Abstract
Scholars have long considered de Philosophia and de Caelo to be in contradiction regarding the nature of the heavenly bodies, particularly with respect to the activity proper to the element composing them. According to the accounts we have of de Philosophia, Aristotle seems to have put forth that stars move because they have minds, and, according to Cicero’s account of the lost text, they choose their actions out of free will. In de Caelo, however, Aristotle seems only to consider that stars engage in the activity of circular motion because it is in their nature to do so, as it is in the nature of, e.g. fire to move upwards or Earth to move downwards. In this paper, I argue against the longstanding view that there is an incompatibility between these two “early” cosmological texts of Aristotle. I aim to show that these two texts endorse complementary, not contradictory, views of the heavenly bodies. I argue that in de Philosophia, Aristotle attributes to stars the intellective counterpart of the spatial motion which is developed in greater depth in de Caelo, while in de Caelo, we see hints of Aristotle’s view in de Philosophia that the stars are also minds and are able to rationally cognize their particular good – a point which is shown in de Caelo 292a18–293a14, where Aristotle attributes both life and praxis to the heavenly bodies. The overarching view which I present of these two texts is that while de Caelo approaches the heavenly bodies qua bodies and de Philosophia approaches them qua minds, they are still examining one and the same substance and that Aristotle has not changed his mind regarding the basic nature of such a substance in the (supposed) interim between writing de Philosophia and de Caelo. Rather, we find echoes of de Caelo in de Philosophia, and echoes of de Philosophia in de Caelo, which speaks to the fact that Aristotle maintains one view of the heavenly bodies which he presents over the course of these two texts.
Funding source: European Research Council
Award Identifier / Grant number: AdG 885273
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their excellent and invaluable feedback.
-
Research funding: The work for this article has been accomplished within the framework of the ERC project PlatoViaAristotle (AdG 885273).
References
Belfiore, E. 1983. “Aristotle’s Concept of praxis in the Poetics.” The Classical Journal 79 (2): 110–25.Search in Google Scholar
Bignone, E. 2007a. “Alla Riconquista dell’Aristotele Perduto.” In L’Aristotele Perduto e La Formazione Filosofica di Epicuro, 141–201. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Bignone, E. 2007b. “Epicuro e il ‘de Philosophia’ di Aristotele.” In L’Aristotele Perduto e La Formazione Filosofica di Epicuro, 671–723. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Bignone, E. 2007c. “Appendice al Capitolo III: Una Nuova Meta Nella Riconquista dell’Aristotele Perduto (L’endelechia).” In L’Aristotele Perduto e La Formazione Filosofica di Epicuro, 202–51. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Bodéüs, R. 2000. Aristotle and the Theology of the Living Immortals. New York: Suny Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. 1989. Cosmic and Meta-Cosmic Theology in Aristotle’s Lost Dialogues. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004246652Search in Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. 2018. Aristotle on God’s Life-Generating Power and on Pneuma as its Vehicle. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dumoulin, B. 1981. Recherches sur le premier Aristote. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Effe, B. 1970. Studien zur Kosmologie und Theologie der Aristotelischen Schrift “Über die Philosophie”. Munich: Verlag G. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2011. A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520268487.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1933. “The Development of Aristotle’s Theology.” CQ 2: 162–72, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800016918.Search in Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C., trans. 1939. Aristotle’s on the Heavens. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hahm, D. 1983. “The fifth element in Aristotle’s de philosophia: a critical Reexamination.” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2, edited by J. P. Anton, and P. Anthony, 404–30. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
Heitz, E. 1865. Die Verlorenen Schriften des Aristoteles. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Humbert, J., and G. Fohlen. 1931. Cicéron: Tusculanes I–II. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1923. Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar
Kouremenos, T. 2003. “Aristotle’s argument in De Cael. I.3–4 for the indestructibility of aether and Eudoxus’ theory of homocentric spheres.” Classica et mediaevalia 54: 157–84.Search in Google Scholar
Lefebvre, D. 2016. “Aristotle and the Hellenistic Peripatos: from Theophrastus to Critolaus.” In Brill’s Companion To the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, edited by A. Falcon, 11–34. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004315402_003Search in Google Scholar
Leggatt, S. 1995. Aristotle: On the Heavens, Books I and 2. Liverpool: Liverpool Univ. Press.10.3828/liverpool/9780856686627.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2007. Aristotle on Prayer. Rhizai IV(2): 295–309.10.1007/978-1-59745-294-6_15Search in Google Scholar
Moreau, J. 1939. L’âme du monde de Platon aux Stoiciens. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Mueller, Ian, trans. 2014. Simplicius: On Aristotle’s On the Heavens. 2.10-14. Bloomsbury, London.Search in Google Scholar
Noble, C. 2013. “Topsy-Turvy World: Circular Motion, Contrariety, and Aristotle’s Unwinding Spheres.” Apeiron 46 (4): 391–418, https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2013-0011.Search in Google Scholar
Pépin, J. 1964. Théologie cosmique et théologie crétienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar
Rackham, H., trans. 1926. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rose, V. 1893. Pseudepigraphus. B. G. Teubneri, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W.D., trans., ed. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198141099.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. trans., eds. 1952. Works of Aristotle Vol. XII: Select Fragments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W.D., ed. 1955. Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2006. “Natural Philosophy in the Peripatos After Strato.” In Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation and Discussion, edited by W. W. Fortenbaugh, and W. A. Stephen, 307–27. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351322041-8Search in Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 2001. “Aristotle’s de Philosophia.” In Collected Papers (1962–1999). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004453289_020Search in Google Scholar
Theiler, W. 1924. Zur Geschichte der teleologischen Naturbetrachtung bis auf Aristoteles. Zürich: Füssli.Search in Google Scholar
Tredennick, H., and C. G. Armstrong, trans. 1935. Aristotle: Metaphysics, Oeconomica, Magna Moralia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
von Arnim, H. 1931. “Die Entstehung der Gotteslehre des Aristoteles.” Wien, Leipzig:Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky. Reprinted (1969) as “Die Entwicklung der Aristotelischen Gotteslehre.” In Metaphysik und Theologie des Aristoteles, edited by F. P. Hager, 1–74. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston