Abstract
In this philosophical paper, we explore computational and biological analogies to address the fine-tuning problem in cosmology. We first clarify what it means for physical constants or initial conditions to be fine-tuned. We review important distinctions such as the dimensionless and dimensional physical constants, and the classification of constants proposed by Lévy-Leblond. Then we explore how two great analogies, computational and biological, can give new insights into our problem. This paper includes a preliminary study to examine the two analogies. Importantly, analogies are both useful and fundamental cognitive tools, but can also be misused or misinterpreted. The idea that our universe might be modelled as a computational entity is analysed, and we discuss the distinction between physical laws and initial conditions using algorithmic information theory. Smolin introduced the theory of “Cosmological Natural Selection” with a biological analogy in mind. We examine an extension of this analogy involving intelligent life. We discuss if and how this extension could be legitimated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, F. C., & Laughlin, G. (1997). A dying universe: The long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects. Reviews of Modern Physics, 69(2), 337–372. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9701131.
Aguirre, A. (2001). Cold big-bang cosmology as a counterexample to Several anthropic arguments. Physical Review D, 64(8), 83508. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0106143.
Baláz, B. A. (2005). The cosmological replication cycle, the extraterrestrial paradigm and the final anthropic principle. Diotima, no. 33: 44–53. http://astro.elte.hu/~bab/seti/IACP12z.htm.
Barrow J. D. (2001) Cosmology, life, and the anthropic principle. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 950(1): 139
Barrow J. D., Morris S. C., Freeland S., Harper C. (2008) Fitness of the cosmos for life: Biochemistry and fine-tuning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
Barrow J. D., Tipler F. J. (1986) The anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford University Press, New York
Bostrom N. (2002) Anthropic bias: Observation selection effects in science and philosophy. Routledge, New York
Bostrom, N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243–255. http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.pdf.
Carr, B. (eds) (2007a) Universe or multiverse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Carr B. (2007b) The Anthropic Principle Revisited. In: Carr B. (eds) Universe or multiverse?. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 77–89
Carroll S. B. (2005) Endless forms most beautiful: The new science of Evo Devo and the making of the animal kingdom. WW Norton & Company, New York
Chaisson E. J. (2001) Cosmic evolution: The rise of complexity in nature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Chaisson E. J. (2006) Epic of evolution: Seven ages of the cosmos. Columbia University Press, New York
Chaitin G. J. (1974) Information-theoretic limitations of formal systems. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 21(3): 403–424
Chaitin G. J. (1987) Algorithmic information theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chaitin G.J. (2006) Meta math!. Atlantic Books, London
Cirkovic, M. (2003). Resource letter: PEs-1: Physical eschatology. American Journal of Physics 71, 122. http://www.aob.bg.ac.yu/~mcirkovic/Cirkovic03_RESOURCE_LETTER.pdf.
Crane, L. (2010). Possible implications of the quantum theory of gravity: An introduction to the meduso-anthropic principle. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9182-y. http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5508.
Davies P. C. W. (1982) The accidental universe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Davies P. C. W. (1989) The cosmic blueprint. Touchstone Books, New York
Davies P. C. W. (1998) Our place in the universe. In: Leslie J. (eds) Modern cosmology & philosophy. Prometheus Books, Amherst, pp 311–318
Davies P. C. W. (2008) The goldilocks engima: Why is the universe just right for life?. Mariner Books, Boston
De Duve C. (1995) Vital dust: Life as a cosmic imperative. Basic Books, New York
Duff, M. J. (2002). Comment on time-variation of fundamental constants. Arxiv preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208093.
Duff, M. J., Okun, L. B., & Veneziano, G. (2002). Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2002(3), 19. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0110060.
Ellis G. F. R. (1993) Before the beginning: Cosmology explained. Marion Boyars Publishers, London
Ellis G. F. R. (2007) Multiverses: Description, uniqueness and testing. In: Carr B. (eds) Universe or Multiverse?. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 387–410
Ellis, G. F. R. (2007). Issues in the philosophy of cosmology. In J. Butterfield & J. Earman (Eds.) Handbook in philosophy of physics (pp. 1183–1285). Elsevier. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602280.
Fry I. (1995) Are the different hypotheses on the emergence of life as different as they seem?. Biology and Philosophy 10(4): 389–417
Gardner J. N. (2000) The selfish biocosm: Complexity as cosmology. Complexity 5(3): 34–45
Gardner J. N. (2003) Biocosm. The new scientific theory of evolution: Intelligent life is the architect of the universe. Inner Ocean Publishing, Makawao
Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. Metaphor and Thought, 447. http://www.psych.northwestern.edu/psych/people/faculty/gentner/newpdfpapers/GentnerJeziorski93.pdf.
Gribbin J., Rees M. J. (1991) Cosmic coincidences, dark matter, mankind, and anthropic cosmology. Black Swan, London
Harrison, E.R. (1995). The natural selection of universes containing intelligent life. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 36(3), 193–203. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996QJRAS..37..369B.
