Religious ExemptionsKevin Vallier, Michael E. Weber Exemptions from legal requirements, especially religious exemptions, have been a major topic of political debate in recent years. For example, bakers in various states have sought the right to refuse to make wedding cakes for gay and lesbian couples, despite the Supreme Court's validation of same-sex marriage. Many parents are granted exemptions from vaccinating their children, despite public health laws requiring otherwise. Various religious organizations as well as some corporations have sought an exemption from the requirement to provide contraceptive coverage in employee healthcare plans, as required by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Religious exemptions have a long history in the United States, but they remain controversial. Exemptions release some people from following laws that everyone else must follow, raising questions of fairness, and exemptions often privilege religious belief, raising concerns about equal treatment. At the same time there are good reasons to support exemptions, such as respect for the right of religious freedom and preventing religious organizations from becoming too closely intertwined with government. The essays in this volume represent valuable contributions to the complex debate about exemptions from legal requirements. In particular, they contribute to the moral dimensions of religious exemptions. These essays go beyond legal analysis about which exemptions are constitutionally appropriate, and ask instead when religious exemptions are morally required or morally prohibited. |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
An Egalitarian View | 9 |
2 On the Constitutionality and Political Morality of Granting ConscienceProtecting Exemptions Only to Religious Believers | 21 |
3 How Should We Treat Religion? On Exemptions and Exclusions | 37 |
4 Contempt Futility and Exemption | 59 |
5 Legal Exemptions for Religious Feelings | 74 |
6 Political Liberalism and Religious Exemptions | 97 |
7 Religious Accommodation Social Justice and Public Education | 120 |
A Normative Map | 138 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
apply argue argument basis Brian Leiter Cambridge choice claimants claims commitments common knowledge compelling conscience exemptions conscientious objector consider constitutional contraceptive criminal doctrine Employment Division epistemic Establishment Clause ethics example free and equal free exercise Free Exercise Clause freedom of religion futility principle gious granted grounds Hobby Lobby Ibid individual insincere Islam issue John Rawls justice justified Koppelman Law Review LeBel Leiter liberal democracies mandate McLachlin moral Muslims neutral neutralitarianism niqab niqabi witnesses normative objection obligation one’s people’s persons Philosophy plaintiffs political liberals protection public reason question Rawls refuse relevant reli religion-based exemptions religious accommodation religious beliefs religious conscience religious exemptions religious feelings religious freedom religious liberty religious practice religious reasons religious sincerity require RFRA Robert Audi rule secular cost Sherbert sincerity test social state’s substantial burden Supreme Court tion University Press vaccine vaccine exemptions Vallier values violate waivers Yoder