Abstract
A systemic phenomenological model that assumes the movability of the Cartesian cut is proposed and elucidated by means of a single exploratory case study. The model assumes that a continuum from purely psychosomatic disorders to RSPK cases exists. The degree of externalization (locus of control) of the affected person serves as an ordering parameter for the location of the Cartesian cut. It turns out that the dynamics of the disorder develops in four phases, like in the RSPK-model of the MPI. However, in contrast to the decline phase of the RSPK cases (because of the NT-axiom), CER cases lead to petrification of the complaints.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term “poltergeist phenomena” is a folkloristic word which is uses by persons concerned to describe their experiences. The term RSPK (Recurrent Spontaneous Psycho-Kinesis) is a concept which was developed in parapsychology to designate poltergeist phenomena.
The opinion repeatedly put forward (see Hergovich 2001; Lambeck 1997; Leick 2006), that one must not apply quantum theory to macroscopic systems, is itself questionable and in any case not applicable here (see Lucadou 1974, 1997; Römer and Leick 2006) because GQT and MPI are not reductionistic models. Thus, one should better speak of "generalized entanglement" and/or "entanglement-like effects" instead of “entanglement” as we do here for brevity.
The term “control” does not necessarily mean causal interaction here, therefore it is put in quotation marks.
Definition by the World Health Organization (WHO): EHS is characterized by a variety of non-specific symptoms that differ from individual to individual. The symptoms are certainly real and can vary widely in their severity. Whatever its cause, EHS can be a disabling problem for the affected individual. EHS has no clear diagnostic criteria and there is no scientific basis to link EHS symptoms to EMF exposure. Further, EHS is not a medical diagnosis, nor is it clear that it represents a single medical problem. (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs296/en/index.html).
Summary of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI): IEI-also called environmental illness and multiple chemical sensitivities-has been postulated to be a disease unique to modern industrial society in which certain persons are said to acquire exquisite sensitivity to numerous chemically unrelated environmental substances. The patient experiences wide-ranging symptoms, but evidence of pathology or physiologic dysfunction in such patients has been lacking in studies to date. Because of the subjective nature of the illness, an objective case definition is not possible. Allergic, immunotoxic, neurotoxic, cytotoxic, psychologic, sociologic, and iatrogenic theories have been postulated for both etiology and production of symptoms, but there is an absence of scientific evidence to establish any of these mechanisms as definitive. Most studies to date, however, have found an excess of current and past psychopathology in patients with this diagnosis. The relationship of these findings to the patient's symptoms is also not apparent. Rigorously controlled studies to verify the patient's reported subjective sensitivity to specific environmental chemicals have yet to be done. Moreover, there is no evidence that these patients have any immunologic or neurologic abnormalities. In addition, no form of therapy has yet been shown to alter the patient's illness in a favorable way. A causal connection between environmental chemicals, foods, and/or drugs and the patient's symptoms continues to be speculative and cannot be based on the results of currently published scientific studies. (http://www.aaaai.org/members/academy_statements/position_statements/ps35.asp).
ICD-10-WHO 1.3: G93.3.
In may be argued that since the effects of pseudo-machines are unstable and non-replicable under changed psychological conditions contradicts the similarity to CER because CER symptoms are described to be rather persistent and chronical. However, this contradiction disappears if one takes into account the distinction between the exo- and endo-view in relation to petrification.
Since this is a single-case exploratory study no further analysis is given. It is an open question whether further details could reveal results, which could be generalized. The case should not be overestimated and be regarded as an illustration, which might provoke new ideas within this very complex field of research.
