Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stakeholders Pressures and Strategic Prioritisation: An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Responses in Argentinean Firms

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focusses on corporate attitudes to stakeholder environmental pressures in Argentina. It uses a cross section survey of 505 CEOs of Argentinean firms to gather information on environmental attitudes and a stakeholder theory framework to design and interpret the statistical analyses. It is underpinned by theoretical and empirical findings in the literature on stakeholder management, targeting in particular studies that deal with corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Latin America. Its general aim is to gain a deeper empirical understanding of the coherence between managers’ perceptions of stakeholder pressures and the importance they are given in corporate CSR strategies through an empirical investigation of environmental management (EM) decisions. In doing so, it uncovers general differences in the way firms perceive and treat groups of stakeholders. It also detects variations across firms, observing that some are typically proactive in their response to stakeholder pressures whilst others are less responsive. Profiling the various stakeholder networks and the corporate response strategies in this way encourages the development of stakeholder-focussed policies and corporate strategies that emphasise communications, awareness and a clear sense of direction. It concludes that CSR appears to be more effective in the protection of the environment than previously reported. Although this study focusses on EM in Argentina, the findings are more generally applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaltonen K., K. Jaakko and O. Tuoumas: 2008, ‘Stakeholder Salience in Global Projects’, International Journal of Project Management 26, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A. and J. Ganapathi: 2007. ‘Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., D. Dunphy and A. Martin: 2008, ‘Governance of Environmental Risk: New Approaches to Managing Stakeholder Involvement’, Journal of Environmental Management (in press). doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.011.

  • Birdsall, N. and D. Wheeler: 1992, ‘Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens?’, in P. Low (ed.), International Trade and the Environment, World Bank Discussion Paper 159 (World Bank, Washington DC), pp. 159–167.

  • Black, L.D. and C. Hartel: 2004, ‘The Five Capabilities of Socially Responsible Companies’. Journal of Public Affairs, 4 (2), 125-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, N.: 2000, ‘Environmental Visibility: A Trigger of Green Organizational Response?’ Business Strategy and the Environment, 9, 92-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. N. and P. L. Cochran: 1991, ‘The Stakeholder Model Of The Firm: Implications For Business And Society Research’, in F. J. Mahon (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (International Association for Business and Society, Sundance), pp. 449–467.

  • Buysse, K. and A. Verbeke, A.: 2003, ‘Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholder Management Perspective’, Strategic Management Journal, 24 (5), 453-470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B.: 1979, ‘A Three-Dimensional Model of Corporate Performance’, Academy of Management Review , 4 (4), 497-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. M.: 2006, ‘The Interaction of Top Management Group, Stakeholder, and Situational Factors on Certain Corporate Reputation Management Activities’, The Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1145-1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Céspedes-Lorente, J.; J. De Burgos-Jiménez and M. J. Álvarez-Gil: 2003, ‘Stakeholders′Environmental Influence. An Empirical Analysis in The Spanish Hotel Industry’, Scandinavian Journal of Management , 19, 333-358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D. and K. Husoy: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behaviour: The Case of the United Nations Global Impact’. Journal of Business Ethics, 76 (2), 163-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudnovsky, D., G. Pupato and V. Gutman: 2005, Environmental Management and Innovation in Argentine Industry: Determinants and Policy Implications, Documento Tecnico N° 36 (Fundación CENIT, Buenos Aires).

  • Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1991, ‘Defining, Evaluating, and Managing Corporate Social Performance: A Stakeholder Management Model’, in J. E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich), pp. 331–358.

  • Clarkson, M.B.E.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, S. J. and L. G. Steed: 1999, SPSS: Analysis without anguish. (John Wiley and Sons, Queensland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, F., S. Brammer and A. Millington: 2008, ‘Environmental Management in the United Kingdom: new survey evidence’, Management Decisions, 46 (2), 264-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darier, E.: 1999, Discourses of the Environment, (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., H. Hettige and D. Wheeler: 2000, ‘What Improves Environmental Performance: Evidence from the Mexican Industry’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(1), 39-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., B. Laplante and C. Meisner: 2001, ‘Environmental News in Argentina, Chile, Mexico and the Philippines’, Local Environment 5, 351-359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. and M. Toffel: 2008, ‘Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box’, Strategic Management Journal, 29 (10), 1027-1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drago, W.: 1998, ‘Predicting Organisational Objectives: Role of Stakeholder Influence and Volatility of Environmental Sectors’. Management Research, 21 (9), 16-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S.: 1997, The Politics of the Earth (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E. and R. B. Duncan: 1987, ‘The Creation of Momentum for Change through the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis’. Strategic Management Journal, 8 (3), 279-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland, G. S. and E. Jimenez: 1992, ‘Policy Instruments for Pollution Control in Developing Countries’, The World Bank Research Observer, 7 (2), 145-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzion, D.: 2008, ‘Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992- Present: A Review’, Journal of Management, 33, 637-664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y.: 2008, ‘The Stakeholder Model Refined’, Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.:1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , (Pitman Publishing, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Johnson, R.: 2000, Exporting Environmentalism: U S Multinational Chemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Benito, J. and O. Gonzalez-Benito: 2006, ‘A Review of Determinants Factors of Environmental Proactivity’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15 (2), 87-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grynspan, R. and B. Kliksberg: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America: Not a Waste of Time or Money’, Foreign Policy July/August, 167–169.

  • Guidi, M.: 2008, ‘Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study in Argentina from the Point of View of the Civil Society’, Nómadas: Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas 19(3), http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/pdf/181/18101919.pdf.

  • Guidi, M., J. Hillier and H. Tarbert.: 2008, ‘Maximizing the Firm’s Value to Society through Ethical Business Decisions: Incorporating “Moral Debt” Claims’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(4), 603-619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, P. A.: 2004. ‘The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean’, FOCAL Policy Papers; FPP-04-1, March, http://www.focal.ca/pdf/csr_04.pdf.

  • Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky: 1996, ‘The Determinants of an Environmental Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30 (3), 381-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky: 1999, ‘The Relationship between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance’. Academy of Management Journal , 42 (1), 87-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, K.: 2002, ‘After the boomerang: Environmental Movement and Politics in the La Plata River Basin’, Global Environment Politics, 2, 35-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, K.: 2003, ‘Fading Green? Environmental Politics in the Mercosur Free Trade Agreement’, Latin American Politics and Society, 45 (4), 1-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C.B. and E. R. Auster: 1990, ‘Proactive Environmental Management: Avoiding The Toxic Trap’, Sloan Management Review , 31 (2), 7-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., S. Wolfing and U. Fuhrer: 1999, ‘Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behavior’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. and M. Lenox: 2000, ‘Industry Self-regulation without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry′s Responsible Care Program’, Academy of Management Journal , 43 (4), 698-716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S., S. Maklan and P. French: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, H. and Ulhoi, J.P.: 2001, ‘Integrating Environmental and Stakeholder Management’, Business Strategy and the Environment , 10: 77-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Alier, J.: 2002, The Environmentalism of the Poor. A study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. (Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrandonas, A. and P. T. Strife: 1992, ‘Corporate Environmental Communications: Lessons from Investors’, Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(3, 4), 234-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.K.; B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward A Theory Of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining The Principles Of Who And What Really Counts’. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), 853-886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures’, Organization Environment, 21: 245-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-Luna, J.L.; C. Garcés-Ayerbe, C. and P. Rivera-Torres: 2008, ‘Why do Patterns of Environmental Response Differ? A Stakeholders’ Pressure Approach’. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (11), 1225-1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. and A. Muro: 2006, ‘Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Argentina: The Evolution of an Agenda’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24, 49-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatorio de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa: 2008, ‘Indicadores Temáticos de RSC’, http://www.observatoriorsc.org.

  • Orlitzky, M., F.L. Schmidt and S.L. Rynes: 2003, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis’, Organization Studies 24: 403–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peinado-Vara, E.: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, pp. 61-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., A. Russo and A. Tencati: 2007, ‘CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy’, Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza-Ubeda, J. A., J. Burgos-Jiménez, D. A. Vazquez-Brust and C. Liston-Heyes: 2009, ‘The Win-Win Paradigm and Stakeholder Integration’, Business Strategy and the Environment 18(8), 487–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M.J.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Theory Approach to Designing Environmental Marketing Strategy’, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 10, 29-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, J.E., L. E. Preston and S. Sachs: 2002, Redefining The Corporation: SM and Organizational Wealth’, (Stanford University Press: Stanford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L. and E. Fintel: 2002, ‘Environmental Management as an indicator of Business Responsibility in Central America’, in P. Utting (ed.), The Greening of Business in Developing Countries: Rhetoric, Reality and Prospects (Zed Books in association with UNRISD, London), pp. 41–57.