Hesse M. (1966) Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, IN
Hofstadter D. R. (1995) Fluid concepts & creative analogies. Basic Books, New York
Hogan, C. J. (2000). Why the universe is just so. Reviews of Modern Physics, 72(4), 1149–1161. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9909295.
Holyoak K. J., Thagard P. (1995) Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Jenkins, A., & Perez, G. (2010, January). Looking for Life in the Multiverse: Universes with different physical laws might still be habitable. Scientific American.
Laszlo E. (1972) Introduction to systems philosophy: Toward a new paradigm of contemporary thought. Gordon & Breach Science Pub, New York
Leary D. E. (1990) Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Leibniz, G. W. (1714). Principles of nature and of grace founded on reason (Trans. M. Morris, & E. P. Dutton, 1934).
Leslie, J. (1989). Universes. Routledge.
Leslie, J. (eds) (1998) Modern cosmology & philosophy. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY
Lévy-Leblond, J. M. (1979). The importance of being (a) constant. In G. Torraldi (Ed.), Problems in the foundations of physics, Enrico Fermi School LXXII (p. 237), North Holland.
Lloyd S. (2005) Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. Vintage Books, New York
Martin, M. (2006). The mocking memes: A basis for automated intelligence. AuthorHouse. Published under pseudonym Evan Louis Sheehan, http://evanlouissheehan.home.comcast.net/~evanlouissheehan/TheMockingMemes.pdf.
Minsky M. (1986) The society of mind. Simon & Schuster Inc., New York, NY
Neumann, J. (1951). The general and logical theory of automata. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon symposium. http://crl.ucsd.edu/~elman/Courses/cog202/Papers/vonneumann.pdf.
Nottale, L. (2003). Scale-Relativistic Cosmology. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 16, no. 4: 539-564. http://luth2.obspm.fr/~luthier/nottale/arScRCosmo.pdf.
Nottale, L. (2010). Scale relativity and fractal space-time: Theory and applications. Foundations of Science, 15(2), 101–152. doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9170-2. http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5508.
Paley, W. (1802). Natural theology. Oxford University Press, 2006, USA. http://www.theapologiaproject.org/NATURAL%20THEOLOGY.pdf.
Rees M. (2000) Just six numbers: The deep forces that shape the universe. Basic Books, New York
Rescher N. (2000) The price of an ultimate theory. Philosophia Naturalis 37(1): 1–20
Rozental I. L. (1980) Physical laws and the numerical values of fundamental constants. Soviet Physics Uspekhi 23(6): 296–305
Smart, J. (2008). Evo devo universe? A framework for speculations on cosmic culture. In S. J. Dick & M. L. Lupisella (Eds.), Cosmos and culture: Cultural evolution in a cosmic context (pp. 201–295). http://accelerating.org/downloads/SmartEvoDevoUniv2008.pdf.
Smolin L. (1992) Did the universe evolve?. Classical and Quantum Gravity 9(1): 173–191
Smolin L. (1997) The life of the cosmos. Oxford University Press, USA
Smolin, L. (2007). Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle. In B. Carr (Ed.), Universe of multiverse? (pp. 323–366). Cambridge University Press. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0407213.
Stenger V. J. (1995) The unconscious quantum metaphysics in modern physics and cosmology. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY
Stenger V. J. (2000) Natural Explanations for the Anthropic Coincidences. Philo 3(2): 50–67
Stewart, J. (2010). The meaning of life in a developing universe. Foundations of Science, doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9184-9. http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5508.
Susskind L. (2006) The cosmic landscape: String theory and the illusion of intelligent design. Back Bay Books, New York
Tegmark M., Aguirre A., Rees M. J., Wilczek F. (2006) Dimensionless constants, cosmology, and other dark matters. Physical Review D 73(2): 23505
Vaas, R. (1998). Is there a Darwinian evolution of the cosmos?—some comments on Lee Smolin’s theory of the origin of universes by means of natural selection. MicroCosmos–MacroCosmos conference in Aachen, Germany, September 2–5 1998; finished in late 1998 and published in the conference proceedings. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0205119.
Vidal, C. (2007). An enduring philosophical agenda. Worldview Construction as a Philosophical Method. Submitted for publication. http://cogprints.org/6048/.
Vidal, C. (2008). The future of scientific simulations: From artificial life to artificial cosmogenesis. In C. Tandy (Ed.), Death and anti-death (Vol. 6): Thirty years after Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) (Vol. 6, pp. 285–318). Ria University Press. http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.1087.
Vidal, C. (2009). Metaphilosophical criteria for worldview comparison. Working Paper. http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~clvidal/writings/Vidal2009-Metaphilosophical-Criteria.pdf.
Wikipedia Contributors. (2008). Kolmogorov complexity. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, August 11. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kolmogorov_complexity&oldid=231230603.
Wilczek, F. (1999). Quantum field theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 71(2), 85–95. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9803075.
Wolfram S. (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media Inc. Champaign, IL
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vidal, C. Computational and Biological Analogies for Understanding Fine-Tuned Parameters in Physics. Found Sci 15, 375–393 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9183-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9183-x