References
Atmanspacher H, Römer H, Walach H (2002) Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Found Phys 32:379–406
Bauer E, Lucadou W (1988) Parapsychologie. In: Asanger R, Wenninger G (Hrsg.) Handwörterbuch psychologie. Verlags Union, München-Weinheim, S. 517–524
Bauer E, Lucadou W (1991) A strawman called ‘psi’ - or: what is Professor Bunge afraid of? New Ideas Psychol 9(2):152–162
Bauer E, Kornwachs K, Lucadou W (1981) Vom Widerstand gegen das Paranormale. In: Dürr HP (Hrsg.) Der Wissenschaftler und das Irrationale, Bd 2. Syndikat, Frankfurt a.M, S. 353–370
Bender H (1974) Modern poltergeist research—A plea for an unprejudiced approach. In: Beloff J (ed) New directions in parapsychology. Elek Science, London, pp 122–143
Bösch H, Steinkamp F, Boller E (2006) Examining psychokinesis: the interaction of human intention with random number generators: a meta analysis. Psychol Bull 132(4):497–523
Hergovich A (2001) Der Glaube an Psi. Die Psychologie paranormaler Überzeugungen. Hans Huber Verlag, Bern
Huesmann M, Schriever F (1989) Steckbrief des Spuks. Darstellung und Diskussion einer Sammlung von 54 RSPK-Berichten des Freiburger Instituts für Grenzgebiete der Psychologie und Psychohygiene aus den Jahren 1947–1986. Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie 31:52–107
Hyman R, Wisemann R, Watt C, Roe C (2009) Parapsychology 2009: dead or alive? Four eminent researchers give their views on the current state of parapsychology and its future prospects. The Skeptic 22(2):17–27
Jahn R (1981) The persistent paradox of psychic phenomena: an engineering perspective. Proc IEEE 70(2):136–170
Jahn R, Dunne B, Bradish C, Dobyns Y, Lettieri A, Nelson R, Mischo J, Boller E, Bösch H, Vaitl D, Houtkooper J, Walter B (2000) Mind/machine interaction consortium: PortREG replication experiments. J Sci Explor 14(4):499–555
Josephson BD (1979) Foreword. In: Puharich A (ed) The Iceland papers. Select papers on experimental and theoretical research on the physics of consciousness. Essentia Research Associates, Amherst, p 5
Lambeck M (1997) Können Paraphänomene durch die Quantentheorie erklärt werden? Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie 39:103–116 und Antwort auf die Replik von Dr. Dr. von Lucadou, 117–122
Leick P (2006) Die schwache Quantentheorie und die Homöopathie. Skeptiker 19(3/06):92–102
Lucadou W (1974) Zum parapsychologischen experiment—eine methodologische Skizze. Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie 16:57–62
Lucadou W (1983) Der flüchtige Spuk. In: Bauer E, Lucadou W (eds) Spektrum der Parapsychologie. Aurum Verlag, Freiburg i.Br., pp 150–166
Lucadou W (1984) What is wrong with the definition of psi? Eur J Parapsychol 5:261–283; deutsche Übersetzung 1985: was stimmt nicht mit der Psi-Definition. Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie 27:3–23
Lucadou W (1986) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Beeinflußbarkeit von stochastischen quantenphysikalischen Systemen durch den Beobachter. H.-A. Herchen Verlag, Frankfurt
Lucadou W (1987) The model of pragmatic information (MPI). In: Morris RL (ed) The parapsychological association 30th annual convention, proceedings of presented papers. Parapsychological Association, pp 236–254
Lucadou W (1989a) Vom Abgrund der Systeme. Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie 31:108–121
Lucadou W (1989b) Psyche und Chaos. Neue Ergebnisse der Psychokinese-Forschung. Aurum, Freiburg
Lucadou W (1991a) Makroskopische Nichtlokalität. In: Kratky KW (Hrsg.) Systemische Perspektiven: interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu Theorie und Praxis. Carl Auer, Heidelberg, S 45–63
Lucadou W (1991b) Locating Psi-bursts—correlations between psychological characteristics of observers and observed quantum physical fluctuations. In: Delanoy DL (ed) The parapsychological association 34th annunal convention, proceedings of presented papers. Parapsychological Accociation, Heidelberg, pp 265–281
Lucadou W (1995a) The model of pragmatic information (MPI). Eur J Parapsychol 11:58–75
Lucadou W (1995b) Psyche und Chaos—Theorien der Parapsychologie. Inselverlag, Frankfurt a.M.
