Abstract
Previous work indicates that when appropriate methods are used, recognition memory for words does not differ as a function of the length of the study list (Schulman, 1974). There are theoretical reasons for believing that recognition errors and length of study list should be directly related. In Schulman’s study, only the first 25 words in the study lists of different lengths were tested. In the present study, only the last 20 words in the lists of different lengths were tested. Recognition errors increased as length of study list increased. The theoretical reasons for expecting this outcome were not supported by internal analysis of errors. The discrepancy between the present finding and that of Schulman may indicate that the relationship between length of list and errors occurs only when proactive effects can influence the words tested, although just what these proactive effects might be is unclear.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bower, G. H., & Bostrom, A. Absence of within-list PI and RI in short-term recognition memory. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 10, 211–212.
Schulman, A. I. The declining course of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 14–18.
Underwood, B. J., & Brown, A. S. Interference in recognition memory: A replication. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975, 5, 263–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Underwood, B.J. Recognition memory as a function of length of study list. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 12, 89–91 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329636
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329636