Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T22:42:09.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Is Wrong with Global Bioethics? On the Limitations of the Four Principles Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2001

TUIJA TAKALA
Affiliation:
Practical Philosophy at the University of Turku, Finland

Abstract

Within the latter half of the 30-year history of bioethics there has been an increasing pressure to address bioethical issues globally. Bioethics is not traditionally a theory-based enterprise, rather the focus has been problem related. With the introduction of the global perspective, theory has, however, become more important. One of the best known, probably the best known, theory of bioethics is the one presented by Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress in their Principles of Biomedical Ethics in 1979. This theory is known as the “four principles” or the “Georgetown mantra” approach or “mid-level principlism.” It is the attempt to create a global framework for bioethics on the four principles—autonomy, justice, beneficence, and nonmaleficence—that I will scrutinize in this paper.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: CULTURE, HEALTH, AND BIOETHICS: AT THE CROSSROADS
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)