Lucadou W (1997) Muß die Quantentheorie durch Paraphänomene ergänzt werden?—Bemerkungen zu Professor Lambecks Thesen. Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie 39:117–123
Lucadou W (2000) Spuk. In: Syliva M Schomburg-Scherff und Beatrix Heintze (Hrsg.) Die offenen Grenzen der Ethnologie. Lembeck, Frankfurt a.M., S 219–230
Lucadou W (2001) Hans in luck—the currency of evidence in parapsychology. J Parapsychol 65:3–16
Lucadou W (2002a) Verhexung—Erfahrungen einer parapsychologischen Beratungsstelle. In: Walter Bruchhausen (Hg.) Hexerei und Krankheit. Lit Verlag Münster 2003, pp 195–218
Lucadou W (2002b) Die Magie der Pseudomaschine. In: Wilfreid Belschner, Joachim Galuska, Harald Walach, Edith Zundel (Hrg.) Transpersonale Forschung im Kontext. Oldenburg: transpersonale Studien 5, Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg 2002; also in: (2009) Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie, 44/45/46 S. 3–19
Lucadou W (2002c) Homeopathy and the action of meaning—the model of pragmatic information (MPI) and homeopathy. In: Walach H, Schneider R, Chez RA (eds) Proceedings: future directions and current issues of research in homeopathy. Freiburg
Lucadou W (2003) Beratung bei paranormalen Erlebnissen. In: Galuska J (Hrg.) Den horizont erweitern. Ulrich Leutner Verlag, Berlin, S. 204–230
Lucadou W (2006) Self-organization of temporal structures—a possible solution for the intervention problem. In: Sheehan DP (ed) Frontiers of time. Retrocausation—experiment and theory. AIP conference proceeedings, vol 863. AIP, Melville, pp 293–315
Lucadou W, Zahradnik F (2004) Predictions of the MPI about RSPK. In: Schmidt S (ed) Proceedings of the 47th annual convention of the parapsychological association. Parapsychological Association, Vienna, pp 99–112 [abstracted in Journal of Parapsychology 69:31–32]
Lucadou W, Zahradnik F (2005) Die verschwiegene Erfahrung—ungewöhnliche Erlebnisse in der transpersonalen Psychologie. Zeitschrift für transpersonale Psychologie 2:78–89
Lucadou W, Römer H, Walach H (2007) Synchronistic phenomena as entanglement correlations in generalized quantum theory. J Consciousness Stud 14(4):50–74
Mahner M (2010) Der Tod der Parapsychologie (1850–2009). Skeptiker 2/2010:79–80
Mischo J (1970) Zur Persönlichkeitsstruktur psychokinetischer Medien. Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie 12:19–25
Moser F (1977) Spuk–Ein Rätsel der Menschheit. Walter-Verlag, Olten u. Freiburg
Primas H (1992) Time-asymmetric phenomena in biology complementary exophysical descriptions arising from deterministic quantum endophysics. Open Syst Inf Dyn 1:3–34
Primas H (1995) Mathematical and philosophical questions in the theory of open and macroscopic quantum systems. In: Miller AI (ed) Sixty-two years of uncertainty. New York, Plenum, pp 233–257
Primas H (1996) Synchronizität und Zufall. Zeitschrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie 38:61–91
Radin DI, Nelson RD (1989) Evidence for consciousness-related anomalies in random physical systems. Foundat Phys 19:1499 1514
Reissenweber J, Wojtysiak A, David E (2004) Das Phänomen der Elektrosensibilität/Elektrosensitivität in der hausärztlichen Praxis. Ein Überblick über den gegenwärtigen Forschungsstand. Frequentia, Nov 2004, pp 1–12
Römer H, Leick P (2006) Gemeinsame Erklärung. Skeptiker 19(4/06):176–178
Rotter JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs 80 (1. whole No. 609)
Storm L, Ertel S (2001) Does Psi exist? Comments on Milton and Wiseman’s (1999) meta-analysis of Ganzfeld research. Psychol Bull 127(3):424–433
Summhammer J (2006) Quantum cooperation of two insects. arXiv:quant-ph/0503136v2
Timm U (2007) Reanalyse einer Metaanalyse von RNG-PK-Experimenten. WGFP-Workshop, Offenburg 21.10.2007
Untersuchung des Brummton-Phänomens (2001) Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg, Sachgebiet 33.2 Lärm, des Referates Luftqualität, Lärm, Verkehr. http://www.lfu.baden-wuerttemberg.de
Weizsäcker E (1974) Erstmaligkeit und Bestätigung als Komponenten der pragmatischen information. In: Weizsäcker E (Hrg.) Offene Systeme I. Klett, Stuttgart, pp 83–113
Zahradnik F (2007) Irritation der Wirklichkeit. Eine qualitative und quantitative Analyse der Briefsammlung der Parapsychologischen Beratungsstelle in Freiburg. Lit-Verlag, Münster
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
von Lucadou, W.E.M. Complex Environmental Reactions, as a New Concept to Describe Spontaneous “Paranormal” Experiences. Axiomathes 21, 263–285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9138-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9138-4
Keywords
- General quantum theory (GQT)
- Model of pragmatic Information (MPI)
- NT-axiom
- Cartesian cut
- Heisenberg cut
- Pseudo-machines
- Poltergeist-phenomena
- Recurrent spontaneous psychokinesis (RSPK)
- Hum-phenomenon
- Self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)
- Multiple-chemical-sensitivity (MCS)
- Sick-building-syndrome (SBS)
- Idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI)
- Chronic-fatigue-syndrome (CFS)
- Locus of control
- Non-separability
- Entanglement
- Bottom-up and top-down processes