Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of Distributive Justice on Lying for and Stealing from a Supervisor

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a controlled laboratory experiment, we found evidence for our predictions that participants who received fair distributive treatment were more likely to lie to give a supervisor a good performance evaluation than those treated unfairly, and those who received unfair distributive treatment were more likely to steal money from a supervisor than those treated fairly. We further proposed that the presence of an ethical code of conduct would moderate these relationships such that when the code was present these relationships would be weaker than when the code was absent, but we failed to find support for these moderating effects. Our findings suggest that the relationship between distributive justice and unethical behavior is likely more complex than previously considered. Both researchers and managers may benefit from a broader understanding of the factors that motivate and inhibit unethical behaviors intended to benefit and harm supervisors and/or organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J.S. 1965, ‘Inequity in social exchange’, In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press. 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaah, I. P. and E. A. Riordan: 1989, ‘Judgments of Marketing Professionals about Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension’, Journal of Marketing Research 26(1), 112–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, J.L., & Webb, A.P. (1995). Business ethics: A view from the trenches. Chemical Technology, 25, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. 1964, ‘Exchange and power in social life’, (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, M.: 2002, ‘Employee Dishonesty Risk Requires Careful Approach’, Business Insurance 36(16), 12. April 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, P., & Resnik, A. (1993). SMR forum: too many hands in the corporate cookie jar. Sloan Management Review, 24, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, V. J.: 1992, ‘Predicting Ethical Values and Training Needs in Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 761–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleek, M.A., & Leonard, S.L. (1998). Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure’. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H., & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–446. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D.E., Mohler, C.J., & Schminke, M. 2001, ‘Three roads to organizational justice’. In J. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management. 20, 1–113. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O.C., & Skinner, S.J. (1988). Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 103–109. doi:10.2307/3172930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flandez, R.: 2008, ‘Managing Technology – Stop That Thief: Losses from Theft and Fraud can Sink a Small Business; Technology Offers Welcome Relief’, The Wall Street Journal, June 16

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. 1998, ‘Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management’. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. 1985, ‘Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems’. In: K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Greenwich CT: JAI. pp 141–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 165–167. doi:10.2307/2092623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1988). Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 606–613. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.73.4.606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(1), 81–103. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 985–1003. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00039-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R., & Kacmar, K.M. (1991). Laboratory research in management - Misconceptions and missed opportunities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(4), 301–311. doi:10.1002/job.4030120405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W., & Sims, H. (1979). Organizational philosophy, policies, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3), 331–338. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.64.3.331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A. and D. P. Skarlicki: 2005, ‘The Effects of Overhearing Peers Discuss and Authority’s Fairness Reputation on Reactions to Subsequent Treatment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 90(2), 363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, C.: 1996, ‘Secretaries Often Face Ethical Dilemma on Job: Many Follow Their Bosses’ Orders to Lie or Violate Rules, Fearing for Their Jobs if They Refuse’, The Orange County Register D09

  • Laczniak, G., & Inderrieden, E. (1987). The influence of stated organizational concern upon ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 297–307. doi:10.1007/BF00382939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, C. M.: 1987, ‘Codes of Ethics: Organizational Behavior and Misbehavior’, in W. E. Frederick (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 9 (JAI, Greenwich, CT), pp. 107–130

  • McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterield, K.D. (1996). The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 461–476. doi:10.2307/3857499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. (2000). Business ethics: Practical proposals for organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 169–184. doi:10.1023/A:1005939232327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGurn, T.: 1988, ‘Spotting the Thieves Who Work Among Us’, Wall Street Journal, March 7

  • Organ, D.W. 1988, ‘Organizational Citizenship Behavior’, (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D.W. 1990, ‘The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior’. In: B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich CT: JAI Press. 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. The Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–462. doi:10.1086/323732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effects of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 382–408. doi:10.2307/2393373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlessinger, L., & Vogel, S. 1998, ‘The Ten Commandments’. New York City: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., & Vitell, S.J. (1990). Marketing ethics: factors influencing perceptions of ethical problems and alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing, 12, 4–18. doi:10.1177/027614679001000102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. (2001). Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: A study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(2), 186–195. doi:10.1023/A:1006457810654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. 1975, ‘Procedural justice: A psychological analysis’. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations - A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617. doi:10.2307/258313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. 1990, ‘A cultural perspective on changing and developing organizational etbics’. In: R. Woodman & W. Passmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development. Greenwicb, CT: JAI Press. 195–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Johnson, A. (2005). Codes of Ethics, Orientation Programs, and the Perceived Importance of Employee Incorruptibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 45–53. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7057-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R. (1993). Corporate codes of ethics: Purpose, process, and content issues. Business & Society, 32, 44–58. doi:10.1177/000765039303200106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L.K., & Cochran, P.L. (1999). ‘Corporate ethics practices in the Mid-1990’s: An empirical study of the Fortune 1000’. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 283–294. doi:10.1023/A:1005726901050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W., & Nantel, J. (1992). Corporate codes of ethics and sales force behavior: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 753–760. doi:10.1007/BF00872307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. (1988). ‘The effectiveness of corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(5), 389–395. doi:10.1007/BF00382543

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth E. Umphress.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Umphress, E.E., Ren, L.R., Bingham, J.B. et al. The Influence of Distributive Justice on Lying for and Stealing from a Supervisor. J Bus Ethics 86, 507–518 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9861-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9861-6

Keywords

Navigation