Skip to main content
Log in

On Heidegger’s Actuality

  • Reply
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 24 December 2015

The Original Article was published on 17 October 2015

Abstract

In my reply to the commentaries by Babette Babich and Robert C. Scharff I make a distinction between critical remarks and additions that are relevant for my view on philosophy for substantive reasons and others that relate to a style or way of philosophizing. My reply to Scharff concerns the latter. I continue to defend an updated version of Heidegger’s thinking about technology, which I bring together with elements from the work of Don Ihde and Andrew Feenberg. I read all this from the perspective of a neo-pragmatist way of philosophizing, explicitly inspired by Richard Rorty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Van den Bossche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van den Bossche, M. On Heidegger’s Actuality. Found Sci 22, 265–267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9463-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9463-6

Keywords

Navigation