Abstract
It seems to be a phenomenon of contemporary life that we consider goodness embarrassing and rather dull. In contrast, the activities and inner lives of villains are deemed more complex and fascinating than those of good people. This paper attempts to understand the conception of goodness that underlies this phenomenon, and I suggest that informing it is the combination of two ideas, in tension with each other: firstly, a distorted understanding of the ancient conception of full virtue as the absence of all inner conflict; and secondly, the intuition that real goodness is only apparent and generated in inner conflict. In response, I offer an alternative picture of goodness as an ongoing, active and progressive relation to value, and conclude that in order to render goodness attractive again we need more adequate portraits of goodness from both philosophy and art.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, Robert Merrihew, Saints, The Journal of Philosophy 81(7) (1984), pp. 392–401.
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, tr. J.A.K. Thomson. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.
Augustine, Confessions, tr. Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Aurelius, Marcus, Meditations, tr. Maxwell Staniforth. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964.
Blum, Lawrence A., ‘Moral Exemplars’, in Peter A. French et al. (eds.), Ethical Theory: Character and Virtue (Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 13). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.
Gaskell, Elizabeth, The Life of Charlotte Brontë [1857]. London: Everyman, 1997.
Hadot, Pierre, Spiritual Exercises, inPhilosophy as a Way of Life, tr. Michael Chase. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
Kant, Immanuel, The Doctrine of Virtue, Part II ofThe Metaphysics of Morals [1797], tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals [1785], tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Mackie, J.L., Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.
Marcus, Aurelius, Meditations, tr. Maxwell Staniforth. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964.
Murdoch, Iris, A Fairly Honourable Defeat. London: Chatto and Windus, 1970.
Murdoch, Iris, The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge, 2000.
Murdoch, Iris, Vision and Choice in Morality, inExistentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature, Peter Conradi (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1997.
Murdoch, Iris, Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992.
Musil, Robert, The Man Without Qualities, tr. Eithne Wilkins and Ernst Kaiser. London: Secker and Warburg, 1953–1960.
Plato, The Republic, tr. Desmond Lee. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.
Rorty, Amélie, The Place of Contemplation in Aristotle'sNicomachean Ethics, in Amélie Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle's Ethics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1980.
Sherman, Nancy, Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Wiggins, David, Truth, Invention and the Meaning of Life, in Needs, Value, Truth:Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Wolf, Susan, Moral Saints, The Journal of Philosophy 79(8) (1982), pp. 419–439.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vice, S. On the Tedium of the Good. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 8, 459–476 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-8833-5
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-8833-5