Skip to main content
Log in

An Obligation to Enhance?

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses some rather formal characteristics of possible obligations to enhance. Obligations to enhance can exist in the absence of good moral reasons. If obligation and duty however are considered as synonyms, the enhancement involved must be morally desirable in some respect. Since enhancers and enhanced can, but need not coincide, advertency is appropriate regarding the question who exactly is addressed by an obligation or a duty to enhance: the person on whom the enhancing treatment is performed, or the controller or the operator of the enhancement. Especially, the position of the operator is easily overlooked. The exact functionality of the specific enhancement, is all-important, not only for the acceptability of a specific form of enhancement, but also for its chances of success for becoming a duty or morally obligatory. Finally and most importantly, however, since obligations can exist without good moral reasons, there can be obligations to enhance that are not morally right, let alone desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azevedo MA (2016) The misfortunes of moral enhancement. J Med Philos 41:461–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck B (2015) Conceptual and practical problems of moral enhancement. Bioethics 29(4):233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick R (2008) Therapy, enhancement and improvement. In: Gordijn B, Chadwick R (eds), Medical enhancement and posthumanity. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan S, Harris J (2011) Moral enhancement and pro-social behavior. J Med Ethics 37(3):130–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas T (2008) Moral enhancement. J Appl Philos 25(3):228–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J, Savulescu J (2015) How moral is (moral) enhancement? A debate about moral enhancement. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 24:8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaming L, Vedder A (2009) Brushing up our memories. Can we use neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memory? Law, Innovat Technol 1(2):203–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roduit J, Heilinger J-C, Baumann, H (2015) Ideas of perfection and the ethics of human enhancement. Bioethics 29(9):622–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder A, Klaming L (2010) Human enhancement for the common good—using neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memory. AJOB Neurosci 1(3):22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Vedder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vedder, A. An Obligation to Enhance?. Topoi 38, 49–52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9483-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9483-7

Keywords

Navigation