Abstract
This article discusses some rather formal characteristics of possible obligations to enhance. Obligations to enhance can exist in the absence of good moral reasons. If obligation and duty however are considered as synonyms, the enhancement involved must be morally desirable in some respect. Since enhancers and enhanced can, but need not coincide, advertency is appropriate regarding the question who exactly is addressed by an obligation or a duty to enhance: the person on whom the enhancing treatment is performed, or the controller or the operator of the enhancement. Especially, the position of the operator is easily overlooked. The exact functionality of the specific enhancement, is all-important, not only for the acceptability of a specific form of enhancement, but also for its chances of success for becoming a duty or morally obligatory. Finally and most importantly, however, since obligations can exist without good moral reasons, there can be obligations to enhance that are not morally right, let alone desirable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azevedo MA (2016) The misfortunes of moral enhancement. J Med Philos 41:461–479
Beck B (2015) Conceptual and practical problems of moral enhancement. Bioethics 29(4):233–240
Chadwick R (2008) Therapy, enhancement and improvement. In: Gordijn B, Chadwick R (eds), Medical enhancement and posthumanity. Springer, Berlin
Chan S, Harris J (2011) Moral enhancement and pro-social behavior. J Med Ethics 37(3):130–131
Douglas T (2008) Moral enhancement. J Appl Philos 25(3):228–245
Harris J, Savulescu J (2015) How moral is (moral) enhancement? A debate about moral enhancement. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 24:8–22
Klaming L, Vedder A (2009) Brushing up our memories. Can we use neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memory? Law, Innovat Technol 1(2):203–221
Nussbaum M (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Roduit J, Heilinger J-C, Baumann, H (2015) Ideas of perfection and the ethics of human enhancement. Bioethics 29(9):622–630
Vedder A, Klaming L (2010) Human enhancement for the common good—using neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memory. AJOB Neurosci 1(3):22–33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vedder, A. An Obligation to Enhance?. Topoi 38, 49–52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9483-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9483-7