Abstract
Chemistry, especially its historical practice, has in the philosophy of science in recent decades attracted more and more attention, influencing the turn from the vision of science as a timeless logic-centred system of statements towards the history- and practice-centred approach. The problem of pluralism in science has become a popular topic in that context. Hasok Chang’s “active normative epistemic pluralism” manifested in his book (2012) Is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism, pursuing an integrated study of history and philosophy of science, has provoked quite a widespread debate. It provides a good opportunity to discuss the topical philosophical issue of the nature of disagreements. The differences among disagreements in different domains have been pointed out in the disagreement literature. It has been noticed that in mathematics and science consensus is established more clearly than in philosophy where it remains largely unachievable (Kornblith in Disagreement, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 29–52, 2010). However, this conclusion is derived in the context of traditional logic-centred view of science. The aim of this paper is to consider the different nature of disagreements in science and in philosophy in the context of the history- and practice-centred approach. The analysis is focused on the critique of the received view of the Chemical Revolution which played quite a central role in Chang’s becoming a pluralist about science. Unlike Chang, however, a modified Kuhnian paradigm-conception of science and scientific revolutions is defended.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bensaude-Vincent, B., Simon, J.: Chemistry—the impure science. Imperial College Press, London (2008)
Bird, A.: Kuhn’s wrong turning. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 33, 443–463 (2002)
Chalmers, A.: Review of Hasok Chang: is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism. Sci. Educ. 22, 913–920 (2013)
Chang, H.: The persistence of epistemic objects through scientific change. Erkenntnis 75, 413–429 (2011)
Chang, H.: Is water H2O? evidence, realism and pluralism. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)
Chang, H.: Incommensurability: revisiting the Chemical Revolution. In: Kindi, V., Arabatzis, T. (eds.) Kuhn’s the structure of scientific revolutions revisited, pp. 153–176 (2012b)
Chang, H.: The Chemical Revolution revisited. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 49, 91–98 (2015)
Chang, H., Nordman, A., Bensaude-Vincent, B., Simon, J.: Ask not what philosophy can do for chemistry, but what chemistry can do for philosophy. Metascience 19, 373–383 (2010)
Davies, A.: Kuhn on incommensurability and theory choice. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 44, 571–579 (2013)
Feyerabend, P.K.: Consolations for the specialist. In: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the growth of knowledge, pp. 197–230. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)
Gordin, M.D.: The Tory interpretetion of history (review of H. Chang, Is water H2O?). Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 44, 413–423 (2014)
Heidegger, M.: The age of the world picture. In: The question concerning technology and other essays (trans. William Lovitt). Harper and Row, New York (1977)
Hoyningen-Huene, P.: Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Found. Chem. 10, 101–115 (2008)
Klein, U.: A revolution that never happened. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 49, 80–90 (2015)
Kornblith, H.: Belief in the face of controversy. In: Feldman, R., Warfield, T.A. (eds.) Disagreement, pp. 29–52. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Kuhn, T.S.: The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1970a)
Kuhn, T.S.: Reflections on my critics. In: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the growth of knowledge, pp. 231–278. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970b)
Kuhn, T.S.: The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)
Kusch, M.: Scientific pluralism and the Chemical Revolution. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 49, 69–79 (2015)
Maxwell, N.: From knowledge to wisdom: a revolution for science and the humanities, 2nd edn. Pentire Press, London (2007)
Needham, P.: Questioning the justification of past science. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 27(1), 85–93 (2013)
Popper, K.R.: Normal science and its dangers. In: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the growth of knowledge, pp. 51–58. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)
Popper, K.R.: The logic of scientific discovery, 5th (revised) edn. Hutchimson & Co., London (1968)
Rouse, J.: Science as practice: two readings of Thomas Kuhn, chapter 2. In: Knowledge and power: toward a political philosophy of science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London (1987)
Rouse, J.: How scientific practices matter: reclaiming philosophical naturalism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2002)
Rouse, J.: Kuhn’s philosophy of scientific practice, In: Nickles, T. (ed.) Thomas Kuhn, pp. 101–121. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Schindler, S.: The Kuhnian mode of HPS. Synthese 190, 4137–4154 (2013)
Stepin, V.: Theoretical knowledge. Springer, Dordrect (2005)
van Brakel, J.: Philosophy of chemistry: between the manifest and the scientific image. Leuven University Press, Leuven (2000)
Vihalemm, R.: The history of formation of a science: on the development of chemistry. Valgus, Tallinn (1981). (in Estonian)
Vihalemm, R.: The Kuhn-loss thesis and the case of phlogiston theory. Sci. Stud. (Helsinki) 13(1), 68–78 (2000)
Vihalemm, R.: The problem of the unity of science and chemistry. In: Sobczynska, D., Zeidler, P., Zielonacka-Lis, E. (eds.) Chemistry in the philosophical melting pot, pp. 39–58. Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt am Main (2004)
Vihalemm, R.: Philosophy of chemistry and the image of science. Found. Sci. 12(3), 223–234 (2007)
Vihalemm, R.: Towards a practical realist philosophy of science. Balt. J. Eur. Stud. 1(9), 46–60 (2011)
Vihalemm, R.: Practical realism: against standard scientific realism and anti-realism. Stud. Philos. Estonica 5(2), 7–22 (2012)
Vihalemm, R.: What is a scientific concept: some considerations concerning chemistry in practical realist philosophy of science. In: Llored, J.-P. (ed.) The philosophy of chemistry: practices methodologies and concepts, pp. 364–384. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2013)
Vihalemm, R.: Philosophy of chemistry against standard scientific realism and anti-realism. Philos. Sci. 19(1) (2015a) (in press)
Vihalemm, R.: Science, φ-science, and the dual character of chemistry. In: Scerri, E., Fischer, G. (eds.) Chapters in the Philosophy of Chemistry. Oxford University Press, New York (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Rein Vihalemm: Deceased.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vihalemm, R. Chemistry and the problem of pluralism in science: an analysis concerning philosophical and scientific disagreements. Found Chem 18, 91–102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-015-9241-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-015-9241-0