Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede's typology

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses a significant gap in the conceptualization of business ethics within different cultural influences. Though theoretical models of business ethics have recognized the importance of culture in ethical decision-making, few have examinedhow this influences ethical decision-making. Therefore, this paper develops propositions concerning the influence of various cultural dimensions on ethical decision-making using Hofstede's typology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P. F.: 1983, ‘Marketing Scientific Progress and Scientific Method’,Journal of Marketing, 18–31.

  • Bartels, R.: 1967, ‘A Model for Ethics in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing, 20–26.

  • Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie: 1979,Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, J. S.: 1976, ‘Managerial Ethics in Business and Government’,Business Horizons 19, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1975, ‘Managerial Ethics: A Post-Watergate View,Business Horizons 18, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B. and S. D. Hunt: 1985, ‘Ethics and Marketing Management: An Empirical Examination’,Journal of Business Research 13, 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dant, R. and J. H. Barnes: 1989, ‘Methodological Concerns in Cross-Cultural Research: Implications for Economic Development’, in E. Kumcu and A. F. Firat (eds.),Marketing and Development: Toward Broader Dimensions, Research in Marketing Supplement 4 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CN), pp. 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., E. N. Berkowitz and W. Rudelius: 1980, ‘Ethical Problems of Field Sales Personnel’,MSU Business Topics, 11–16.

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and S. J. Skinner: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations’,Journal of Marketing Research 25, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and K. M. Weaver: 1978, ‘Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Managers’,Journal of Marketing, 69–73.

  • Ferrell, O. C., M. Zey-Ferrell and D. Krugman: 1983, ‘A Comparison of Predictors of Ethical and Unethical Behavior Among Corporate and Agency Advertising Managers’,Journal of Macromarketing, 19–27.

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’,Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims: 1979, ‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: An Laboratory Experiment’,Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3), 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1979, ‘Value Systems in Forty Countries: Interpretation, Validation, and Consequences for Theory’, in L. H. Eckensberger, W. J. Lonner and Y. H. Poortinga (eds.),Cross-Cultural Contributions to Psychology (Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, Netherlands), pp. 398–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1980,Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1983, ‘Dimensions of National Culture in Fifty Countries and Three Regions’, in J. B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec and R. C. Annios (eds.),Expiscations in Cross-Cultural Psychology (Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, Netherlands), pp. 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1984, ‘The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept’,Academy of Management Review 9(3), 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. and L. Chonko: 1984, ‘Marketing and Machiavellianism’,Journal of Marketing 48, 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., L. Chonko and J. B. Wilcox: 1984, ‘Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers’,Journal of Marketing Research 21, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of Macromarketing 8, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1992, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision’, in J. Quelch and C. Smith (eds.),Ethics in Marketing (Richard D. Irwin, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., V. R. Wood and L. B. Chonko: 1989, ‘Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 53, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J.: 1978, ‘Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review’,Journal of Marketing 42, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaikati, J. and W. A. Label: 1980, ‘American Bribery Legislation: An Obstacle to International Marketing’,Journal of Marketing, 38–43.

  • Krugman, D. M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1981, ‘The Organizational Ethics of Advertising: Corporate and Agency Views’,Journal of Advertising, 21–30.

  • Laczniak, G. R.: 1983, ‘Framework for Analyzing Marketing Ethics’,Journal of Macromarketing, 7–18.

  • Lusch, R. F., G. R. Laczniak and P. E. Murphy: 1980, ‘The ‘Ethics of Social Ideas’ Versus the ‘Ethics of Marketing Social Ideas’’,Journal of Consumer Affairs, 156–163.

  • Mason, J. B., W. O. Bearden and L. D. Richardson: 1990, ‘Perceived Conduct and Professional Ethics Among Marketing Faculty’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18(3), 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M. A. and L. J. Marks: 1990, ‘An Expirical Investigation of a General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18(2), 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. and G. R. Laczniak: 1981, ‘Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchers’,Review of Marketing, 251–266.

  • Ouchi, W. G.: 1981,Theory Z (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., D. P. Robin and L. Dawson: 1991, ‘An Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Marketing Practices and Marketing Groups’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19(2), 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. P. and R. E. Reidenbach: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application’,Journal of Marketing 51, 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathe, V.: 1985,Culture and Related Corporate Realities. (Richard D, Irwin, Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N.: 1967, ‘A Review of Buyer Behavior’,Management Science 13, 719–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1991, ‘Research Note: Selected Factors Influencing Marketers' Deontological Norms’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 9(1), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1990, ‘Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives’,Journal of Macromarketing 10, 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdivant, F. D. and A. B. Cocanougher: 1973, ‘What are Ethical Marketing Practices?’,Harvard Business Review 10–12, 176.

  • Sutherland, E. and D. R. Cressey: 1970,Principles of Criminology, 8th ed. (Lippincott, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. and S. D. Hunt: 1990, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Partial Test of the Model’,Research in Marketing 10, 237–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K. M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1977, ‘The Impact of Corporate Policy on Reported Ethical Beliefs and Behavior of Marketing Practitioners’, in B. A. Greenberg and D. N. Bellenger (eds.),Contemporary Marketing Thought (American Marketing Association Proceedings, Chicago).

  • Wind, Y. and R. J. Thomas: 1980, ‘Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Organizational Buying Behavior’,European Journal of Marketing 4, 239–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1982, ‘Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations’,Human Relations 35(7), 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M., K. M. Weaver and O. C. Ferrell: 1979, ‘Predicting Unethical Behavior Among Marketing Practitioners’,Human Relations, 557–569.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Marketing, School of Business Administration, The University of Mississippi, 38677, University, MS, USA

    Scott J. Vitell, Saviour L. Nwachukwu & James H. Barnes

Authors
  1. Scott J. Vitell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saviour L. Nwachukwu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James H. Barnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Scott J. Vitell is Associate Professor of Marketing and holder of the Michael S. Starnes Lecturship in Marketing and Business Ethics at the University of Mississippi. His work has previously appeared in theJournal of Macromarketing, theJournal of Business Ethics, Research in Marketing, and theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science as well as various other journals and proceedings.

Saviour Nwachukwu is a Ph.D. candidate in Marketing. His research interests include international marketing, marketing and economic development, and marketing ethics.

James H. Barnes is Associate Professor of Marketing and Pharmacy Administration and holder of the Morris Lewis, Jr. Lectureship in Marketing at the University of Mississippi. His research has previously appeared in theJournal of Marketing Research as well as other journals and proceedings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vitell, S.J., Nwachukwu, S.L. & Barnes, J.H. The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede's typology. J Bus Ethics 12, 753–760 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881307

Keywords

Search

Navigation