Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T13:38:34.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social robots and the intentional stance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

Walter Veit Open the ORCID record for Walter Veit [Opens in a new window]  and
Heather Browning Open the ORCID record for Heather Browning [Opens in a new window]
Walter Veit
Affiliation:
School of History and Philosophy of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia wrwveit@gmail.com; https://walterveit.com/
Heather Browning
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK DrHeatherBrowning@gmail.com; https://www.heatherbrowning.net/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why is it that people simultaneously treat social robots as mere designed artefacts, yet show willingness to interact with them as if they were real agents? Here, we argue that Dennett's distinction between the intentional stance and the design stance can help us to resolve this puzzle, allowing us to further our understanding of social robots as interactive depictions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e47
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1988). Précis of the intentional stance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, S., Ghiglino, D., Ciardo, F., Perez-Osorio, J., Baykara, E., & Wykowska, A. (2019). Do we adopt the intentional stance toward humanoid robots?. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Osorio, J., & Wykowska, A. (2019). Adopting the intentional stance towards humanoid robots. In Wording robotics (pp. 119–136). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spatola, N., Marchesi, S., & Wykowska, A. (2021). The intentional stance test-2: How to measure the tendency to adopt intentional stance towards robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 666586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veit, W. (2022). Revisiting the intentionality all-stars. Review of Analytic Philosophy, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.RAP.2022.0009Google Scholar
Veit, W., Dewhurst, J., Dołega, K., Jones, M., Stanley, S., Frankish, K., & Dennett, D. C. (2019). The rationale of rationalization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19002164CrossRefGoogle Scholar