  • Pumpim de Oliveira, J.A. and M.A. Gardetti: 2006, ‘Analysing Changes to Prioritise Corporate Citizenship’, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 71- 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retolaza, J. L., M. Ruiz, M and L. San-Jose: 2009, ‘CSR in Business Start-Ups: An Application Method for Stakeholder Engagement’, Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16, 324–336

  • Richardson, T.: 1996, ‘Foucaldian Discourse: Power in Truth in the Policy Process’, European Planning Studies, 4 (3), 279-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Camino, J.: 2007, ‘Re-evaluating Green Marketing Strategy: a Stakeholder Perspective’, European Journal of Marketing, 11/12: 1328-1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N.: 1992, ‘Developing Environmental Management Systems’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 1, 11-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T.J.: 1997, Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory Of Stakeholder Influences. Academy Of Management Review , 22 (4), 887-910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Tagle, M. T.: 2003, ‘New Approaches to Environmental Regulation in Less Developed Countries: The Case of Chile’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‘Towards a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility. Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 32(4):1096-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S. (2006): ‘A View of Corporate Citizenship in Latin America’. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 21-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S.: 2000, ‘Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy’, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 4, 681-687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S.: 1999, ‘Local Policy for the Global Environment: In search of a New Perspective’, Environmental Politics, 8 (4) 137-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M.J.: 2002, ‘Measuring Corporate Performance by Building on the Stakeholders’ Model of Business Ethics’, Journal Of Business Ethics, 35, 143-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderbaum, P.: 1999, ‘Values, Ideology and Politics in Ecological Economics’, Ecological Economics 28, 161-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Baumgarten, G. and V.Yucetepe: 2009, ‘Multinational Firms’ Leadership Role in Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 217-224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulhøi, J. P. and H. Madsen.: 2005, ‘The Firm- Nature Relationship: Past Experiences and Future Challenges’, in S. Sharma and J. A. Aragón-Correa (eds.), Corporate Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham), pp. 210–232.

  • Van der Laan, G., H. Van Ees and A. Van Witteloostuijn: 2008, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Extended Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical Test with Accounting Measures,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 299-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Brust, D. A.: 2007, ‘An Attitudinal-Discursive Approach to Environmental Performance: The Case of Argentina’s Polluting Firms’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Royal Holloway University of London.

  • Vazquez-Brust, D. A: and C. Liston-Heyes: 2008, ‘Corporate Discourse and Environmental Performance in Argentina’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 179-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Brust, D. A. and C. Liston-Heyes: 2010, `Environmental Management Intentions: An Empirical Investigation of Argentina's Polluting Firms', Journal of Environmental Management 91, 1111–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Brust, D., J. A. Plaza-Úbeda, C. Natenzon and J. Burgos-Jiménez: 2009, ‘The Challenges of Businesses’ Intervention in Areas with High Poverty and Environmental Deterioration: Promoting an Integrated Stakeholders’ Approach in Management Education’, in C. Wankel and J. Stoner (eds.), Management Education for Global Sustainability (Information Age Publishing, New York), pp. 175–206.

  • Vives, A: 2006, Social and Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises in Latin America, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., K. Weber, and J. D. Margolis: 2003. Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29: 859-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S.L. and P. L. Cochran: 1985, ‘The Evolution of The Corporate Social Performance Model’, Academy of Management Review , 10: 758-769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. T., and G. E. Fryxell: 2004, ‘Stakeholder influences on Environmental Management Practices: A study of Fleet Operations in Honk Kong (SAR)’, China. Transportation Journal, 43(4), 22-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakhem, A.: 2008, ‘Stakeholders Management Capability: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach’, Journal of Business Ethics, 79: 395-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.

    D. A. Vazquez-Brust

  2. School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, U.K.

    C. Liston-Heyes

  3. Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Almería, Almeria, Spain

    J. A. Plaza-Úbeda & J. Burgos-Jiménez

Authors
  1. D. A. Vazquez-Brust
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Liston-Heyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. A. Plaza-Úbeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Burgos-Jiménez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Vazquez-Brust.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vazquez-Brust, D.A., Liston-Heyes, C., Plaza-Úbeda, J.A. et al. Stakeholders Pressures and Strategic Prioritisation: An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Responses in Argentinean Firms. J Bus Ethics 91 (Suppl 2), 171–192 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0612-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0612-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation