Abstract
This commentary addresses the question of the meaning of critique in relation to objectivism or dogmatism. Inspired by Kant’s critical philosophy and Husserl’s phenomenology, it defines the first in terms of conditionality, the second in terms of oppositionality. It works out an application on the basis of Salthe’s (Found Sci 15 4(6):357–367, 2010a) paper on development and evolution, where competition is criticized in oppositional, more than in conditional terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deleuze G., Guattari F. (1996) What is philosophy. Columbia University Press, New York Chichester, West Sussex, p 256
Fairlamb, H. (2010). Must complex systems theory be materialistic? Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9212-9. arXiv:0912.5508v2.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology—An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (David Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Kant, I. (1997 [1781–1787]). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salthe S.N. (2010a) Development (and evolution) of the Universe. Foundations of Science 15 4(6): 357–367. doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9181-z. arXiv:0912.5508v2.
Salthe, S. N. (2010b). Materialism: Replies to comments from readers. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9214-7. arXiv:0912.5508v2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van de Vijver, G. Friends of Wisdom?. Found Sci 17, 5–7 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9213-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9213-8