Skip to main content
Log in

The relation of biology to physics and chemistry — An evaluation of some recent issues in the philosophy of science

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckner, M. (1968). The biological way of thought. - Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, VIII+200 p. (first edition: 1959, New York: Columbia Univ. Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, M. (1962). Explanation, prediction, and “imperfect” knowledge. - In:H. Feigl andG. Maxwell, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science III, p. 231–271, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1956). The methodological character of theoretical concepts. - In:H. Feigl andM. Scriven, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science I, p. 38–76, Minneapolis, Univ. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical foundations of physics. - New York, London: Basic Books, VII + 300 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad-Martius, H. (1961). Die Selbstaufbau der Natur. - München: Kösel-Verlag, 498 p. (2nd edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. (1966). Of molecules and man. - Seattle and London: Univ. of Washington Press, 99 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, D. (1968). A defense of vitalism. - J. theoret. Biol. 20, p. 338–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser, W. M. (1958). The physical foundation of biology. - London, New York, Paris and Los Angeles: Pergamon Press, X + 236 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1966). Atom and organism, a new approach to theoretical biology. - Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 143 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K. (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. - In:H. Feigl andG. Maxwell, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science III, p. 28–97, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1963). How to be a good empiricist — a plea for tolerance in matters epistemological. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar II, p. 3–40, New York, London, Sydney: Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1965). Reply to criticism. - In:R. S. Cohen andM. W. Wartofsky, Boston studies in the philosophy of science II, p. 223–262, New York: Humanites Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, B. (1963). The relation of the physical sciences to biology. Indeterminacy and causality. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar I, p. 223–248, New York, London, Sydney: Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A. (1963). Temporally asymmetric principles, parity between explanation and prediction, and mechanism versus teleology. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar I, p. 57–96, New York, London, Sydney; Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. (1963). Retroductive inference. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar I, p. 57–96, New York, London, Sydney: Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1962). Deductive-nomological vs. statistical explanation. - In:H. Feigl andG. Maxwell, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science III, p. 98–169, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1963). Explanation and prediction by covering laws. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar I, p. 107–136, New York, London, Sydney: Interscience publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1966). Philosophy of natural science. - London: Prentice Hall, 116 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andP. Oppenheim (1953). The logic of explanation. - In:H. Feigl andM. Brodbeck, Readings in the philosophy of science, p. 319–352, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (original article: 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, K. (1959). Teleological explanations and terms in biology. - Ann. Zool. Soc. ‘Vanamo’ 19, no. 6, 73 p.

  • Mainx, F. (1955). Foundations of biology. - International encyclopedia of unified science I, no. 9, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 86 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. - Science 134, p. 1501–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenbesser, S. (1963). The explanatory-predictive approach to science. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar I, p. 41–56, New York, London, Sydney: Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1953). Teleological explanation and teleological systems. - In:H. Feigl andM. Brodbeck, Readings in the philosophy of science, p. 539–558, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (original article: 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1961). The structure of science. - New York, Chicago, Burlingame: Harcourt, Brace and World, X + 618 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. - London: Hutchinson and co.; London and New York: Basic Books, 480 p. (translation of “Logik der Forschung”, 1935, with new additions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1965). How not to talk about meaning. - In:R. S. Cohen andM. W. Wartofsky, Boston studies in the philosophy of science II, p. 205–222, New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotschuh, K. E. (1963). Theorie des Organismus. - München, Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg (2nd edition), XI + 407 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1959). Explanation and prediction in evolutionary biology. - Science 130, p. 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1962). Explanations, predictions and laws. - InH. Feigl andG. Maxwell, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science III, p. 170–230, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1963). The temporal asymmetry of explanations and predictions. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar I, p. 97–106, New York, London, Sydney: Interscience publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1963). Theoretical explanation. - In:B. Baumrin, Philosophy of science, the Delaware seminar II, p. 61–78, New York, London, Sydney: Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1965). Scientific realism or irenic instrumentalism. - In:R. S. Cohen andM. W. Wartofsky, Boston studies in the philosophy of science II, p. 171–204, New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C. (1965). Conflicting views about explanation. - In:R. S. Cohen andM. W. Wartofsky, Boston studies in the philosophy of science II, p. 157–170, New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerhoff, G. (1950). Analytical biology. - London: Oxford Univ. Press, 208 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanadham, C. R. (1968). Entropy, evolution and living systems. - Nature 219, p. 653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. A. (1968). Increasing entropy of biological systems. - Nature 219, p. 534–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H. (1952). Biology and language. - Cambridge, at the Univ. Press, XIII + 364 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Der Steen, W.J. The relation of biology to physics and chemistry — An evaluation of some recent issues in the philosophy of science. Acta Biotheor 19, 186–211 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01556091

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01556091

Keywords

Navigation