Abstract
This research examines how the meaning of risk, safety, and accidents are constructed in a military context. We compare meanings of these constructs among members working for three organizations (Health and Safety Executive, Ministry of Defence, and Royal Marine Commandos) jointly responsible for planning and executing “safe” military training and maneuvres in a particular unit of the United Kingdom’s Royal Marine Commandos. The discourse among these members embodies the inter-organizational collaboration over military safety, and through an analysis of this discourse we situate and frame shared and contested meanings of risk, safety, and accidents within this particular community of practice. We discuss implications of these findings for theory and practice, rallying for a more contextualized understanding of what risk, safety, and accidents mean in organizational life and thus the relative nature of the standards to which organizations are expected to adhere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Araujo, L. (1998). Knowing and learning as networking. Management Learning, 29, 317–336. doi:10.1177/1350507698293004.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T.(1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
Boyce, M.E. (1995). Collective centring and collective sense-making in the stories and storytelling of one organization. Organization Studies, 16, 107–137. doi:10.1177/017084069501600106.
Burr, V. (1997) An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
Dutton, J.E., & Dukerich, J.M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554. doi:10.2307/256405.
Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Fox, N.J. (1999). Post-modern reflections: Deconstructing risk, health, and work. In N. Daykin & L. Doyal (Eds.). Health and work: Critical perspectives. London: MacMillan, pp. 198-219.
Gergen, K. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London, UK: Sage.
Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9, 7–18. doi:10.1177/105649260091002.
Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 191–223. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00298.
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). What do you mean by safety? Conflicting perspectives on accident causation and safety management in a construction firm. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6, 202–213. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.00089.
Health and Safety Executive (2000). The Health and Safety Executive and You. Sudbury, UK: HSE Books.
Hernes, T. (2004). Studying composite boundaries: A framework of analysis. Human Relations, 57, 9–29. doi:10.1177/0018726704042712.
International Q.S.R (2000). NVivo. Melbourne, Australia: QSR.
Kelloway, E.K., Stinson, V., & MacLean, C. (2004). Can eyewitness research improve occupational health and safety? Towards a research agenda. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 115–128. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000015006.67141.44.
King, N. 1998, Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.). Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide. London, UK: Sage, pp. 118-134.
Krimsky, S., & Golding, G. (Eds.). (1992). Social theories of risk. Westport, CN: Praeger.
Ministry of Defence (1999). September. Explaining the defence mission . London, UK: White Crescent Press Ltd.
Nichols, T. (1997). The sociology of industrial injury. London: Continuum.
Parboteeah, K.P., & Kapp, E.A. (2008). Ethical climates and workplace safety behaviors: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 515–529. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9452-y.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C.(2002), Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pidgeon, N. (1998). Safety culture: Key theoretical issues. Work and Stress, 12, 202–216. doi:10.1080/02678379808256862.
Rochlin, G.I. (1999). Safe operation as a social construct. Ergonomics, 42, 1549–1560. doi:10.1080/001401399184884.
Watson, T.J. (1995). Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale. Organization Studies, 16, 805–821. doi:10.1177/017084069501600503.
Weick, K.E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652. doi:10.2307/2393339.
Weick, K.E., & Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 356–381.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S.J. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London, UK: Sage.
Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching for safety. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2004). Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: Scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 322–333. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.322.
Zoller, H.M. (2003). Health on the line: Identity and disciplinary control in employee occupational health and safety discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 118–139. doi:10.1080/0090988032000064588.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, N., Tennant, S.J. “As far as is Reasonably Practicable”: Socially Constructing Risk, Safety, and Accidents in Military Operations. J Bus Ethics 91, 21–33 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0065-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0065-5