Abstract
Aristotle's conception and use of ta endoxa are key points to our understanding of Aristotelian dialectic. But, nowadays, they are not of historical or hermeneutic importance alone, as, in Aristotle's treatment of endoxa, we still see a relevant contribution to the modern study of argumentation. I propose here an interpretation of endoxa to that effect: namely, as plausible propositions. This version is not only defensible in the Aristotelian context, it may also shed new light on some of his assumptions and methodological shortcomings – e.g. concerning the 'plausible/implausible' pair –; finally, it will even enable us to show certain basic hints and guidelines, advanced by Aristotle's study of endoxa, which still serve nowadays to orientate our studies of argumentation from the angle of a theory of plausible argument currently under construction. These hints and guidelines suggest a pragmatic, gradual and comparative discursive concept of plausibility, and point, in particular, towards the reasonable dealing with, and weighing up of, differences of opinion within this frame of reference.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barnes, J.: 1980, 'Aristotle and the Method of Ethics', Revue International de Philosophie 34, 490-511. (Reprinted in T. Irwin (ed.), Aristotle's Ethics, Garland Publishing, New York/London, 1995, pp. 490-511.)
Barnes, J.: 1981, 'Proof and the Syllogism', in E. Berti (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The 'Posterior Analytics'Antenore, Padua, pp. 47-59.
Bolton, R.: 1990, 'The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic', in D. Devereux and P. Pelegrin (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, pp. 185-236.
Brunschwig, J.: 1986, 'Aristotle on Arguments without Winners or Losers', in P. Wapnewski (ed.), Wissenschaftskolleg Jarhbuch 1984/1985, Siedler, Berlin, pp. 31-40.
Brunschwig, J.: 1990, 'Remarques sur la communication de Robert Bolton', in D. Devereux and P. Pelegrin (eds.), o.c., pp. 237-262.
Burnyeat, M. F.: 1994, 'Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion', in D. J. Furley and A. Nehamas (eds.), Aristotle's Rhetoric. Philosophical Essays, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 3-55.
Cavini, W.: 1989, 'Modalità dialettiche nei Topicidi Aristotele', in G. Corsi et al. (eds.), Atti del Convegno Intern. di Storia della Logica(San Gimignano, 1987), CLUEB, Bologna, pp. 15-46.
Devereux, D.: 1990, 'Comments on Robert Bolton's The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic', in D. Devereux and P. Pelegrin (eds.), o.c., pp. 263-286.
Evans, J. D. F.: 1977, Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic, CUP, Cambridge.
Hamlyn, D. W.: 1990, 'Aristotle on Dialectic', Philosophy 65, 465-476.
Irwin, T. H.: 1988, Aristotle's First Principles, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Kienpointner, M.: 1992, Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern, Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt, Fromman-Holzboog.
Most, G. W.: 1994, 'The Uses of Endoxa: Philosopy and Rhetoric in the Rhetoric', in D. J. Furley and A. Nehamas (eds.), o.c., pp. 167-190.
Owen, G. E. L. 1961, 'Tithenai ta phainomena', in A. Mansion (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, Publications Universitaires, Louvain, pp. 83-103.
Reeve, C. D. C.: 1992, Practices of Reason. Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Rescher, N.: 1976, Plausible Reasoning, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Smith, R.: 1993, 'Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic', Synthese 93, 335-358.
Walton, D. N.: 1992, Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Weil, S.: 1975, 'The Place of Logic in Aristotle's Thought', in J. Barnes, M. Schofield and R. Sorabji (eds.), Articles on Aristotle. 1. Science, Duckworth, London, pp. 88-112. (Original versión, 1955, 'La place de la logique dans la pensée aristotélicienne', Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 56, 283-315.)
Wörner, M.: 1982, 'DeEnthymeme - Eine Rückgriff auf Aristoteles in systematischer Absicht', in O. Ballweg and T. M. Seiberg (eds.), Rhetorische Rechtstheorie, Karl Alber, Freiburg/Munich, pp. 73-98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vega Renon, L. Aristotle's Endoxa and Plausible Argumentation. Argumentation 12, 95–113 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007720902559
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007720902559