di Estetica 2. 237–259.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1968. La struttura assente: Introduzione alla ricerca semiologica. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1973. Il costume di casa: Evidenze e misteri dell’ideologia italiana. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1973 [1967]. Per una guerriglia semiologica. Lecture at conference “Vision ‘67” in New York. In Il costume di casa: Evidenze e misteri dell’ideologia italiana, 418–431. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1975. Trattato di semiotica generale. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1977. Dalla periferia dell’impero. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1977 [1967]. Il cogito interruptus. In Dalla periferia dell’impero, 243–260. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1978. Can television teach? Screen Education 31. 15–24.10.1007/978-1-349-22426-5_7Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1983. Sette anni di desiderio. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1986. Travels in hyperreality. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1994. In Robert Lumley (ed.), Apocalypse postponed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1999. Spartacus. In Pierluigi Basso & Lucia Corrain (eds.), Eloquio del senso: Dialoghi semiotici per Paolo Fabbri, 149–158. Ancona & Milano:Costa & Nolan.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2000. La bustina di Minerva. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2001. Qualche osservazione a mo’ di conclusione. In Petitot Jean & Paolo Fabbri (eds.), Nel nome del senso: Intorno all’opera di Umberto Eco, 615–635. Milan: Sansoni.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2001 [1997]. Five moral pieces. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2006. A passo di gambero: Guerre calde e populismo mediatico. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2008. Turning back the clock: Hot wars and media populism. London: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2016. Pape Satàn Aleppe: Cronache di una società liquida. Milan: La nave di Teseo.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2017. Chronicles of a liquid society. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2018. In Gianfranco Marrone (ed.), Sulla televisione: Scritti 1956–2015. Milan: La nave di Teseo.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2018 [1973]. Il pubblico fa male alla televisione?. In Gianfranco Marrone (ed.), Sulla televisione: Scritti 1956–2015, 247–269. Milan: La nave di Teseo.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2018 [1976]. Sentire due campane. In Gianfranco Marrone (ed.), Sulla televisione: Scritti 1956–2015, 277–281. Milan: La nave di Teseo.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2018 [1983]. TV: la trasparenza perduta. In Gianfranco Marrone (ed.), Sulla televisione: Scritti 1956–2015, 313–334. Milan: La nave di Teseo.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto & Paolo Fabbri. 1978. Progetto di ricerca sull’utilizzazione dell’information ambientale. Problemi dell’informazione 4. 555–597.Search in Google Scholar
Escudero Chauvel, Lucrecia. 2017. Cultural studies, ideology, and media texts. In Sara C. Beardsworth & Randall E. Auxier (eds.), The philosophy of Umberto Eco (Library of Living Philosophers 35), 555–597. Chicago: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar
Fabbri, Paolo. 1973. Le comunicazioni di massa in Italia: sguardo semiotico e malocchio della sociologia. Versus 5. 57–109.Search in Google Scholar
Fabbri, Paolo. 1998. La svolta semiotica. Roma & Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Farronato, Cristina. 2003. Eco’s chaosmos. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442674257Search in Google Scholar
Fowles, Jib. 1974. On chronocentrism. Futures 6(1). 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(74)90008-1.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statements: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. New York & London: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Lorusso, Anna Maria. 2018. Postverità. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Marrone, Gianfranco. 2001. Corpi sociali. Turin: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Marrone, Gianfranco. 2018. Eco e la televisione. In Gianfranco Marrone (ed.), Umberto Eco: Sulla televisione. Scritti 1956–2015, 467–515. Milan: La nave di Teseo.Search in Google Scholar
Norma Bouchard & Veronica Pravadelli (eds.). 1998. Umberto Eco’s alternative: The politics of culture and the ambiguities of interpretation. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Paolucci, Claudio. 2017. Umberto Eco: Tra ordine e avventura. Milano: Feltrinelli.Search in Google Scholar
Robey, David. 1990. Umberto Eco: Theory and practice in the analysis of the media. In Zygmunt G. Barański & Robert Lumley (eds.), Culture and conflict in postwar Italy, 160–177. London: Palgrave Macmillian.10.1007/978-1-349-20841-8_9Search in Google Scholar
Sangjin, Park. 2004. Reconsidering the implications of the “pre-semiotic” writings in Umberto Eco. In Charlotte Ross & Rochelle Sibley (eds.), Illuminating Eco: On the boundaries of interpretation, 123–138. Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
