Abstract
This article investigates the types of intentionality involved in human–technology relations. It aims to augment Don Ihde’s analysis of the relations between human beings and technological artifacts, by analyzing a number of concrete examples at the limits of Ihde’s analysis. The article distinguishes and analyzes three types of “cyborg intentionality,” which all involve specific blends of the human and the technological. Technologically mediated intentionality occurs when human intentionality takes place “through” technological artifacts; hybrid intentionality occurs when the technological actually merges with the human; and composite intentionality is the addition of human intentionality and the intentionality of technological artifacts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Some works of the artists discussed can be viewed at http://www.aias-artdesign.org/mediatedvision.
References
Bostrom, N. (2004). The future of human evolution. In Ch. Tandy (Ed.), Death and anti-death: two hundred years after Kant, fifty years after Turing (pp. 339–371). Palo Alto, CA: Ria University Press.
De Mul, J. (2002). Cyberspace Odyssee. Kampen: Klement.
Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). New York: Routledge.
Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The age of the world picture. In M. Heidegger (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper & Row (translated by W. Lovitt).
Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and Praxis. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ihde, D. (1983). Existential technics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.
Irrgang, B. (2005). Posthumanes Menschsein. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (translated by C. Porter).
Nietzsche, F. (1969/1883). Thus spoke Zarathustra: a book for everyone and no one. London: Penguin Books.
Sloterdijk, P. (1999). Regeln für den Menschenpark: Ein Antwortschreiben zu Heideggers Brief über den Humanismus. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Acknowledgement
This article was written with financial support of NWO, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verbeek, PP. Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations. Phenom Cogn Sci 7, 387–395 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9099-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9099-x