Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T11:37:34.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hume on Liberty and Necessity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Godfrey Vesey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

David Hume (1711–1776) described the question of liberty and necessity as ‘the most contentious question of metaphysics, the most contentious science’ (Hume [1748] 1975, p. 95). He was right about it being contentious. Whether it is metaphysical is another matter. I think that what is genuinely metaphysical is an assumption that Hume, and a good many other philosophers, make in their treatment of the question. The assumption is about language and reality. I call it ‘the conformity assumption’. But more about that shortly. Let us begin at the obvious beginning, by considering what the terms ‘liberty’ and ‘necessity’ mean in the expression ‘liberty and necessity’.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 20: Philosophers Ancient and Modern , March 1986 , pp. 111 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, (1941) The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited and with an introduction by McKeon, R. (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1971) Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. [1707–1710] (1975) Philosophical Works, introduction and notes by M. R. Ayers (London: Dent).Google Scholar
Black, M. (1961) ‘Making Something Happen’, in Hook, S. (ed.), Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1883) The Principles of Logic (London: KeganPaul, Trench & Co).Google Scholar
Brown, R. (ed.) (1970) Between Hume and Mill (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Brown, T. (1805) Observations on the Nature and Tendency of the Doctrine of Mr Hume Concerning the Relation of Cause and Effect (Edinburgh: Mundall and Son).Google Scholar
Campbell, G. [1776] (1823) The Philosophy of Rhetoric, 7th edn (London: William Baynes).Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. M. (1964) ‘Human Freedom and the Self’, in Watson, G. (ed.) (1982) Free Will (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1968) ‘Agency’, in Binkley, R., Bronaugh, R. and Marras, A. (eds) (1971) Agent, Action and Reason (Oxford: Blackwell) and in D. Davidson (1980) Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon).Google Scholar
Descartes, R. [1641] (1912) A Discourse on Method, Meditations on the First Philosophy, Principles of Philosophy, translated by Veitch, J., introduction by Lindsay, A. D. (London: Dent).Google Scholar
Hartley, D. [1749] (1834) Observations on Man, His Frame, His Duty and His Expectations, 6th edn (London: Thomas Tegg and Son).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. [1651] (1914) Leviathan, introduction by A. D. Lindsay (London: Dent).Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1739] (1888) A Treatise of Human Nature, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon).Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1748] (1975) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in Hume's Enquiries, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.) with revisions by P. Niddich (Oxford: Clarendon).Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1966) The Philosophy of Language (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Kolnai, A. (1966) ‘Agency and Freedom’, in Vesey, G. N. A. (ed.) (1968) The Human Agent, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, Vol. 1, 1966/1967 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Locke, J. [1690] (1961) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited with an introduction by Yolton, J. W. (London: Dent).Google Scholar
Malebranche, N. [1674–1675] (1980) The Search After Truth, translated by Lennon, T. M. and Olscamp, P. J. (Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. [1843] (1974) A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, Robson, J. M. (ed.), introduced by R. F. McRae, in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Plato, (1961) The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds) (New York: Pantheon).Google Scholar
Rhees, R. (1982) ‘Language and Reality’, The Gadfly 5, No. 2.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962) ‘Freedom and Resentment’, in Strawson, P. F. (ed.) (1968) Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action (Oxford University Press), P. F. Strawson (1974) Freedom and Resentment (London: Methuen) and in G. Watson (ed.) Free Will (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1966) Action and Purpose (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Thalberg, I. (1967) ‘Do We Cause Our Own Actions?’, Analysis 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A. [1768] (1834) The Light of Nature Pursued, 3rd edn (London: Thomas Tegg and Son).Google Scholar
Vesey, G. N. A. (1961) ‘Volition’, Philosophy 36, and in Gustafson, D. F. (ed.) (1967) Essays in Philosophical Psychology (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Vesey, G. (1982) ‘Is Talk a Mode of Transport?’, The Gadfly, 5, No. 4.Google Scholar
Weis, C. M. (ed.) (1970) Boswell in Extremes 1776–1778 (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations, translated by Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) The Blue and Brown Books (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1967) Zettel, Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. (eds), translated by G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980) Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki (eds), translated by C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Yolton, J. (1966) ‘Agent Causality’, American Philosophical Quarterly 3.Google Scholar