Skip to main content
Log in

Gadamerian dialogue in the patient-professional interaction

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his seminal work, Truth and Method, theGerman philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer distinguishesbetween three types of what he calls the experience ofthe `Thou'. In this paper, Gadamer's analysis of thisexperience is explained in terms of his philosophicalhermeneutics and brought to bear upon thepatient-professional relationship. It is argued thatwhile Gadamer's analysis implies fruitful insights fora dialogical account of the patient-professionalinteraction, it harbours elements which are conduciveto paternalistic practice of medicine. The strongattribution of value to tradition and the respect forauthority emphasized in his theory result in a lack ofsensitivity for individual self-determination which isneeded for a successful account of thepatient-professional relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Árnason, V.: 1994, ‘Towards authentic conversations. Authenticity in the patient-professional relationship’, Theoretical Medicine 15(3), 227-242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M.: 1965, The Knowledge of Man. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, R.S.: 1998, ‘Medical technology and medical futility’, Ends and Means 2(2), 15-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G.: 1975, Truth and Method. New York: The Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G.: 1977, Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G.: 1993, Ñber die Verborgenheit der Gesundheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.: 1984, The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.: 1985, ‘Can principles survive in situations of critical care?’, In: J.C. Moskop and L. Kopelman (eds.), Ethics and Critical Care Medicine. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publ. Comp., pp. 41-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.: 1981, ‘Three models of the nurse-patient relationship’, In: T.A. Mappes and J.S. Zembathy (eds.), Biomedical Ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 120-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. and H. Hollander: 1956, ‘A contribution to the philosophy of medicine: The basic models of the doctor-patient relationship’, Archives of Internal Medicine 97, 585-592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.M: 1972, ‘Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age’, Hasting Center Report 2(6), 5-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnke, G.: 1987, Gadamer. Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason. New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Árnason, V. Gadamerian dialogue in the patient-professional interaction. Med Health Care Philos 3, 17–23 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009908132170

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009908132170

Navigation