Skip to main content
Log in

The shortest possible length of the longest implicational axiom

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A four-valued matrix is presented which validates all theorems of the implicational fragment, IF, of the classical sentential calculus in which at most two distinct sentence letters occur. The Wajsberg/Diamond-McKinsley Theorem for IF follows as a corollary: every complete set of axioms (with substitution and detachment as rules) must include at least one containing occurrences of three or more distinct sentence letters.

Additionally, the matrix validates all IF theses built from nine or fewer occurrences of connectives and letters. So the classic result of Jaskovski for the full sentential calculus —that every complete axiom set must contain either two axioms of length at least nine or else one of length at least eleven—can be improved in the implicational case: every complete axiom set for IF must contain at least one axiom eleven or more characters long.

Both results are “best possible”, and both apply as well to most subsystems of IF, e.g., the implicational fragments of the standard relevance logics, modal logics, the relatives of implicational intutionism, and logics in the Łukasiewicz family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diamond, A. H. and J. C. C. McKinsey, “Algebras and their subalgebras,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 53 (1947), pp. 959–962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gladstone, M. D. “On the number of variables in the axioms,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 11 (1970), pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jaśkowski, S., “Trois contributions au calcul des propositions bivalent,” Studia Societatis Scientiarum Toruniensis, section A, vol. 1 (1948), pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalicki, J., “Note on truth-tables,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 15 (1950), pp. 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Łoś, J., O matrycach logicznych, Travaux de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Wroclaw, series B, no. 19, 1949.

  6. Prior, A. N., Formal Logic, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sobociński, B., “Axiomatization of a partial system of three-value calculus of propositions,” Journal of Computing Systems, Vol. 1 (1952), pp. 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ulrich, D., “A five-valued model of the E-p-q-theses” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 29 (1988), pp. 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ulrich, D., “Small matrices validating the two-variable theses of the classical equivalential and implicational calculi,” Technical Report TR-ARP-6/88, Automated Reasoning Project, RSSS, Australian National University, 1988.

  10. Wajsberg, M., “Aksjomatyzacja trójwartościowego rachunku zdań,” Comptes rendus des séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, C1, iii, vol. 24 (1931), pp. 126–145. English translation in Polish Logic 1920–1939, ed. S. McCall, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967, pp. 264–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Earlier proofs of these results, utilizing a five-valued matrix built from the product matrix of C2 with itself via the method of [8], were obtained in 1988 while the author was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Automated Reasoning Project, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, and were presented in [9]. The author owes thanks to the RSSS for creating the Project, and to the members of the Project generally for the stimulating atmosphere they created in turn, but especially to Robert K. Meyer for making the visit possible, and for many discussions over the years.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulrich, D. The shortest possible length of the longest implicational axiom. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 101–108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357843

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357843

Keywords

Navigation