Skip to main content
Log in

Endogenous correlated equilibria in noncooperative games

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the results of modern game theory presuppose that the choices rational agents make in noncooperative games are probabilistically independent. In this paper I argue that there is noa priori reason for rational agents to assume probabilistic independence. I introduce a solution concept for noncooperative games called anendogenous correlated equilibrium, which generalizes the Nash equilibrium concept by dropping probabilistic independence. I contrast the endogenous correlated equilibrium with the correlated equilibrium defined by Aumann (1974, 1987). I conclude that in general the endogenous correlated equilibrium concept is a more appropriate solution concept for noncooperative game theory than the less general Nash equilibrium concept. I close by discussing the relationship between endogenous correlated equilibrium and the game solution concept calledrationalizability introduced by Bernheim (1984) and Pearce (1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann, Robert: 1974, ‘Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies’,Journal of Mathematical Economics,1, 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, Robert: 1987, ‘Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality’,Econometrica,55(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. Douglas: 1984, ‘Rationalizable Strategic Behavior’,Economtrica,52(4), 1007–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, Adam and Dekel, Eddie: 1987, ‘Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria’,Econometrica,55(6), 1391–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, Adam and Dekel, Eddie: 1988, ‘The Role of Common Knowledge Assumptions in Game Theory’, inThe Economics of Missing Markets, Information and Games, ed. Frank Hahn, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, Drew and Tirole, Jean: 1992,Game Theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John: 1977,Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John and Selten, Reinhard, 1988:A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1969,Convention: A Philosophical Study, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. Duncan and Raiffa, Howard: 1957,Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey, Wiley Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, John: 1951, ‘Non-Cooperative Games’,Annals of Mathematics,54, 286–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, David: 1984, ‘Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection’,Econometrica,52(4), 1029–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Leonard J.: 1972,The Foundations of Statistics, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, Martin: 1982,Game Theory in the Social Sciences, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, Brian: 1990,The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, Brian: 1991, ‘Inductive Deliberation, Admissible Acts, and Perfect Equilibrium’, inEssays in the Foundations of Rational Decision, eds. Michael Bacharach and Susan Hurley, pp. 220–241.

  • Vanderschraaf, Peter: 1992, ‘Endogenous Correlated Equilibria and Dynamic Correlation-Deliberation’, working paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanderschraaf, P. Endogenous correlated equilibria in noncooperative games. Theor Decis 38, 61–84 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083169

Keywords

Navigation