Skip to main content
Log in

On the Expressive Power of Monotone Natural Language Quantifiers over Finite Models

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study definability in terms of monotone generalized quantifiers satisfying Isomorphism Closure, Conservativity and Extension. Among the quantifiers with the latter three properties – here called CE quantifiers – one finds the interpretations of determiner phrases in natural languages. The property of monotonicity is also linguistically ubiquitous, though some determiners like an even number of are highly non-monotone. They are nevertheless definable in terms of monotone CE quantifiers: we give a necessary and sufficient condition for such definability. We further identify a stronger form of monotonicity, called smoothness, which also has linguistic relevance, and we extend our considerations to smooth quantifiers. The results lead us to propose two tentative universals concerning monotonicity and natural language quantification. The notions involved as well as our proofs are presented using a graphical representation of quantifiers in the so-called number triangle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Barwise, J. and Cooper, R.: Generalized quantifiers and natural language, Linguistics & Philosophy 4 (1981), 159-219.

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Benthem, J.: Questions about quantifiers, J. Symbolic Logic 49 (1984), 443-466.

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Benthem, J.: Essays in Logical Semantics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graham, R., Rotschild, B. and Spencer, J.: Ramsey Theory, Wiley, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hella, L., Luosto, K. and Väänänen, J.: The hierarchy theorem for generalized quantifiers, J. Symbolic Logic 61 (1996), 802-819.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keenan, E. and Stavi, J.: A semantic characterization of natural language determiners, Linguistics & Philosophy 9 (1986), 253-326.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keenan, E. and Westerståhl, D.: Generalized quantifiers in linguistics and logic, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997, 837-893.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kolaitis, Ph. and Väänänen, J.: Generalized quantifiers and pebble games on finite structures, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 74 (1995), 23-75.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luosto, K.: Ramsey theory is needed for solving definability problems of generalized quantifiers, in Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 1754, Springer, Berlin, 1999, pp. 121-134.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Väänänen, J.: Unary quantifiers on finite models, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (1997), 275-304.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Westerståhl, D.: Quantifiers in formal and natural languages, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. IV, D.Reidel, Dordrecht, 1989, pp. 1-131.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Westerståhl, D.: Relativization of quantifiers in finite models, in J. van der Does and J. van Eijck (eds.), Generalized Quantifier Theory and Applications, ILLC, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 187-205. Also in Quantifiers: Logic, Models and Computation (same editors), CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996, pp. 375-383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Väänänen, J., Westerståhl, D. On the Expressive Power of Monotone Natural Language Quantifiers over Finite Models. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31, 327–358 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019934611163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019934611163

Navigation